f0rrest: (kid pix w/ text)
I feel the need to preface this entire entry with the following: I don’t like what I’ve written here, it meanders without making a cogent point, but I’m posting it anyway because, one, sunk-time fallacy, and two, I’m too lazy to “fix” it and have lost interest in doing so, and three, I don’t really care that much, although I do care enough to post this preface to “save face” with all three of my readers. Anyway, on with the 3443-word ramble.

Let’s say you’re a detective. You’re working a case involving a serial sex-trafficker murderer who has eluded capture for five years or something like that. The guy is always just barely slipping away, killing more people. He’s killed at least 15 people so far that you know of, according to the file. You’re tracking down a new lead for this case, a tip you got in your email last night, and this takes you to a house off the beaten path, a log cabin in the woods just outside town. The front door is cracked open; there’s a putrid smell coming from inside. You cover your nose with your collar and push into the house proper, removing your pistol from its holster and aiming it out like they taught you in training. In the kitchen, you notice mounds of meat, maybe animal, maybe human, lying in a mess of blood on the countertop. There is a trail of red leading to a door in the kitchen hallway. You radio for backup, then walk up to the door, noticing that the knob is wet with blood. You gag a little bit, lower your collar, and take a pair of plastic gloves, slipping them on, then twist the knob with your gloved hand. There is no light beyond the door, only a void pulsating with almost supernatural dread. You pull out your flashlight, turn it on, and hold it beside your pistol. The cone of light reveals a long, narrow stairwell, cement walls, and blood, smears and handprints of blood. You follow the blood down the steps into a small room where there is another door, a metal door with a latch that appears to be unlatched. You pull the door open to reveal a massive walk-in freezer room. There is a single bulb hanging from the middle of the room, swinging back and forth, casting a dim light on the bruised, battered bodies of once-living people dangling from meat hooks. There are dozens of them, missing arms, legs, faces, breasts, parts of faces, scrotums, and scalps. Strips of yellow-green flesh drip off some of the corpses, forming little piles below them. You feel bile rise in your throat; you swallow it, tighten your pistol grip, then notice something: a figure, a figure in the middle of the room. It’s a man, thin, balding, wearing a fur-collared jacket stained with blood. It’s him, the killer, the man you’ve been searching for. He’s on his knees, hunched over, making smacking and slurping noises. There’s something on the floor in front of him. It’s a human body. He’s hunched over the body. It’s missing an arm. You notice the man, whose back is turned to you, is holding something up to his mouth, something long and appendage-like. It’s the arm. He is eating flesh and drinking blood, making smacking and slurping noises. He has not noticed you. He is just there, on his knees, in the middle of the freezer room, hunched over, eating flesh off a human arm like some sort of storybook monster. You see the dead body below the feasting man, stiff-faced, young, stuck in its last look of wide-eyed horror. You don’t know what to do. It strikes you as almost ridiculous how blatantly evil this scene is. You know this monster has killed at least 15 people, more if you count the bodies on meat hooks. You know that if he gets out, he will do it again. He will find more victims. There’s no reform for this creature. He has thrown away his Human Race Membership Card. You lift your gun. You have a clear shot. It occurs to you that you could kill the beast right now, maybe even claim it was self-defense, that it was justified. Who’s going to know? Hell, who’s going to care? Wouldn’t you be doing everyone a favor, removing this vile creature from the world? Your finger inches toward the trigger. And then, well, I don’t know, then what?

Do you pull the trigger, thereby ridding the world of this monster, or do you arrest him, put him on trial, and hope that he’s found guilty? Maybe he’ll be thrown in prison for the rest of his life, or maybe he’ll be sentenced to death due to the heinous nature of his crimes.

All this begs the question: Do you, or does the state, have any right to take another human’s life, even if that person has basically thrown away their Human Race Membership Card? This is pretty much the core question behind any justice killing, whether it be capital punishment or vigilantism. Does anyone have the right? What does it even mean to “have the right?" Who bestows these rights? Are these rights God-given, or are they a construct of society, or are they something else entirely? Is it true what all the superheroes say, that if we kill the bad guys, we become like the bad guys? Is it really that simple, that black and white?

Well, spoilers for the rest of the entry, but I don’t actually know the answer to any of these questions. I just thought that, through rambling here, I might come to understand my own position better. But before I get into all that, I have a question for you.

Have you ever read The Crow, or maybe watched the movie?

The Crow is a comic book published in 1988, written and illustrated by James O’Barr. It’s about a young man, Eric Draven, who, after he and his wife are murdered by a group of thugs, comes back to life as an immortal avenger, possessed by the spirit of a mystical crow, to enact revenge. The whole appeal of The Crow is that it’s a violent revenge fantasy with a dark, beautiful aesthetic. The entire comic is drawn in this super moody black-and-white style, with lots of violence, blood, and gore, all presented without even the slightest hint of critical introspection. In fact, there’s such a lack of introspection that one can’t help but think that The Crow reveals something about the author, James O’Barr himself, who had to have been working through some seriously dark shit as he was writing and illustrating this book. It’s easy to assume that The Crow is some sort of wish-fulfillment fantasy on behalf of James O’Barr, and if true, his wishes are both violent as hell and superficial as hell, considering that The Crow himself is depicted as a gorgeous American bishonen, even as he’s brutally killing his victims. He’s got a chiseled jaw, dark shoulder-length hair, an Adonis-like physique drawn in near-perfect anatomical detail, and a penchant for black leather and goth makeup. James O’Barr even made it a point to add a number of full-page illustrations showing The Crow in hyper-sexualized poses reminiscent of Michelangelo’s David, portraying him as a sort of pinup girl of death, if that tells you anything about the author’s mental state. It’s also obvious that O’Barr was a mega goth in the 80s, as The Crow has to be one of the most goth-coded comic books ever created, both in its visuals and in the fact that it’s full of song lyrics from bands like Joy Division and The Cure, all plainly cited, which is one of the things that originally drew me to the comic book.

Back in the mid-2000s, when I was a teenager, The Crow was like a perfect match for me. It combined all my adolescent rage, all my musical tastes, all my woe-is-me bullshit, and my preference for violent, disturbing media into one irresistible package. I remember the first time I saw the comic. It was during summer break, and I was at the corporate bookstore. The Crow was pulled out of the row of graphic novels as if someone had just been looking at it but forgotten to slide it back into place on the shelf. I was immediately captivated, thumbing through its pages, awed by the unique art style, the tasteful violence, and the Joy Division quotes. I was so captivated that, before even purchasing it, I had decided it was my favorite comic book ever. That was pretty much how I decided what I liked back then, through style-over-substance snap judgments.

As a teenager, style over substance isn’t such a big deal; it’s actually kind of expected teenage behavior. But as an adult, this shortcoming is harder to ignore. It’s especially hard to ignore with The Crow, which is all style over substance to an irresponsible, arguably unethical degree, as it’s an unapologetic revenge fantasy promoting an ethical system that, if taken to its logical conclusion, probably produces an endless cycle of violence. I mean, The Crow comes back to life, kills the thugs, who I’m sure had kids of their own, and those kids are likely to seek revenge for the deaths of their thug parents, turning them into little avengers themselves, which will no doubt lead to more violence, which will only produce more little avengers, and so on and so forth. Such is the cycle of retribution, and you know what they say: an eye for an eye, no more eyes, or whatever.

Upon first read, it’s easy to think that the violence in The Crow is justified, especially when you’re an edgy teenager. After all, Eric Draven, The Crow, had been shot in the head by thugs before becoming The Crow, and this headshot didn’t kill him immediately, only paralyzed him, leaving him conscious enough to watch the thugs do awful things to his wife before finishing her off. Eric, with a hole in the back of his head, watched all this terrible shit happen to his wife, and it filled him with rage and despair. He becomes a hungry ghost, starving for revenge. The idea here is that Eric cannot go peacefully into that good night without first wreaking serious havoc on those who wronged him. And in some ways, he’s also like a karmic consequence made manifest, distilled to its purest form, that is, if you kill someone, The Crow will come back from the dead and kill you, like a cautionary tale of retribution, of getting what’s coming to you, of sleeping in the bed you made, all that stuff. So, again, it’s easy to think that the violence is justified. Eric goes out as The Crow and brutally murders all those who wronged him, and, reading it, it feels good, it feels right, like you yourself are the one getting the revenge. You are vicariously killing people through Eric Draven. Watching him torture remorseless thugs as The Crow appeals to some base, primordial urge deep inside, that shoulder-devil whisper to hurt people whenever they hurt you. The revenge feels justified, necessary almost. Certainly, you can’t have these evil thugs roaming the streets; someone has to put them down, and who better to do it than one of their own victims? The moment those thugs raped and killed Eric’s wife was the moment they threw away their Human Race Membership Cards, the moment that “human rights” might as well no longer apply to them because they are no longer part of the “human” category at all. So, you end up cheering Eric on as he’s killing these thugs because, well, these guys are bad dudes, obviously. They deserve it, right? They deserve to have their skulls repeatedly crushed with a hammer or their brains blown out all over the walls or whatever other heinous shit we can think of. And not only do they deserve it, we as readers demand it. We demand our pound of flesh, our revenge; we sit on the edge of our seats, quickly thumbing through pages, demanding violence, drooling as The Crow bashes some dude’s brains out with a hammer. We cannot get enough. The Crow, the comic book, does this to you. It makes you want it. And it delivers. Eric gets his revenge, and it feels great.

Well, it feels great until you close the book and start to think about it for more than two seconds.

By the end of the comic, after Eric kills all the thugs, it is implied that he stops being The Crow because his soul can finally rest or whatever, as if it’s just that simple, as if all you have to do to find peace is just kill all the dudes in your life who have wronged you. If we were to draw a moral from the story, it would be something like this: “Some people are just so bad that they deserve to die, and you might even deserve to be the one who kills them, and yes, killing them will probably make you feel better.” It quickly becomes apparent that one’s enjoyment of The Crow hinges entirely on not analyzing it too much, or at all.

Because when you start to analyze The Crow, you start to feel really weird and conflicted. The whole thing just seems wrong. But it’s hard to explain why it’s wrong. How can it be wrong when, while reading it, it just feels so right? It doesn’t make sense. The thugs deserved it. They raped and killed Eric’s wife, for God’s sake. They threw away their Human Race Membership Cards.

So now, in hindsight, why does killing them feel so wrong? Is it just me?

Take the long-winded hypothetical at the start of this journal entry, for example. I don’t think I could kill the monster, even though I recognize that the guy is a monster and probably shouldn’t be allowed to mingle with civilized people. I still wouldn’t kill him. I don’t know why not. Sometimes I think about Batman, or Spider-Man, or whoever, when they’re given the choice to kill the villain or let them live. This applies to Eric and the Thugs, too. There are many opportunities for Batman to just kill the Joker, for example, yet Batman never does, even though he would face literally no repercussions for doing so. In fact, by killing the Joker, Batman would probably be saving countless lives. So, if you think about it from that perspective, shouldn’t Batman kill the Joker? Would Batman not be at least a little bit culpable for the lives that the Joker takes if Batman were given the chance to kill the Joker but did not take it? I don’t know. Is it that black and white? Batman, after all, is not controlling the Joker. The Joker is his own man. He makes his own choices, and he chooses to kill people. Batman does not choose for the Joker to kill people; the Joker chooses for himself. So why would we ever consider Batman responsible for the Joker’s choices? Is it because we know, as readers of the comic books, that Batman is the only one capable of stopping the Joker, therefore Batman should use his great power to kill the Joker, because otherwise people are going to die, and since Batman knows that, he should therefore kill the Joker? If Batman is passive here, is he responsible for deaths the Joker causes, and by extension, is he responsible for the Joker’s own choices? If so, how far do we take that?

In the real world, couldn’t we apply this argument to all sorts of people? For example, in the case of a certain president, are we all culpable for the deaths of immigrants simply because we haven’t unalived the man ourselves? If we are passive, are we responsible for those deaths? Wouldn’t that make a lot of people responsible? How can so many people be responsible in this case? It doesn’t make any sense. It’s almost meaningless, these words like “culpable” and “responsible.” Semantics, really. I am not responsible for the choices of the president, just as Batman is not responsible for the choices of the Joker. We are only responsible for our own choices. That makes sense to me. But I don’t know. None of this makes any sense, actually. On the one hand, there are arguments for killing the Joker; on the other, there are arguments for not killing the Joker. It’s all a matter of philosophical perspective, I guess.

But perhaps that’s where the problem festers, in philosophical debate. There is a certain passivity in philosophical debate, a certain detachment, where both sides have strong stances on the subject of killing the Joker, for example, but neither side really does anything. Sometimes I think philosophy is less about making cogent points or convincing the other side and more about justifying your position to yourself, to make yourself feel better about a belief that, when you get right down to it, is purely emotional. I think that under all philosophy there is some raw emotion that we either don’t understand or can’t come to grips with for whatever reason. In the Joker example, or the thug example, there’s a raw hatred there, in the gut. You want to kill the Joker, you want to bash the thug’s skull in. There’s something a little gross about this feeling, isn’t there? Now you have to justify why you want to kill the Joker, not to others, but to yourself. And you justify it to yourself by turning the raw emotion into less of an “I want” statement and more of a “We need” statement: “I don’t want to kill the Joker, but we need to kill the Joker because, if not, he will kill lots of people.”

It may sound like a lot of judgment, but I’m just typing up whatever words come to mind here, some of which I might not even agree with tomorrow or in a week or whatever, so there’s no real judgment here. In fact, I think it’s almost impossible for me to say definitively whether we should kill the Joker or the thugs or whatever. What’s not impossible for me to say, however, is this: for me, personally, it feels wrong to kill anyone, even the Joker or the thugs.

In Buddhist mythology, there’s this term they use, “hungry ghost,” used to refer to the spirits of people who died with great jealousy, anger, or negativity in their hearts. In Japanese mythology, these hungry ghosts are doomed to wander the Earth, endlessly seeking sustenance for their insatiable negative-emotion appetites, often shown eating human excrement, sometimes even corpses, in a vain attempt to satiate themselves. These hungry ghosts can never escape samsara, the cyclical process of birth, death, and rebirth, because their souls are forever attached to the material world through their anger and jealousy. A core idea of Buddhism is to break the samsaric cycle by reaching a state of enlightenment, and you supposedly reach this state of enlightenment by eliminating suffering. You eliminate suffering by ridding yourself of desire and attachment, and you do this, supposedly, through focused meditation. Again, hungry ghosts cannot reach a state of enlightenment, because they are still attached to the material world, filled with negative emotions stemming from desire and attachment.

This is not meant to be a primer on Buddhist ideology. I only bring this up because I think it brings me closer to understanding why The Crow feels so wrong to me.

It feels so wrong because Eric Draven is a hungry ghost, filled with the negative desire for revenge, and yet the story implies that only through satiating this negative desire can Eric be at peace. But I don’t think peace, or any semblance of contentedness, can be achieved through fostering the negative emotions that produce a desire for revenge. I know, personally, that I have never felt content after giving in to anger, if anything, I’ve always felt worse after indulging those negative emotions. So I don’t buy for a minute that, by indulging his worst impulses, like bashing a thug’s head in with a hammer, Eric is somehow reaching some state of enlightenment. In fact, it feels like he’s moving away from enlightenment when he indulges these terrible urges. It seems to me that any decision born from negative emotion is a wrong decision. I get that Eric is full of anger and hatred because of all the terrible things that have happened to him, that makes sense, but I don’t think he gets a karmic free pass just because he had a terrible experience. The goal for Eric should be to move past the anger and the hatred, not give in to it. I am not convinced that simply killing all the thugs can satiate Eric’s desire for revenge, because his desire for revenge does not come from the material world, it comes from within.

Eric just needs to let it go, otherwise he’ll be a hungry ghost forever.
f0rrest: (kid pix w/ pkmn cntr)
A few days ago, I finished playing Ni No Kuni: Wrath of the White Witch, which is a kids’ game for kids developed by Level-5 with art and animation done by Studio Ghibli. And I loved it. What a fantastic game. It's got that Pokemon monster-collecting thing going on, a battle system like a hybrid of Tales and Dragon Quest, and it's got vibrant, timeless cel-shaded visuals, and it's even got music composed by Joe Hisaishi, the same guy who does the soundtracks for the Ghibli films. I would say it's one of the classic JRPGs, a literal must-play for fans of the genre. You play as this young kid named Oliver who goes around mending people's broken hearts with the power of love while literally saying stuff like “neato!” and “jeepers creepers!” The whole vibe is so innocent and uplifting and heartwarming, and not in a saccharine way, but in that special Studio Ghibli way, like Castle in the Sky mixed with Kiki’s Delivery Service, or Howl’s Moving Castle but Howl is like 10 years old and not a total asshole. Ni No Kuni sits right up there in the Ghibli pantheon of greatness. There's a beautiful city filled with fish-themed imagery ruled by cats called Ding Dong Dell, and a desert town called Al Mamoon ruled by a gigantic cow, just to give you an example of the greatness. It was a total joy to play. It took me like 58 hours over the span of a month to complete. And I really should have played it sooner, but in 2013, when the game originally came out, I was far more dark and edgy than I am now, if you can believe that; back then all the childish whimsy put me off playing it, but not now, not anymore, because now, now I love children, but not in a Michael Jackson sort of way, in a spiritual, reverent sort of way.

The main character, Oliver, who’s supposedly 13 but looks 9 or 10, illustrates all the reasons as to why I love children: their carefree attitudes, their innocence, their resilience, their simplicity, their willingness to learn, their aloofness toward the passage of time, their general sense of wonder, and especially their ability to tell right from wrong without even really thinking about it. It also helps that Oliver looks a lot like my son, with his thick orange hair and pale rosy cheeks, which makes the character especially endearing to me.

One thing I really love about Oliver is that, when bad guys come around with all their philosophical rationalizations for their bad-guy ways, he’s just like, “Uh, you can't just do that, that's mean,” offering no philosophical counterargument as to why the bad guys are mean, just that they are, period. And why should he posit a counterargument? He's a kid. He doesn’t need to. He just knows, in his gut, that the bad guys are doing bad things, usually because they’re hurting people, and Oliver just instinctively sort of knows that you aren't supposed to hurt people, because that’s mean, duh. It’s that simple for Oliver. He doesn’t need to sit around pontificating about why the bad guys are mean, he doesn’t need to morally justify his position. He’s a kid. He just knows injustice when he sees it. He doesn't have to think about it too much. He just knows that he doesn’t need a reason to help people.

I think, nowadays, people think they need a reason to help people. Oliver just helps people. Maybe we can learn something from Oliver.

And granted, a lot of these JRPG protagonists do this sort of thing, this whole good-for-goodness’-sake thing, they say the bad guys are wrong without explaining why, without justifying themselves, but when other protagonists do this it sometimes feels a little shallow, especially when the protagonist is an adult, who you would expect some cogent reasoning from; and sometimes, in these other games, the protagonist's lack of argument, their silence, leaves you sympathizing with the villain a little bit, like “Huh, maybe the bad guy is right; he was tortured in a prison for three years after all, maybe he does have some good points, maybe humanity does cause a lot of suffering, maybe we are sick and evil and deserve to die.” But no, to Oliver, that’s obviously wrong, and coming from Oliver, this sometimes-shallow retort of “you can't just do that, that’s wrong” doesn't feel shallow at all, because Oliver’s literally a kid, he practices gut morality, he doesn’t need a reason to help people; he sees something that he feels is messed up and immediately calls it out as messed up without even thinking about it. He knows that you can’t just blow up the world because humanity is bad sometimes. To Oliver, that’s obviously wrong. And he doesn’t need a reason for why it’s wrong; I mean, he literally goes around saying stuff like “neato!” and “jeepers creepers!” for God's sake. He just knows mean stuff is wrong. He just knows you don’t go around killing people. You don’t just go around enslaving people. You don’t just go around blowing stuff up. Obviously, these things are wrong. Why are they wrong, you ask? Who cares. They just are. Deal with it, bad guy. For Oliver, there’s no utilitarian death calculus going on, there’s no “well, if we blow up this city now, we may save lives later” or “if we don’t round up all the illegal immigrants now, some of them might commit murders later” type of thing. Oliver doesn’t think about trolley problems. He just knows stuff is wrong. And this sort of begs the question, if a kid like Oliver knows this stuff is obviously wrong, why don’t so many adults in the real world know it?

Why are powerful people all over the world sitting around in their high castles giving the green light to enslave, bomb, and torture people on the daily? Why are these powerful people always doing things that every kid in the world knows are wrong? They often cite things like “the greater good,” but bro, you are literally killing people. Maybe they’ve forgotten something. Maybe they’ve forgotten what it's like to be a kid? “But, but, you have to consider the geopolitics involved, and the oil, and there are bad guys over there, and we have to consider the long-term survivability of our country, and the well-being of our people, resources aren’t unlimited you know, and, and, and.” No. No you don’t. What you are doing is obviously wrong. You don’t hurt people. Oliver seems to know this. Most kids seem to know this. So why don’t our world leaders seem to know this?

I know what you’re about to say. You’re about to say, “but the world isn’t so simple.” But why not? Why isn’t it so simple? Is it truly the resources, the bad guys, the geopolitics, or are those just excuses, excuses for the fact that we all seem to have forgotten what it’s like to be a kid?

In Ni No Kuni, in the cutscene right after the final battle with the White Witch, when she’s on her knees lamenting over her defeat at the hands of a literal child, and she’s doing the whole bad-guy-rationalization thing, saying, verbatim, “No, why? This world is imperfect. It must be destroyed so that a new one may begin,” Oliver simply responds with, “No. You can’t just tear it up and start over. It may not be perfect, but nothing is, so you make the best of what you’ve got. When things go wrong, you have to try to make them right,” and that’s it, that’s his grand speech, like he’s delivering lines to four-year-olds in an episode of Barney or something. And do you know what the White Witch does? She literally starts crying.

What I’m saying is, maybe some of these powerful world-leader-type people could learn something from a child like Oliver. Maybe we all could.

I think the next time some powerful world leader is presented with the option of bombing some town in the Middle East or something, maybe they should stop to think, “What would my children think of me doing this?” And if they don’t have kids, perhaps they should think instead, “What would I think about this if I were still a child?” And perhaps then we might be closer to making a world suitable for children, because, when we get right down to it, that should be the goal: a world suitable for children. Because, right now, we are far, far away from that world; instead, we are in a world suitable for adults who are trained as quickly as possible on forgetting what it’s like to be children.

We should try to remember.

And that’s another thing I like about Ni No Kuni: Oliver never grows up. He’s a kid the whole time. And, contrary to what so many other coming-of-age stories about young kids try to do, the ending of the game doesn’t force this whole “now it’s time for Oliver to put his big boy pants on and get a real job” thing. He’s literally a kid the whole time. I mean, upon delivering the final blow to the White Witch, while standing in a literal void realm of death, Oliver can still be heard saying “neato!” for Christ’s sake. My point being, despite his long, arduous journey, Oliver has not become jaded or cynical or hardened by the world. He has not adopted an “adult” mentality. I mean, he has learned some things, but his outlook has not changed; he has not “grown up” per se. And this is refreshing. I’m tired of all these “grow up” narratives in media. 

I think people should try to be childlike forever.

They say youth is wasted on the young, that kids never appreciate being kids. They say this is a tragedy. But I disagree. This is only a tragedy in hindsight, when you’re an adult. As a child, it’s not tragic at all; in fact, for a child to stop and appreciate their youth, they would first need to acknowledge the transience of youth, the death clock, how time is always ticking away, how things are always decaying, and this is not something that children need concern themselves with. The whole “youth is wasted on the young” thing implies that the only way to appreciate something is by being fully aware of it, that only by knowing something will end can you truly enjoy it. But that’s an adult idea, born from nostalgia and loss. And it’s bullshit. A child doesn’t need to savor the moment to enjoy it; all they need to do is live in it, in the moment, and that’s what they do: they live in the moment, unconcerned with the passing of time and its implications, and this is a beautiful thing, a beautiful thing we should all try to do.

And besides, age is just a number. You can be a kid at any time.

Try it sometime.


f0rrest: (Default)
After much deliberation, I have come to the conclusion that I guess I would have been a Nazi.

Yes, I know that opening sentence is inflammatory, click-baity even, but please bear with me, because I think this topic, which is actually more of a hypothetical thought experiment, is really worth discussing, as it reveals something about our personal ethics.

Last night, a friend and I were talking about current events, particularly the ICE situation, and the conversation inevitably landed on Nazi Germany. After some lengthy back and forth, the conclusion we came to was that, yes, back in the 1940s, if I had been a German citizen, I would have likely been a Nazi, maybe not ideologically, but I would have been labeled one.

And yes, again, I know this sounds really evil. And maybe it is, I don’t know. I'm still unsure myself. The question of “good” and “evil” was actually the catalyst for this whole conversation, which is something I’ll get into here shortly.

But first, some background. On March 16, 1935, Adolf Hitler introduced universal conscription, basically a draft: any man between the ages of 18 and 45 was subject to military service. Those who denied the call to serve the Nazi war machine were labeled Wehrdienstverweigerer, or “military service refuser,” arrested by the Gestapo, and prosecuted for Kriegsverrat, or “treason in wartime.” And it wasn’t just the refusers who were labeled as traitors, but also their families, the Nazis called this idea “Sippenhaft,” the idea that if someone defied Hitler, that person’s entire family shared moral guilt. The Nazis used this idea to prosecute the families of traitors, evicting them, imprisoning them, and sometimes even sending them to concentration camps.

So, back to my friend’s and my conversation, which was prompted by the recent murders carried out by ICE agents, which we both agreed were unjust and awful. During that conversation, my friend said something that bothered me. He said, “Anyone who works for ICE is evil.” I didn’t, and still don’t, agree with this assertion. Being pretentiously entrenched in Buddhist ideology, I told him that, first, this idea of “good” and “evil” is a harmful duality, that simply labeling people “evil” leads to bad outcomes, as it dehumanizes people and leaves no room for nuance. Second, I told him that these things are more complicated than they seem, that not everyone has a choice in their occupation. To this, my friend retorted, “Sure they do, everyone has a choice; they either enlist for ICE or they don’t. It’s that simple.” And sure, in our current time, maybe he’s right, maybe it is that simple, after all, there is no ICE draft, so maybe he got me there. But, being stubborn, I thought the point I was trying to make was still valid, though I might have been using a bad example, so I posited a hypothetical to try to illustrate my point further. I said, “Let’s say there’s a draft, and all people between this and that age are subject to serve ICE. Would you dodge this draft, labeling yourself a traitor and potentially landing yourself in prison, or would you enlist?” And he said, “Of course I would dodge the draft. What kind of question is that? That’s the only right thing to do.” And I said, “What if, in dodging the draft, your family would also be labeled traitors, and they too would be thrown in prison?” I was trying to illustrate my original point: that these things are more complicated than they seem. And still he said, “I would do the right thing and dodge the draft.” To which I said, “But is that truly the right thing to do here? Isn’t there now more at stake than just yourself?” And he said, “Maybe, but you should always act in accordance with your values and the greater good of society.” So I said, “Even if it gets your family killed?” And it was at this point that my friend assumed, I guess, that I was defending ICE, so he brought Nazis into the mix to illustrate his own point, as evoking Nazis is often the most extreme rhetorical move one can make in these types of debates, so he said, “You’re pretty much saying that if you lived in Nazi Germany, you would be a Nazi.” And me, having a wife and two children, I said, “Yes, maybe I would.” And he said, “Wouldn’t that compromise your values, make you feel terrible?” And I said, “Maybe, but I think I would feel worse if my wife and children died in a concentration camp.” And that’s kind of where we left it.

The whole point I was trying to make was that I have a hard time labeling someone as “evil” without understanding the full systems at play or the person’s entire decision-making process. Like the example above, if there were a draft and your family could be punished if you refused this draft, are you comfortable refusing the draft? At that point, you would not only be making a choice for yourself but also for your entire family, and this choice comes with heavy consequences for everyone involved. Is it fair to force such a choice, such a consequence, on your entire family? In refusing the draft, you may feel good about having stood up for your ideals, but will your son feel good when he’s dying in a concentration camp? “I may be starving, but at least my dad stood up for what he believed.” Sure, you could take your family and try to flee the country, but this also carries a huge risk. And sure, you could say that, in refusing the draft, you’re not the one actually sending your family to the concentration camp, the Nazi state is, and that’s true, you didn’t create the diabolical systems at play here, and those who did create it are more likely the “evil” ones in this scenario, but it’s also true that you’re aware of the consequences in this situation, you’re aware of the fact that if you refused to enlist then your family might be killed, and given you have that awareness of the consequences, your choice now carries a certain responsibility, specifically a responsibility for the wellbeing of your family. So, knowing the consequences, would you still choose to risk your family’s lives, for your own personal ideals? Ideals that, in the grand scheme of things, won’t make any difference? If you refuse the draft, what happens? You die, your family potentially dies, and then the Nazis just recruit some other dude to fight for them, and thus the war machine rages on. Is this individual act of defiance truly worth it?

The potential responses to the draft may be simple in principle, either “yes” or “no,” but the decision tree for those responses is not so simple. You could deny the draft and potentially get your family killed, maybe run away, take your family with you, or you could compromise your values, enlist, and fight for the Nazis, at which point maybe you could do a bad job on purpose, avoid killing people on the battlefield or whatever, sneakily clinging to your idealism while working within the confines of the diabolical system. But which choice is the right one here? It seems morally abhorrent to join the Nazi army, but it also seems morally abhorrent to knowingly risk the lives of your family by not joining the Nazi army.

At some point in the conversation with my friend, I got the impression that he was just not getting it, that maybe my hypothetical was too complicated. So I crafted a new one, a distilled version. I said, “let’s say the Nazis gather you and your family up, put you in a room, hold a gun to your head, then tell you, ‘join the Nazi army right now or I kill you and your entire family.’ What would you do in that situation?” But my friend refused to engage in this new hypothetical; he didn’t even bother to answer the question, instead he said, “That’s ridiculous, that would never happen.”

Oh, but it did happen, my friend. It happened all the time. In Nazi Germany, there may have been a few levels of abstraction between the guns and the heads of your loved ones, but the guns were still squarely pointed there. This happened to millions of people back then. So, knowing this, can we truly call a man “evil” if he’s simply doing what’s best for his family?

I would love to say that if I had been a citizen in Nazi Germany, I would have rebelled against the fascist government and died for my ideals, and maybe I would have done this if I were a single guy with no dependents. But are things ever that simple?

Like the concepts of “good” and “evil,” we often approach these situations from a black-and-white perspective, which leaves no room for nuance, and I believe this kind of thinking leads us down a dark path, a path in which we view those who don’t always make the “morally righteous” choices as vile monsters deserving of nothing more than death.

And is this not the same path as the Nazi ideology, a path totally devoid of empathy?

mr. cig

Jan. 14th, 2026 10:47 pm
f0rrest: (Default)
Today I want to tell you about the tale of Mr. Cig.

In the early 1950s, the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, founded in 1875 and famous for its Camel, Newport, and Pall Mall brand cigarettes, faced a big problem: public suspicion about tobacco was growing and, most importantly, sales were going down. So, they were forced to come up with a plan to save the company, and they had to come up with it fast.

Although physicians had long suspected links between smoking tobacco and respiratory disease, these suspicions were largely ignored until 1950, when epidemiologists Richard Doll and Austin Bradford Hill published a breakthrough study showing an undeniable link between smoking tobacco and lung cancer. This study, of course, threw the entire tobacco industry into a panic. The best tobacco minds in the world came together to figure out a way to discredit this damning new information. They cut lucrative deals with the film industry, placing branded cigarettes between the fingers of every glamorous movie star; they tripled spending on public advertising, ensuring every billboard and city bus was plastered with the smiling faces of smokers; they even ran blatant disinformation campaigns on public radio, discrediting Doll and Hill as quacks. But no matter what the tobacco companies did, sales still went down. Sales were plummeting, in fact. That is, until one day in 1951, John C. Whitaker, President of the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, after many fruitless internal meetings, stumbled upon a brilliant idea entirely by accident.

And that idea was: Mr. Cig.

As told in a famous anecdote published in a local paper in 1951, John C. Whitaker, out of ideas during an internal board meeting, scribbled a quick drawing on his cocktail napkin. The scribble was like that of a child’s: a giant cigarette man with black-circle eyes and a curved-line smile, holding out a lit cigarette twirling with little smoke lines to a crudely drawn child lying in what looked to be a hospital bed. At first, Whitaker thought nothing of the drawing until, as outlined verbatim in the aforementioned local paper, an executive sitting next to him eyed the napkin and asked, “What’s that you’ve sketched there, then?” to which Mr. Whitaker famously replied, “Well, good sir, that there is Mr. Cig.”

It was decided right then and there that Mr. Cig would become the new mascot of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco. The idea was that Mr. Cig would go to local hospitals and hand out free cigarettes to the infirm, some of whom would be children, emphasizing the calming, anxiety-reducing effects of smoking tobacco, which the physicians employed by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. linked to faster patient recovery, as there was some evidence that a calm, positive mind improved physical well-being. This idea was hailed as genius, and plans quickly progressed. The company immediately hired a local seamstress to craft the Mr. Cig costume. She simulated the cigarette paper with white cloth, wrapping it tightly around a giant tube of thick particle board; then she took real wood, charred it gray and black with fire, and painted the top orangish-red to simulate a lit cherry; then used industrial-strength plastic to create a bowl-like structure, which she glued to the top of the costume with industrial-strength adhesive; then she glued the faux-smoldering wood into the bowl, which completed the overall structure; but it was still missing something: the smiling, cartoon-like face, which was crucial to appealing to sick people, especially sick children; so she took large pieces of black felt, two circles and a curve, and glued them just below the faux-smoldering wood; then, as a last step, she cut two holes into the costume where a human’s arms would stick out, which was a crucial feature, as Mr. Cig would not be able to hand out cigarettes without arms. This process took weeks of toiling, but the seamstress completed the costume before the deadline. The costume was then reviewed by the entire R.J. Reynolds Tobacco marketing division, who collectively deemed it good.

But before Mr. Cig could tour the hospitals, there was one final question: who, exactly, would don the costume? Who would have the honor of becoming Mr. Cig?

Well, the bad news is, to this day, the identity of the original Mr. Cig is a mystery. Some believe it was the head of the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco marketing division, William Slocum, who was a strong believer in the Mr. Cig project and very involved in the planning. Others believe it was John C. Whitaker inside that giant, cartoon-like cigarette man costume. Some suggest it was the ghost of R.J. Reynolds himself, making one last cancer-causing sales pitch from beyond the grave. What’s more likely, however, is that the original Mr. Cig was simply a low-level employee from the R.J. Reynolds marketing division who was perhaps voluntold to don the costume, but even if true, that employee’s name has unfortunately been lost to time.

What we do know, however, is that throughout the remainder of the 1950s, Mr. Cig, with his big smiling cartoon face and faux-smoldering cherry topper, traveled across the United States from hospital to hospital, handing out free cigarettes to the sick and infirm, some of whom were children and many of whom were dying from the very same lung cancer caused by the cigarettes themselves. Mr. Cig was also prepped with various pro-tobacco talking points, many of which were backed by sketchy scientific data provided by physicians paid by Big Tobacco, and he would rattle off these talking points to every doctor and patient he visited. Sometimes he would even leave them with whole cartons of free cigarettes, which were accepted most graciously because the immediate calming effects of the tobacco did indeed alleviate patient suffering in the short term, albeit only unknowingly hastening their demise in the long term. Of course, Mr. Cig was aware of this but, being a faithful servant of the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, he continued carrying out his reaper-like duties without question. But Mr. Cig did not just give out free cigarettes and pro-smoking rhetoric, as that would not be very profitable; he also set up cigarette machines in each hospital he visited, and these cigarette machines sold products at a high markup to leech as much money from the dying patients as possible, all while the hospitals received a small cut of the profits.

It is impossible to say how many lives were lost as a result of Mr. Cig’s efforts, but one thing is certain: what Mr. Cig did was utterly detestable. We can say this for certain because it is true.

Or is it?

Well, it is certainly true that if Mr. Cig had indeed handed out cigarettes to dying hospital patients, that would have been considered utterly detestable. The negative health impacts of smoking tobacco are well-documented and backed by decades of research, and there was strong evidence of this even back in the 1950s. But the problem is, Mr. Cig did not hand out cigarettes to dying hospital patients at all, because Mr. Cig never existed, or at least I am pretty sure he never existed. The story above, about Mr. Cig, is an elaborate fabrication on my part, based on supposedly real information documented in a single article posted online on November 24, 2025. You can read it in archive format here. It is roughly two paragraphs long and contains a supposedly real picture of Mr. Cig handing a lit cigarette to a hospital patient circa 1948. But as far as I can tell, this picture does not depict reality, and the events outlined never actually happened. There is no real evidence whatsoever backing up the existence of Mr. Cig outside of this short shock article, which itself has no citations.

But the problem here is not so much that Mr. Cig did not exist, or that the vintag.es article is blatantly lying to us; it is that, even now, after doing a bunch of research, I am still not sure if Mr. Cig existed or not.

When my friend sent me the Mr. Cig article via text message with the question, “Do you think this is real?”, I went down a sort of online rabbit hole to find out the truth, and I got stuck in that rabbit hole for about an hour. Most of my research was spent doing keyword searches, trying to find older articles to corroborate the Mr. Cig story he had sent me, but I could not find anything dated before 2025. I even checked the Wikipedia articles for various tobacco companies, playing fast and loose with the Ctrl+F hotkey on phrases like “Mr. Cig,” “Mr. Ciggy,” “mascot,” and whatnot, but that too was a fruitless exercise. I found a Facebook post that referenced the same article, and I found a Reddit post too, wherein people just accepted the story at face value because, hell, it seems like something a tobacco company would actually do. But I could find no real historical record of Mr. Cig. He did not seem to exist. I got to thinking that, if there is no real evidence, how come people seem to just believe this story to be true? And that’s when it hit me: people believe this to be true because, accompanying the article, there is a seemingly real picture of Mr. Cig, and this picture looks very realistic: black and white, showing a correctly proportioned man with an era-appropriate hairstyle, and the hospital bed looks as if it could have been from the 1940s or 1950s. Photos add credibility; they trick our senses in a way, make us put our cynical guards down. The only truly weird thing about the photo is Mr. Cig himself who, although creepy as hell, looks real enough, certainly not outside the realm of possibility. And there were no obvious alterations to the photo, at least not that I noticed upon first or second glance. But after seeing the photo a third time, it hit me: based on the location of the spiraling smoke lines, Mr. Cig is handing the man a lit cigarette with the lit end facing out, meaning that if the man grabbed the cigarette, he would burn himself. I thought to myself, surely the esteemed Mr. Cig, a paragon of cigarette-smoking excellence, would not hand a cigarette to someone in this way; certainly he knew the basic etiquette of passing a cigarette. And that’s when I knew that the photo of Mr. Cig was AI-generated.

But the problem was, even after coming to this conclusion, I felt that I was still no closer to the truth. Upon emerging from the Mr. Cig research rabbit hole, I was actually more confused than when I had first jumped into the hole. I found that, on the one hand, there’s strong evidence that Mr. Cig did not exist, considering the lack of historical record and the AI-generated photo, and it’s no coincidence that Mr. Cig only started showing up in 2025, the year photorealistic AI-generated images became a thing. But on the other hand, there is nothing saying otherwise. In fact, everyone online seems to think that Mr. Cig was a real mascot who actually handed out free cigarettes at hospitals. And, if enough people believe something, does that make it true? Does consensus dictate reality? Although I believe it very likely that Mr. Cig is a total fabrication, it now seems impossible for me to know for certain, and this disturbs me because it reveals something about the world we live in, something dark and twisted.

It reveals that we live in a world of falsehoods, an era of post-truth.

I’m not the greatest storyteller in the world, but the story I crafted up there, about Mr. Cig, was intended to be believable although entirely misleading. For example, I researched and used historical facts like the names of the actual people who worked at R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. circa 1950, per public record, and I even referenced a real research paper published by Richard Doll and Austin Bradford Hill. I did this because these types of factual details add a layer of believability to the Mr. Cig story, even though everything around those facts was totally made up. I was weaving fact with falsehood on purpose, not only to foster a sense of credibility with the reader but also to make a point. That being, this is a very common rhetorical trick used in journalism. People are more likely to eat bullshit if it’s hidden within a tasty-looking meal. But this is just the first layer of falsehood. In the year 2026, it goes much deeper than that.

In the past, if you were so inclined, you could simply fact-check the story, look things up about it online, go through an exercise similar to the one I outlined in the previous paragraphs to determine a story’s veracity, but nowadays the facts are not so clear-cut. Often you will find conflicting sources supporting both sides of whatever it is you’re researching. On the one hand, this has always been the case, especially since the advent of the internet and the echo chambers spawned from it, but nowadays, with the advent of AI, a bullshit term I’m only using because it’s common tongue, it’s incredibly easy for someone to generate a very real-sounding story and post it online. And to make it worse, as of at least 2025, it’s also now incredibly easy to generate a very real-looking photo to accompany that very real-sounding, albeit totally fabricated, story. Someone could even use AI to generate a real-looking research paper in PDF format to support the details of their fake story. So now, not only are we contending with tricky journalism and internet echo chambers, we’re also contending with totally fake but seemingly factual data that’s incredibly simple to generate. And the technology is only getting better. Just a year ago, AI-generated photos were full of obvious errors and telling glossy sheens, but now, as of the year 2025, ChatGPT can spit out photorealistic images that are nearly indistinguishable from those taken with the highest-end cameras, and we’re also seeing high-quality AI-generated videos and audio recordings. Meaning, with each passing day, it’s becoming harder and harder to discern fact from fiction. We are now living in a post-truth era.

You may be thinking something like, “Well, I can tell the difference,” but what about your crazy aunt on Facebook who keeps sharing fake stories about how Elon Musk created a tiny-home colony for people on Mars, can she tell the difference? And what about your hyper-conservative grandpa who keeps sharing stories about how all the 2024 Kamala Harris presidential rally photos were themselves AI-generated? And what about the countless people who share obviously AI-generated recipes, or innocuous, feel-good fake stories about dogs saving babies from being locked in hot cars or whatever? A few years ago, this kind of stuff was obvious, but now? Now it’s almost impossible to tell. Hell, there’s a whole subreddit called “Is it AI?” wherein people debate back and forth about the veracity of some very real-looking stuff. More and more, people are unable to tell the difference between reality and irreality.

Your first gut reaction to this might be to treat everything you read, see, and hear as fiction until sufficiently proven otherwise, but this line of thinking actually does you a disservice, because there will come a day when something you read will be very relevant to your life, yet you won’t believe it because, well, everything around you might be AI-generated, so why would you believe anything? And even if you do believe something, who’s to say that the people around you believe it? They’re drowning in the AI-generated slop swamp just like you, so they’ve been conditioned not to believe anything too. Hell, there may come a day when, let’s say, the president of the United States kills someone on live television, but who’s to say that the recording wasn’t just AI? What’s to stop the president himself from claiming that the recording was AI? In that case, perhaps half the country will believe the president and the other half won’t, but in reality, due to the level of AI-generated obfuscation going on in the world, neither side will truly know what happened.

This is the danger we are putting ourselves in. Mr. Cig is just the tip of the iceberg.

In this post-truth era, how long do you think you will be able to tell the difference between fact and fiction?

How long, do you think, until Mr. Cig tricks you?


f0rrest: (kid pix static)
“Turns out, if you're brave enough, you can make the real world… your Overworld.”

As Jack Black would say, my son yearns for the mines. He’s 2.8 years old and loves A Minecraft Movie. He stands on top of our living-room coffee table shouting CHICKEN JOCKEY and singing the Lava Chicken song. And he asks to watch the movie every day.

And that’s fine. It entertains him, which is a hard thing to do considering he’s inherited all my worst attention-deficit qualities, meaning, for me, the movie is a brief respite from his normal hyperactive madness. But by extension, considering he watches the movie every day, I've watched A Minecraft Movie maybe six hundred times by now, or at least it’s felt that way, because, despite its fairly standard runtime, it’s an excruciatingly torturous experience that feels much longer than it actually is. This is especially true on rewatches, when you start to notice how the plot is totally contrived, how most of the characters exist for no real reason, and how the pacing resembles my son’s own hyperactive thought-process, which is probably why he likes the movie so much. For example, the first forty-five minutes of the film, before they even enter the Minecraft world, are set in the real world, introduce a bunch of characters that do not matter to the plot whatsoever, and play out like a poor recreation of Napoleon Dynamite, cutting from one weird scene to another very quickly, complete with forced-quirky humor that feels like it was focus-grouped in the early 2000s, with lines delivered by middle-aged women like, “You can bag me up and take me to the curb anytime, but you gotta bungee the lid 'cause I got a lot of raccoons in there,” which feels highly inappropriate considering this is a fucking kids’ movie.

I don’t really want to harp on all the problems with the movie because there are way too many to count, and because that’s not really the point of this journal entry, and also because A Minecraft Movie is a kids’ movie first and foremost, so who the fuck actually cares. But I feel it’s important to let you know that this same take-me-to-the-curb woman later becomes romantically involved with a Minecraft villager who has a huge nose and massive block head that look as if human flesh has been stretched way too tightly over them, and he communicates only in creepy, sometimes pained grunts. The whole thing amounts to total nightmare fuel. In fact, most of the CGI in this movie is total nightmare fuel, as all the denizens of the Minecraft world have fleshy, real-world texturing over their clearly video-game-like block bodies, sometimes with nasty little hairs poking out here and there, which makes for some seriously unsettling imagery that could have only come from the mind of one seriously disturbed individual, presumably Jared Hess, the director, who also directed, you guessed it, Napoleon Dynamite.

Of course, much like the first forty-five minutes of A Minecraft Movie and the weird interspecies-romance subplot, everything I’ve typed up so far is pretty much irrelevant to both the plot of the movie and the point I’m trying to make with this journal entry, which is that, despite being a video-game movie made for kids, it tries to shoehorn what I feel is a very anti-kids message, which is what I'm about to get into here. And this message disturbs me because it mirrors something that I think about and wrestle with literally every day. It is something that I think no child should be forced to think about, especially when they just tuned in to watch Jack Black do funny things in a world inspired by their favorite video game, Minecraft.

But before I can analyze the overall message of the film, which is actually very deliberate, not something the script accidentally stumbles into, I have to provide some background for two of the more important characters.

The first important character is, of course, Steve. Steve’s story is one of escapism. The movie opens with a montage of Steve throughout the years. He starts as a young child who, for whatever reason, yearns for the mines, observing them from afar, dreaming of the day when he can get into those caves and do some digging or whatever. But before long, real life kicks in, and suddenly Steve, now a grotesque fat man in his thirties, is a paper pusher at some corporate office, depressed and without purpose. “My name is Steve. And as a child, I yearned for the mines. But it didn't really work out. So, I did a terrible thing. I grew up.” Toward the end of the montage, Steve has a little epiphany, so he quits his job to follow his dream. From that point, he spends all his free time mining in a nearby quarry, eventually unearthing a glowing blue cube, the Earth Crystal, which opens a portal to the Overworld, i.e. the Minecraft world, where he spends the next several years mining, crafting, and building stuff, basically escaping his real-world responsibilities. In the Overworld, he makes a wolf friend named Dennis, and at some point, he discovers an underworld full of pig-like monsters commanded by Malgosha, an evil piglin sorceress. Things happen and Malgosha captures Steve, demanding that he give her the Earth Crystal so that she can take over the universe or whatever, but Steve refuses, sending Dennis off with the Earth Crystal to hide it in the real world beyond the portal. This leads into the start of the movie, where the whole Napoleon Dynamite rip-off kicks in.

The second important character is Garrett “The Garbage Man” Garrison, played by that same guy who did Game of Thrones and Aquaman or whatever, Jason Momoa. Before the events of the film, he was a child video-game prodigy, having won many video game tournaments and corporate sponsorships, which set him up for financial success and inflated his ego to an absurd degree. However, by the start of the film, he’s squandered all his sponsorship money and is now a washed-up, overweight, mullet-wearing middle-aged man who owns a retro video game store aptly named “Game Over World.” Maybe you can see where this is going. His store is filled to the brim with old stuff from his youth: classic video game consoles, arcade cabinets, ancient CRTs, retro boomboxes, that sort of stuff. One gets the impression that Garrett is a nostalgia junkie obsessed with his childhood. He’s much like that one character from Napoleon Dynamite, the ex-football-player uncle who points at the far-off mountains and says, “How much you wanna bet I can throw a football over them mountains?” Both of these characters live in the past, refusing to move on from their glory days. In fact, all Garrett ever talks about is how he was once the greatest video-game player in the world, which is played for laughs, as Garrett does have some self-awareness about his situation, constantly trying to downplay his boasting by pretending that he doesn’t actually care: “Gamer of the Year, 1989. Whatever. I barely think about it.” Yet despite this, he’s started a mentorship program for people who want to “win at the game of life,” using his own life as a model, even though his own life is in shambles because he is stuck, unable to move on from his glory days. Now, his store is being foreclosed on, and his obnoxious arrogance has made him few friends. After a series of incredibly stupid events, he stumbles into the Minecraft world, where he quickly realizes that he can use Minecraft-world diamonds to make a profit and thus save his soon-to-be-foreclosed retro game store, Game Over World.

Watching this movie, as an adult man in his thirties, I am reminded of my own follies. This is what so disturbs me about the film. In Garrett, I see myself. In Steve, I see myself. This may sound ridiculous, considering this is a kids’ movie for kids, but it is true nevertheless. Like Garrett, my office is my Game Over World. I have games in here from my childhood, from the early 2000s, collecting dust on bookshelves and tables, like a shrine to my youth. In a drawer just to the left of me: jewel-case copies of all the PlayStation Final Fantasy games, Chrono Cross, Arc the Lad, and SaGa Frontier; original Xbox games in their cheap plastic cases, like Panzer Dragoon, Halo, Mega Man Anniversary, and Morrowind; even some old issues of Nintendo Power from the days when I wore a bowl cut. Even further left, on a wooden table that holds my Xbox 360 and Nintendo Switch, old 360 games stand upright between bookends: Fable, Skyrim, Orange Box, Blue Dragon, Oblivion, and more. Next to that, favorite DVDs I’ve had since I was a rebellious teenager: the whole Cowboy Bebop collection, Lost in Translation, the entire Boondocks series, the movie Collateral starring Jamie Foxx and Tom Cruise, and so on, all stacked atop each other, their spines facing out, creating a border of nostalgia around the one thing that helps me escape reality: the television set.

Like Steve, I find myself inexplicably drawn to the television, becoming sucked into the pixely glow. I try to fight it, tell myself that gaming has run its course, that it doesn’t bring me the same pleasure it once did, that I could be doing anything else with my time, but night after night I still find myself sitting there, in front of the screen, burning my retinas with the colors of escapism. There is no moderation in my hobbies. I play till ungodly hours. I eschew other things I’d like to be doing, like reading and writing, to stare into this nostalgic glow. I have reached an age where the act of playing video games triggers thoughts of wasted time and irresponsibility, yet there I am, night after night, still doing it, still playing the games, surrounded by all the old things I love. I foster times and places redolent of those long past, not to remind me of them, but to hide within them. I do this every night, to forget, or perhaps to run away from, what I have become, what we all eventually become.

They say age is just a number, that you can be young forever, but at a certain age, the shadow of responsibility catches up with you, and before you know it, maturity has slain the child inside. Your thinking changes, becomes more pragmatic and wise, and while this is enlightening in some ways, it is also scary as hell. What am I to do with myself? Who am I to become? Am I contributing to society in a meaningful way? What is a “meaningful way,” actually? Why do I tell myself that it doesn’t matter when I know, deep down, that it does? The nihilistic excuses start slipping away, replaced by some vague feeling of expectations being missed, but these expectations are not the expectations of your parents, or your teachers, or your boss, but of someone else entirely: you. They are your own expectations, dormant for years, coming to greet you. And the greeting is most unwelcome.

In this way, it is not A Minecraft Movie that disturbs me, but this: my own maturity.

But herein lies my problem with A Minecraft Movie. It is not that the movie has poor pacing, or that the writing is frankly abysmal, or all the weird sexual innuendos, or even the fleshy block people, or how everything looks obviously green-screened. It is that the movie, which is targeted toward kids, tries hard to make the very kids watching it grow up.

By the end of the movie, as you might imagine, both Steve’s and Garrett’s shadow catches up with them, they mature, they end up renouncing their old escapist ways, abandoning the Minecraft world, which the movie treats as an obvious metaphor for escapism, and basically they get jobs in the real world, and the movie totes this as some existential win for the characters. And maybe it is. Maybe it is an existential win for Steve and Garrett, who have spent most of their adulthood running away from their own responsibilities. Maybe this is a good lesson for the adults watching the film, maybe a win for them. But this is not a win for whom the movie is targeted.

Natalie: Are you sure you don't want to come back?
Steve: Yeah, I'm staying here. I got a bunch more stuff I want to build.
Natalie: Why don't you bring some of that magic to the real world?
(The humans enter the portal as Steve ponders about it. Finally, he makes a decision.)
Steve: Screw it. I’m coming with.
(Finally, he heads into the portal to return to the real world.)
Steve: (voiceover) Turns out, if you're brave enough, you can make the real world… your Overworld. 

When a child goes to sit down in a movie theater to watch a funny movie about their favorite video game, they should not be force-fed some adult narrative about how escapism is terrible and how they should quickly start growing up. Children do not come into the theater thinking about the Game Over World foreclosure notice they just got in the mail. They do not, and should not, think about these things.

So, Mr. Jared Hess, if you’re reading this, I do not like your movie. In fact, I hate it. Stop fucking trying to make kids grow up. You are an asshole.

These are lessons children’s movies should not teach, as they are inappropriate for children. These lessons are things that cannot and should not be taught by corporate media. A child must find these things out for themselves, and when they do, their shadow will have caught up with them, and they will no longer be a child. At that point, they will be something else. And this is not something to celebrate. This is something to mourn. 

Mr. Jared Hess, by subjecting children to your terrible movie, you are hastening the shadow of maturity, and this, I believe, is flat-out evil. So I can only hope that this was an accident, an oversight, rather than your true intent. Otherwise, you sir are a monster.

Stop trying to put kids in Game Over World. This is the domain of adults, not children.



f0rrest: (Default)
A new year dawns, and so too a bunch of promises inevitably broken.

For the record, I think New Year’s resolutions are stupid. I see people make all sorts of New Year’s resolutions that are never realized. I’m going to write a novel. I’m going to stop smoking. I’m going to lose 50 lbs. I’m going to stop drinking. I’m going to stop being so negative all the time. These are things that never work as New Year’s resolutions. I've seen them fail time and time again, with myself and others. It seems to me that a resolution can be made at any time, so why wait until the new year? Why not exercise some willpower earlier in the year? Is there some sort of cosmic willpower-enhancing magic produced when the Earth completes a full rotation around the sun? How long does that magic last? And does that magic only exist at the exact moment of orbit completion? Perhaps there’s no cosmic magic at all; perhaps it’s all symbolic? New year, new you. After all, there’s no real set “complete orbit” in the grand scheme of things; we humans defined the criteria for when an orbit is complete. I could say that the orbit starts in June and ends next June, or February and February, and so on; it’s all societally constructed anyway.

What really gets me is that people will often put off their resolutions until the new year; they know they should stop drinking, but they don’t want to stop drinking right this second because that would be no fun, so they pick some arbitrary date on the Gregorian calendar to stop drinking instead. “I will for sure stop drinking come January 1st, no doubt about it.” And when January 1st comes around, many will have already broken this promise to themselves. “Just a small glass of wine to celebrate the new year, no big deal.” Or, by the time January 1st comes around, they’ll have rationalized the “no drinking” resolution into something more manageable, like “no drinking on weekdays” or something like that. It seems to me that, if one has the thought to “stop drinking,” or whatever, then they should do that thing right then and there, not wait until some random date on a calendar. Otherwise, how serious are they, really? Do they really want to stop drinking, or do they just want to make themselves feel better? And if it’s to make themselves feel better, isn’t this whole thing kind of counterproductive then, considering they'll most definitely feel bad when they inevitably break the resolution?

This is why, every year, I tell myself that I am not going to make any sort of New Year’s resolution. But I’m now realizing that this New Year’s anti-resolution becomes a sort of New Year’s resolution itself because it fits the core definition of one: a promise corresponding to the Earth’s rotation around the sun. Meaning, by telling myself I am not going to have a New Year’s resolution, I am, in fact, setting a New Year’s resolution, meaning I am unwittingly participating in the very thing I am criticizing. And considering my position on New Year’s resolutions, which asserts that all New Year’s resolutions are weak promises inevitably broken, my own “no New Year’s resolution” resolution is doomed to fail, meaning I am bound to set some sort of different New Year’s resolution for myself, although I kind of already have what with the “no New Year’s resolution” resolution, which we already know is bound to fail, which means I am bound to set some sort of different New Year’s resolution, and so on.

You can quickly see how the “no New Year’s resolution” resolution establishes a sort of paradox in which, when the resolution is broken, you end up fulfilling the resolution by breaking it, and when you try to keep it, you break it by keeping it. It is definitionally self-defeating. Perhaps the only way to break the paradox is to stop overthinking it, or just not care. But even that, I guess, becomes its own sort of resolution, meaning you’re kind of fucked either way.

Ultimately, I think the only choice for me here is to stop being so cynical and just set some non-paradoxical resolution like everyone else does. The problem with that, however, is that whenever I tell myself I’m going to do something, the likelihood of me doing the thing goes down considerably. I don’t know why this happens. When I tell myself I am going to write, I end up playing video games; and when I tell myself I am going to play video games, I end up writing; and when I tell myself I am going to read, I end up outside smoking a cigarette while watching mindless YouTube Shorts on my phone. And yes, I realize this is all a matter of willpower, but unfortunately, willpower is a character stat I sorely lack.

This do-the-exact-opposite-of-what-I-tell-myself-I’m-going-to-do paradigm has gotten so bad that I have taken to telling myself to do the thing I don’t really want to do in hopes that the paradigm will kick in and compel me to do the thing I actually want to do; when I want to write, I will tell myself that I am going to play video games instead, hoping that I will betray myself and thus end up writing. But this sort of reverse psychology undermines itself, because of course, I’m aware of the self-trickery going on and thus end up doing the opposite of the opposite, which means I’m right back where I started. However, I have found that this tell-myself-to-do-the-thing-I-don’t-want-to-do-in-hopes-that-I-do-the-thing-I-actually-want-to-do method of psychological self-trickery does, in fact, produce better outcomes than just telling myself to do the things I want to do.

So, this year, I have come up with a list of New Year’s resolutions that I think are just perfect for producing good outcomes, and I will list them below.


Don’t Read Anything, Ever
This year, I aspire to read absolutely nothing. No books. No magazines. No articles. No blog entries. Nothing. Reading is a waste of time, as it fills my head with a bunch of pointless ideas, pointless because, in the cosmic scheme of things, I'm going to die anyway, so who cares. I could be playing video games or watching YouTube Shorts instead of reading a dumb book or whatever.

Give Up Writing Completely
Writing is a stupid waste of time. No one reads any of my stuff anyway. I only started writing in hopes that people would swoon at how smart I am pretending to be. Writing is a pompous, egotistical endeavor, and I should try not to be so self-absorbed and pretentious; so, writing has to go. Everything I write is some rip-off of David Foster Wallace or J. D. Salinger anyway, so it’s not like I’m even original in any way. And when I die, about three people will have read any of my stuff anyway, so it’ll be like I had never written to begin with, so what’s the point? It’s time to grow up and focus on the important things in life, the stuff that makes me feel good, like watching YouTube Shorts and playing video games.

Spend More Time on My Phone
This year, I aspire to look at my phone way more than ever before. Behind that tempered glass is a wonderland of entertainment and good feels. I will download all the apps, spend hours lying on my bed swiping through YouTube Shorts, and sign up for more social media than ever before so that I can make funny and/or smart posts in hopes that people give me lots of upvotes and retweets because this is a surefire way to get the validation I desperately seek. I will replace my in-person community with the Reddit app and get all my news from echo chambers so that all my smart opinions are constantly validated. This will make me very happy.

Eat Shitloads of Candy
This one’s self-explanatory, but this year I will endeavor to never be without candy. If I run out of candy, I will immediately drive to the nearest gas station or grocery store and buy more. I will dedicate a kitchen cabinet solely to candy. It will be called the Candy Cabinet. I will not share the candy. I will eat whole bags. I will try all sorts of new candies and savor each and every sugary explosion of taste. I will become a candy connoisseur who eats nothing but candy. And I will absolutely not go to the dentist.

Don’t Go Outside and Never Work Out
Going outside is a pain in the ass and working out is hard. These things require a lot of mental and physical effort, all for very little short-term payoff. And, in the cosmic scheme of things, these things don’t matter because nothing matters. Everyone dies, so what’s the point? This year, instead of going outside or working out, I will instead use that time to play video games or watch YouTube Shorts, because life is short so I might as well keep myself entertained at all times.

Drink Every Night and Consider Day Drinking

Historically, I have had problems with drinking; once I start, I cannot stop. But this year, I’m realizing that this is not my problem, it’s society’s problem. It's the people around me who are the problem. If the people around me were more accepting of my drinking, then it wouldn’t be such a big deal. So, this year, I am going to start drinking way more, and I'm going to tell those around me to lighten up and deal with it. “Stop fucking with my vibe.” I'm going to drink a bottle of wine each night and perhaps start day drinking as well, because it makes me more charismatic and sociable and fun, and most importantly it makes me feel really good. Again, life is short, so I might as well spend as much time as possible making myself feel good. I could die tomorrow, after all, so why deprive myself of the things I so enjoy?

And that’s it. Those are my New Year’s resolutions. These are the promises I am making to myself, promises that I sincerely hold and will try my best to fulfill. I am really looking forward to achieving all my goals this year. It would be a terrible shame if I ended up doing the opposite of any of these things.

Happy New Year.

f0rrest: (Default)
Despite my overall gloomy disposition, I love the Christmas season, seriously. It’s my favorite holiday. There’s just something about it, something in the air maybe. I love how everything feels different, how the general mood and atmosphere change, how you can put a literal tree in your home without anyone batting an eye, how that tree changes the whole vibe of the house, how the smell of evergreen is redolent of innocence and cheer, and I love how I can wear baggy sweaters and beanies without anyone looking at me weird, and how neighborhoods light up so bright that they can probably be seen from orbit, and how everyone seems to be in an overall better mood maybe because they’re all getting time off work, and how neighborhood kids you’ve never seen before are suddenly out in the roads playing with all their new bikes and scooters and Power Wheels, and all the little rituals like the advent calendars and the candles and the Elf on the Shelf and the putting-cookies-out-for-Santa thing and, of course, the presents.

Who doesn’t love the presents? I mean, that’s what Christmas is all about, right?

We have to get everyone we know a present. I mean, everyone is getting everyone else a present, so you better get them a present too, right? Grandma and grandpa sent you some socks, so you better get them something in return. Your brother sent you a $100 Target gift card, so you need to get him something as well. Great aunts and uncles you’ve never seen before in your life sent you some presents, so of course you should get them a present too, right? And you can’t forget about mom and dad, they’ve been buying you presents since before you were old enough to remember, so you better buy them some presents too, if only to balance the karmic scale of presents. And surely you don’t want your friends and family thinking you’re some sort of Grinch, right? Some sort of ruiner of Christmas. You must spread the Christmas cheer. And if you have kids, you better get them a shitload of presents too, because all their friends are getting presents and you don’t want your kids feeling unloved, do you? You don’t want to ruin their Christmas, right? You don’t want your kids to hate you, do you? This is why it is imperative that you drop everything you’re doing and go to the local Walmart and buy up all the cheap plastic you can possibly fit into your cart, regardless of whatever financial situation you’re in. Every Christmas tree in every home must be littered with presents, this is the American way.

So yeah, I love Christmas, but Christmas also kind of sucks, and it sucks because, frankly, the presents. On the one hand, like most people, I like getting presents. But on the other hand, I dislike the sense of expectation and obligation that comes along with gifting presents. Furthermore, on a philosophical level, I dislike the unapologetic celebration of materialism that comes along with Christmas, as it feels very weird and gross. And because I participate in all this quote-unquote “Christmas cheer,” I myself start to feel a little weird and gross too, like a totally different person almost.

For example, I got my wife nine gifts for Christmas, but she only got me three. This upsets me for some reason.

Every year, I tell my wife not to get me anything for Christmas, and she tells me the same, yet we always end up getting each other stuff anyway. I am now realizing this is an unhealthy dynamic. It sets up a weird, dishonest, self-defeating expectation. We go into Christmas Day expecting something yet vocalizing the opposite, and when we wake up Christmas morning and see nothing under the tree with our names on it, we are left feeling both disappointed and a little bit guilty. Disappointed because, like, if you love me so much, why didn’t you bother to get me anything? And guilty because, if I love you so much, why didn’t I bother to get you anything? This becomes extra complicated when Person A gets Person B a gift but Person B didn’t get Person A a gift, or when Person A got Person B nine gifts when Person B only got Person A three gifts, which turns the whole thing into a weird numbers game that only intensifies the guilt and disappointment. And yes, I realize this is very obviously a self-inflicted problem, but I can’t help but think that this problem wouldn’t exist at all if Christmas were not such a bullshit holiday.

My wife is very familiar with my thoughts on Christmas. I think it’s a bullshit, consumerist holiday. I don't want to give gifts, and in many cases I don't, but I have been primed from a young age to both give and receive gifts. This nexus of giving and receiving has produced a sense of expectation and obligation within me, an expectation to receive gifts from loved ones and an obligation to give gifts in return because otherwise I feel guilty, because to receive a gift from someone while not giving them anything in return feels a little uncaring and gross. In normal circumstances, i.e. not Christmas, this problem rarely comes up, I buy someone a gift simply because I want to, out of the kindness of my heart or whatever, but Christmas is different, Christmas forces my hand, makes me feel bad if I don’t participate, so I end up buying gifts for people simply because I don’t want to feel guilty later on, a sort of proactive guilt-avoidance behavior, which sort of undermines the whole “Spirit of Christmas” thing to begin with, the whole spirit of goodwill and giving, because to give a gift inspired by guilt feels a little gross compared to giving a gift simply out of kindness. 

Supposedly, Christmas wasn’t always like this, it wasn’t always about gifts, it was about togetherness and generosity and joy and Jesus or something. I say “supposedly” because I seriously wouldn’t know, as Ultra Materialist Christmas is all I’ve ever known. Whatever Christmas might have been in the past is irrelevant now, as it’s now a corporate holiday that materially benefits corporate execs while spiritually eroding everyone else’s soul. Executives at Hasbro and Sony love Christmas. They do targeted holiday product releases and play ads that are like “show them how much you care this holiday season” and “make this year unforgettable” and “give the gift of cheer, only $199.99” and they do this with great big smiles on their faces. They foster a sense of FOMO and guilt and then they turn these complex emotions into cold hard cash. And we have fallen hook line and sinker for their corporate games, as we now conflate holiday cheer with cheap plastic, electronics, and kitchen appliances, believing these things necessary ingredients of Christmas Spirit. 

In some ways, Christmas is a mirror of the general western attitude toward life. We conflate material things with success and happiness. The more stuff we have, the more presents under the tree, the more gift cards and cash, the happier we think we’ll be. We forgo all the basic ingredients of human happiness, like community and kindness and family and compassion and love and friendship and all that sappy shit, for cheap plastic made in China and a new pair of Beats Headphones, and this makes us momentarily happy but we still end up miserable long-term. This is America. This is Christmas. It sucks.

This holiday season, I’ve been watching a lot of Christmas movies. My wife loves them. She plays them every year. They’re always on in the background, like white noise in the house. They add to that special Christmas ambiance. My son enjoys them too. He particularly likes How the Grinch Stole Christmas and the Paw Patrol Christmas Movie, or whatever it’s called. And since these movies are always on, I’ve seen them quite a few times, so I’ve had a lot of time to analyze them, and I've noticed that these movies always try to convey some sort of heartwarming, Christmas-spirit-like message yet ultimately end up just reinforcing Ultra Materialist Christmas, and they do this in a subtle, almost contradictory way. For example, in both of the aforementioned movies, some villain steals all the gifts, which becomes like an existential Christmas crisis for the kindhearted people of Whoville or whatever, but by the end of the movie, they get all the presents back, and thus Christmas is saved. In the Paw Patrol movie, for example, at first the pups of the Paw Patrol resign themselves to the fact that the presents are gone and cope with it by telling themselves something like “we don’t need presents to enjoy Christmas,” but of course the kids in town want their presents or whatever, so the Paw Patrol come up with a way to get all the presents back, and so by the end of the movie everyone has presents and Christmas is saved. But this is very weird to me, because it seems like the movie knows that Christmas is an Ultra Materialist holiday and that this is bad on some level, hence the pro we-don’t-need-presents sentiment, but then the movie immediately turns around and reinforces the same Ultra Materialist message it just criticized, by giving everyone the presents back. It seems like the writers knew in their heart of hearts that this obsession with presents is harmful in some way, but they can’t actually commit to this anti-materialism stance. They can't have the Grinch or whoever break the samsaric cycle of materialism for whatever reason.

So, my question is, when the Grinch steals all the presents, why can't we just thank him for the favor?
f0rrest: (kid pix w/ headphones)
Back in 2016, when I was 25 years old, I was living in one of those single-wide mobile homes perilously held up by stacked cement blocks, one of those ones with the cheap vinyl skirts they wrap around the bottom to hide all the duct-taped plumbing and rotted-out wood and raccoon colonies and maybe a dead body or two, because who knows what was actually going on under there. I may have flirted with the dark abyss, but I sure as hell did not want to crawl into it to find out what was inside. My life philosophy at the time a laissez-faire mixture of red wine and nicotine clouds and pixels, so I didn’t even care about much of anything, to tell you the truth. In fact, the rent was so cheap at $650 a month that when the landlord originally showed me the property, I immediately said “Where do I sign?” and moved my wife and three-year-old daughter into the place without even so much as a basic cursory inspection, driven mostly by the fact that I was destitute both philosophically and financially, answering phones for a coffee company for like $14 an hour and binge drinking every night. I just wanted a stable roof over my family’s head, a place that wasn't in an apartment complex, a place with a yard, with some level of privacy, a place where I could play video games, drink wine, and blast super loud music while chain-smoking cigarettes outside without someone filing a noise complaint, and this super cheap rundown trailer from the 80s checked all those hedonistic boxes. 

But as it turns out, skipping the cursory inspection was a big mistake, because, as I would come to find out years later, the place was a deathtrap, and I learned this the hard way, or, well, my daughter did, when the roof in her bedroom collapsed.

It’s hard to believe that almost a decade has passed since I first moved into that shithole, because I remember it as if it were yesterday. My daily routine started in medias res, do something with my daughter after work, pour my first glass of wine around 8 p.m., finish my seventh by 2 a.m., pop a few Benadryl to fall asleep, drive to the call center six hours later, repeat. I would drink so much the night before that I was pretty much still wasted the morning after. My skin was always clammy and pale and my eyes were raccoon eyes. They say men between the age of 20 to 30 are in their prime, able to muster almost supernatural levels of strength, persevere through any hardship by sheer force of will, but I spent whatever supernatural strength I had just getting out of bed in the morning with the worst hangovers known to man and then somehow driving five miles through busy morning traffic all without getting into a single car accident despite the fact that I was nodding off behind the wheel the whole time. Half the time, I wouldn’t even remember driving to work, I’d just appear at my desk in the call center, as if I had somehow teleported there, taking calls in this autopilot-like daze. “Thank you for calling Keurig, my name is Forrest. May I have your first and last name, please? Thank you. And your email address? And your coffee maker’s serial number? Thank you again. And you say your coffee maker is short-cupping? I understand. I know that must be frustrating. We’ll have to do some troubleshooting, so please be aware that the needles inside the machine are very sharp, but could you please gather a paperclip and small measuring cup, then we can get started.”

And this worked for me somehow. I reached a certain level of homeostasis. I made around $1,800 a month, $650 of that went to rent, $300 went to utilities, food was paid for by SNAP, a couple hundred went to things for my daughter, and whatever money left over went to Marlboro Lights and Liberty Creek Cabernet Sauvignon, which was the cheapest supermarket swill wine money could buy at the time, at like $8 per 2-liter bottle, which, at 30 proof, was also the most bang for your buck in terms of getting absolutely shitfaced as quickly as possible, outside of just drinking straight liquor, which I never had the stomach for. Back then, when I was 25, I was still a child, singularly focused on myself, and whatever seemingly grown-up big-boy shit I did do was only done to maintain my comfortable homeostasis. I knew I had a drinking problem, but the negative consequences were not severe enough for me to take it seriously, especially since the euphoria after a few glasses of wine was so strong that it felt like I could not live without the stuff, like life would be just a boring slog without my Cabernet. And there was an identity aspect to it as well, because I thought drinking was super cool, and I even thought that having a drinking problem was kind of cool too, like it added character in some way, a sort of tortured-soul aesthetic. When I drank red wine, I felt like some sort of vampire sophisticate. I loved the whole ritual, the orbed glass, the twist of the wine key, the pop of the cork, the glug-glug of the pour, the exotic aroma, all of it. I would hold that first sip in my mouth for like a whole minute, just swishing it around in there like a mouthful of blood. And after a few sips, I would go outside and sit on the small uncovered wooden steps that functioned as my porch, to smoke cigarettes and listen to super loud music, bringing my orbed glass along with me, because music just hits different and cigarettes just taste better when you’re wasted, and that’s a fact.

After my daughter went to bed, I would sit myself down at my computer desk with a glass of red and boot up a video game. I would play Final Fantasy XI or The Elder Scrolls Online or some other life-suck type game, just getting totally fucked up and lost in those virtual worlds. Eventually, I started joining a Discord server with my old friends from high school, which only made my drinking worse, as we’d all drink and get fucked up together. A sort of digital drinking culture evolved, to the point that, for a few years there, we would be in that Discord server every night, drinking to the point of blurred vision and slurred speech, playing our preferred game of the week, be it Monster Hunter World, Tekken 7, Risk of Rain, Counter-Strike: Source, Diablo III,  King of Fighters XIII, or whatever, just yelling and laughing and trolling the shit out of each other, sometimes to the point of bitter rivalries, weeks-long feuds, all settled with our preferred choice of alcoholic beverage and controller. There was a real sense of community there, built on old friendships and video games and, most importantly, alcohol, because it was weird when someone wasn’t drinking while everyone else was, like you couldn’t connect on the same existential plane or something if you weren’t basically blackout drunk. It was the same sort of peer pressure you might experience in high school, just carried over unspoken into adulthood.

Between rounds of whatever we were playing at the time, I would step outside and smoke a cigarette or two, making sure to bring my wine glass along with me, because after I got my first taste of blood, I could not stop. The moment I could no longer taste the aftertaste of that bittersweet earthy red, something like anxious dread would creep in, a persistent fear that the night would end, that the euphoria would fade, unless I kept drinking, so I would drink and drink and drink, a crimson tide flowing down my esophagus every minute of the night, even when I was outside smoking. And to make my outside-smoking excursions more entertaining, I would play music from my phone’s speakers, and I would literally dance and sway out there in my front yard, sometimes singing at the top of my lungs. 

This is the night of the expanding man
I take one last drag as I approach the stand
I cried when I wrote this song
Sue me if I play too long
This brother is free
I'll be what I want to be


Back then, my favorite band was Steely Dan. It all started when I heard the song “Peg” on the radio one day. I had heard the song before but never really paid much attention to it until one day, when the stars aligned, when it came on the classic rock station and I happened to be in just the right mood. The song resonated with me. The downtown strut of the electric piano, the intricate bounce of the bassline, the bitter darkness hidden within the joyful melody, that rich baritone background vocal by Michael McDonald, all the crazy guitar shit going on that you don’t even notice without specifically listening for it. It’s just a fantastic song, one of the greatest pop tunes ever written. It got me obsessed with Steely Dan, head over heels for their whole dark-irony-hidden-behind-layers-of-smooth-jazz sound. They had that whole anti-hipster thing going on too, which aligned well with my own anti-hip contrarian attitude. Of course, being an anti-hipster is actually just another flavor of being a hipster, perhaps the worst kind, but that didn’t stop me from going through Steely Dan’s entire discography, repeat listening to each album, falling in love with songs like “Only a Fool Would Say That,” “Bodhisattva,” “Rose Darling,” “Kid Charlemagne,” “Gaucho,” and “Your Gold Teeth II,” which, if you’ve been rolling your eyes at the Steely Dan stuff thus far, is probably the song you should listen to because it’s just straight-up poetic and beautiful, one of their few uplifting songs, musically transcendent almost, so much so that if you don’t like it, then there’s a good chance you just don’t like music, period. But back then, “Your Gold Teeth II” wasn’t my favorite song by them. My favorite song was actually “Deacon Blues,” a song that sounds like the inside of a smoky underworld dive bar, a place where the tragically hip and the perpetually misunderstood come together to drink their lives away.

Learn to work the saxophone
I play just what I feel
Drink Scotch whiskey all night long
And die behind the wheel


Back then, Steely Dan was my band, and “Deacon Blues” was my song. I identified with that song. I wanted to live inside that song. I saw myself as the protagonist of that song, the tragic hero, the misunderstood artist, playing exactly what he feels, drinking all night long, maybe one day dying behind the wheel, because who cares, nothing really matters, the universe is all chaos and jazz, no one even asked to be here, we’re all just specks of stardust, a flash in the cosmic scheme of things.

So call me Deacon Blues.

And alcohol was my one true love, my muse. It got to the point where, if alcohol wasn’t in my bloodstream, I wasn’t really there, in the present. During the daylight hours, when I wouldn’t drink, I would spend time with my daughter, take her to the playground, the indoor kids’ places, even play dolls on the floor of her small 10x10 trailer park bedroom, but I was never really there. I mean, my physical body was there, but my soul was not. It was someplace else entirely. I was pretending. I went through the motions because I felt like I had to, out of some persistent feeling of guilt, but my heart was never really in it. Every moment I spent with her, I was counting down the seconds until my first glass of wine. The daylight hours were just an excruciatingly long prelude to getting wasted, hammered, shitfaced, sloshed, just absolutely ossified. These were my priorities. I was a child pretending to be a father, a shell of a parent. I would constantly tell my daughter that I loved her as a way to sort of compensate for my parental absenteeism, as if cheap words could ever make up for shit parenting. But whenever she would have trouble falling asleep, making me late to my first glass of wine, I would suddenly become a harsh disciplinarian, not because I thought it was an effective way to discipline a child, but because I would become frustrated and short-tempered without wine, sometimes shouting orders at the girl like I was an army drill instructor or something. “THAT WAS THE LAST STORY. GET IN BED. PUT YOUR DAMN TOYS AWAY. CLOSE YOUR EYES. IT’S BEDTIME. DON’T MAKE ME TELL YOU AGAIN.” And this was usually followed by some pathetic apology and cheap I-love-you.

When my wife would confront me about the shouting, I would justify my outbursts by espousing some rigid parenting philosophy that I didn’t actually believe in. “Kids need discipline. There’s a certain level of fear that must be maintained. This is the way of the world, just look at countries, states, governments, they all maintain order through fear. This is just reality. Laws exist for a reason. My shouting functions as a deterrent to bad behavior, in the same way that the threat of jail functions as a deterrent to crime. What do you really think the world would be like without laws? Do you really think it would be a better place? Honestly? Don’t be naive.” And then I would pour the first of many glasses of wine and disappear into my office, feeling guilty for a whole ten seconds before my blood alcohol levels spiked, at which point I would ride the crimson tide, waves of drunken euphoria, without a care in the world. And this is how it went, night after night.

And it was on one of these nights that the roof caved in.

It had been raining all throughout the week, so it was a damp Friday night. I read my daughter a short story, cleaned up her Legos and Bratz dolls and stuffed animals, tucked her into her cheap Minnie Mouse toddler bed, kissed her on the head, told her that I loved her, apologized for shouting, turned off the lights, shut the bedroom door behind me, poured my first glass of red, logged into the Discord server, and started my whole hedonistic routine. I drank and smoked and listened to Steely Dan for hours and hours. And by the time I got ready for bed, which was around three in the morning, I had drunk so much that my head felt like it was being repeatedly hit with a hammer underwater, and my stomach was one of those bubbling lava pits you see in video games. I had lost control, failed to pace myself, as I often did. I was hunched over the toilet at three in the morning, vomiting up a crimson tide. The inside of the bowl looked like the scene of some grisly murder. After about an hour of throwing up, through sheer force of will, I picked myself up, stumbled to bed, and fell face first on the mattress, passing out.

When I woke up, my head was pounding something fierce, my chest was burning, and it was still dark outside. My wife was shouting something from the foot of the bed. I didn't want to get up, but it seemed serious, so I used some of that supernatural strength young men supposedly have and rolled myself out of bed. My wife was gesticulating, frantically explaining something that I could not comprehend in the moment, and then she grabbed my wrist and pulled me into the living room. It was dark, and our daughter was sitting there on the couch, hands in her dark hair, sobbing. My wits were slowly coming back, so I walked up to my daughter, put a hand on her shoulder, and tried to comfort her, but she wouldn’t calm down. Then my wife said something like, “It’s her bedroom. The roof. The roof fell through. She was in there for hours.” And I could not believe it. So I rushed to my daughter’s bedroom to see for myself.

It was dark in there, and there was a draft, and there was a heaviness in the air. I started coughing, covering my mouth. Then I turned the light on, saw the pile of rotted wood right by the Minnie Mouse bed, the bed itself covered in a thick layer of gray and brown. There were clouds of dust hovering throughout the room, obscuring the Disney pinups and galaxies of glow-in-the-dark ceiling stars. I looked up, and that’s when I saw it, a huge gaping hole, pieces of ceiling and wood jutting out all around the wound, just dangling there, still in the process of collapse. My wife said something from behind me. “I told you this place was a deathtrap.” So I turned to my wife, asked her when this happened, and she said it must have happened hours ago, according to our daughter, so it must have happened when I was awake in the office. She said our daughter was paralyzed with fear, that she couldn't move, that she had just stayed there in bed, under the covers, for who knows how long, frozen with fear, calling out for help. My wife asked if I had heard anything, if I had heard the crash, if I had heard our daughter calling out. I told her that I hadn't heard a thing. She glared at me with something like disgust in her eyes.

I remember just standing in that broken room, thinking it was a symbol of some kind, of neglect, of carelessness, of dysfunction. I had no words. My eyes were like super moons, and my body had taken on some sort of heinous gravity. I imagined our daughter, under the covers, eyes closed tight, her little body trembling, fearing for her life, believing some monster had crawled out of the ceiling and was about to eat her. I imagined her calling out for mommy, for daddy, for God, for anyone, to come help, how her cries went unanswered solely because I was too drunk to hear them.

My wife said something like, “This place is unlivable. I’m going to file a lawsuit.” And then she pulled out her phone and started fiddling with it. “We’re going to need pictures. Let me take a picture.”

But I stopped her, told her to let me do it, so she gave me her phone. I walked further into the room to get a better look at the hole, but I was too afraid to go directly underneath it, so instead I booted up the phone’s camera app, turned the flash on, stretched my phone-arm, positioning the phone under the hole, and snapped a picture. And that’s when I saw it.

Photograph #1 )

Apparently, there was a hole in the top roof, and a family of raccoons had been living up there in the attic-like space between the ceiling and the roof itself. The hole must have been pretty old, judging by the water damage and amount of mold shown in the picture. So I figured that, due to the accumulated rain water and who-knows-how-many raccoons, the ceiling just couldn’t hold anymore, finally collapsing under the weight of it all. And I figured that the raccoon in the picture must have been the matriarch of the family, who must have gotten out of there before the ceiling fell through. But, eyes wide and mouth agape at possibly the craziest picture I had ever taken in my life, I wondered why the mother raccoon was looking down into the room, like what could she have possibly been looking for?

That’s when my parenting instincts kicked in. The mother raccoon must have been looking for one of her babies, one of her little kits, who must have fallen through the ceiling. So I scoured the bedroom, looking for raccoons. And it only took me about five minutes to find one, a little baby raccoon, hidden underneath a pile of toys in the corner of the room, curled up in a little pink bowl.

Photograph #2 )

The kit’s eyes were closed tight, and she was shivering a little bit. There was a pinkish bulge on one of her legs, like an injury of some sort, maybe from the fall. I knew she couldn't have landed in the bowl itself, as the bowl was on the other side of the room, so I figured that she must have crawled across the room after falling through the ceiling, and when she found a place to hide, she just curled up there and waited for mommy and daddy to come rescue her. But mommy and daddy never came, just me. And, luckily for that little kit, I love raccoons. But when I was holding that pink bowl in my hand, looking down at that injured baby raccoon, seeing it all helpless and afraid, I didn’t really see a raccoon at all, I saw my daughter.

My wife wouldn’t let us keep the baby raccoon, even though I wanted to. So, later that day, I put the kit in a box stuffed with towels and put the box outside, at the treeline of the woods near my trailer, hoping that mom would return, take her baby back home, wherever home was for them. But hours passed, and mom never showed up, so I got worried about the little kit, worried that she might starve, that she might succumb to her injuries, so my daughter and I took the baby raccoon to the local animal hospital, but they told us that they couldn’t take wild animals, that they didn’t have the proper permits or something. So we left that animal hospital dejected and confused, having no idea what to do with the little kit. I remember just sitting there in my car, head still pounding from the night before, coming up totally blank on what to do next.

But after about five minutes, a young woman walked up to my car and signaled me to roll down the window. “We’ll take the raccoon, but you’ll need to sneak it into the back. Drive around.”

So I turned the key, revved the engine, and started driving around to the backside of the animal hospital. The car’s stereo connected to my phone automatically via Bluetooth, playing the last song I was listening to the night before, which just happened to be “Deacon Blues.” And when I got to the backside of the animal shelter, I left the car running in park, told my daughter to wait, and carried the box with the baby raccoon in it to the back door, where the same young woman from before smiled at me, took the box from my hands, and said, “Don’t worry, she’ll be fine, we’ll take care of her.” And I was left feeling a little sad, because for some reason I knew that I would never see that baby raccoon again.

“Deacon Blues” was still playing when I got back into the car. It was on the chorus, so before I buckled my seatbelt and put the car in reverse, I paused to savor that dark, jazzy sound.

They got a name for the winners in the world
I want a name when I lose
They call Alabama the Crimson Tide
Call me Deacon Blues


But this was not the song I knew. It was different. It was an entirely new song, with an entirely new meaning. I started thinking to myself, the protagonist of this song, he’s not some tortured-soul romantic, some hip idealist, some sort of tragic hero rebelling against the tides of a dark, unfair world. He’s not any of those things.

He’s just some fucking alcoholic loser.

So call me Deacon Blues.
f0rrest: (Default)
It feels like every member of my family believes in some kind of wild, crazy shit: my sister believes crystals have healing powers, my brother believes psychedelics can unlock some latent third eye in the mind, I believe that maybe possibly reincarnation might be real, my grandma believes extraterrestrials are walking among us, and my mom believes in trickle-down economics.

All these things seem ridiculous to me. But wouldn't it be a little arrogant to just dismiss them outright? Like, who am I to pretend to know which things are true or false, right or wrong, plausible or implausible, and so on? After all, I'm only human. I don't know everything. I'm not some bastion of knowledge. I just kind of go with my first impression, based on the information available to me and, admittedly, my preexisting biases. I'm not going to sit here and pretend that I've solved problems of epistemology that philosophers have been debating for centuries. I’m not that full of myself. So I'm willing to admit that maybe, just maybe, my eccentric family members have tapped into some esoteric knowledge that I have just not tapped into myself. Who knows? The universe is vast. Anything is possible.

Yet, for some reason, I can’t help but think that some of my family members’ wild claims are just flat-out wrong, that perhaps their own limited knowledge and preexisting biases are leading them astray, leading them to believe some crazy, unverifiable shit.

Take, for example, my sister, who believes that certain types of crystals can treat certain types of illnesses, corresponding to the astrologically adjacent color of the crystal. My sister has been dealing with hypothyroidism and various muscle pains for her entire life. And she refuses to go to a doctor, thinks they're all money-grubbing shysters, so she's been treating her ailments with what she calls crystal therapy for years now: wearing necklaces adorned with crystals, meditatively squeezing crystals, sometimes sprinkling crystal dust on her food, that sort of thing. Yet she's not getting any better. Actually, the opposite, she's getting worse. One would think that if the crystals aren't alleviating her suffering then she'd stop believing in the so-called “healing powers” of these crystals, but no, she continues to believe, persisting with this ridiculous crystal therapy. I imagine her thought process is something like, “Well, I'd be much worse off if I didn't use the crystals at all,” or something like that, which, to me, is some self-serving circular logic, some post hoc justification, like she's unwilling to face the fact that she's been wrong about the crystals her whole adult life and is now simply doubling down on the bullshit, like some sort of psychic self-defense mechanism that keeps her from feeling like an idiot or something.

And my mom, as another example, with her trickle-down economics, this idea that cutting taxes for the wealthy will somehow result in financial prosperity for the little guy, which seems to fly in the face of everything we know about basic human behavior, which is mostly driven by greed, an inclination to accumulate and hoard wealth for self-serving purposes. I mean, Reagan and Bush tried this, they tried cutting taxes for the wealthy, and various post hoc analyses showed that this produced no significant increase in overall economic growth or job creation, instead just widening the gap between haves and have-nots, because the wealthy simply pocketed the extra cash, buying themselves more yachts and mansions or whatever. Trump also tried this with the 2017 U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which dropped corporate tax rates by about 10%, and we’re not really seeing any of that trickle down. Instead, we’re seeing CEOs spend those savings on dividends and stock buybacks, while our national debt increases exponentially and job growth remains pretty much stagnant. This stuff is all publicly available information, yet you’lll never hear about it on Fox News, which is where my mom gets most of her information, so she continues to persist in her fantastical beliefs.

But I didn't really want to talk about crystals or economics here. What I actually want to talk about here is big-headed gray aliens, which might just be the only claim here that’s even remotely plausible, surprisingly.

My grandma has always been a staunch believer in extraterrestrial life, not only that life exists on other planets, which seems reasonable to me, but that aliens have traveled to Earth and, in some cases, have infiltrated world governments, which does not seem so reasonable to me. In 1947, when that unidentified flying object crash-landed in Roswell, New Mexico, dominating the news cycle for months, Grandma Susu was an impressionable teenager, and this event left an impact crater on her brain about the size of the one left in the desert by that mysterious UFO. The government’s response certainly didn’t help dissuade her from believing it was aliens, if anything it reinforced it, because at first the government acknowledged it was a UFO crash, but the very next day they retracted this claim, instead saying it was a weather balloon. And the reports of strange aluminum-like material found at the crash certainly didn’t help dissuade her either. This material, when crushed, would instantly return to its pre-crushed state, supposedly, which, to Grandma Susu, meant that of course it had to be of extraterrestrial origin because anything not immediately understandable must be aliens. Forget “God of the Gaps,” we’re in “Aliens of the Gaps” territory now. And of course, the government has no reason to lie about this incident unless it was truly aliens. Surely there was no top-secret aircraft that the government might have been hiding in order to protect their secret from enemies of the state, and surely this would not have resulted in some sort of mass disinformation campaign in which the government might first claim that the crashed top-secret aircraft was actually an alien spacecraft but then turn around to claim that it was actually a weather balloon, just to confuse people into not knowing what to believe or whatever, thereby tricking people into camps of alien-believers and non-alien-believers, and in this way, whether someone believes it’s a weather balloon or an alien ship, it doesn't really matter either way, because both camps are now serving government interests, because if people believe the bullshit then they won’t be poking into potentially sketchy government secrets, but of course neither the UFO community nor the National Association of Weather Balloon Enthusiasts care about this dynamic, both just choosing to believe whatever narrative reinforces their preexisting biases.

I’ve found that the truth is often hidden in places people least want you to look. So it seems more likely to me that whatever crash-landed in Roswell was some sort of experimental aircraft that the government was trying to keep hidden, evidenced by the massive disinformation campaign around the whole thing, which only served to distract people from what was really going on. But of course Susu doesn’t see it that way. She wholeheartedly believes that whatever crash-landed in that desert was actually of extraterrestrial origin, and she hasn’t stopped talking about this since 1947.

When I was a kid, I would spend the summers with Susu, and back then her media diet consisted almost entirely of ufology, and this rubbed off on me in a big way. I absorbed alien mythology like some sort of intense background radiation, which both frightened and intrigued me. When she was playing solitaire in her room, she’d have the SyFy channel on, watching some documentary about aliens. I remember one time she was particularly excited about a new Roswell documentary, one which showed so-called “new unearthed footage” of the autopsy done on the quote-unquote “alien bodies” supposedly recovered from the Roswell crash site. This footage was reportedly taken in 1947, right after the crash, yet, as independent researchers pointed out, none of the film equipment used in the footage could have existed in 1947, and there were a number of other little oddities, all of which eventually forced the filmmaker, Ray Santilli, to admit that the whole thing was actually a staged recreation of some footage he saw that he swears on his mama’s life was actually real, genuine autopsy footage that, as of the creation of the recreation, was so deteriorated that it can no longer be watched, hence the recreation, which he only admitted after being called out, go figure. And of course, the aliens in the footage resembled the classic Gray alien variants found in all sorts of science fiction media, which gets another go figure from me. And of course, the SyFy documentary did not cover any of this recreation stuff at the time, instead presenting the autopsy footage as bona fide proof that aliens crash-landed in Roswell, which just served to validate and solidify Susu’s preexisting belief that aliens did indeed crash-land in that desert on July 7th, 1947, which also served to scare the shit out of me as a 10-year-old child with an overactive imagination who was easily spooked by the unknown.

I remember being so scared of aliens that, whenever I was outside and it was dark, I would always feel that primal pressure, that atavistic self-defense mechanism, on the back of my neck, my brain always telling me that something was behind me, stalking me, as if some sort of big-headed Gray was going to snatch me up and take me to the mothership for forced mating and probing or whatever. I was so scared of aliens that, sometimes, at night, when I had to come home from a friend’s house, instead of simply walking home, which would have taken like two minutes in most cases, I would instead call Susu and have her pick me up in her car, and those car trips only served to scare me further because Susu would always be listening to some paranormal radio program on the AM band, and they’d always be talking about fucking alien abductions and shit, which would just further freak me the hell out. But I never told Susu any of this because, despite aliens scaring me, there was something exciting about the whole thing, something gripping. The tinge of fear coupled with the unknown, like something more was out there in the vastness of space, was enthralling to me, and honestly, I couldn’t get enough of it. I would watch the UFO documentaries and listen to the AM broadcasts just as closely as Susu would, absorbing it all, totally entranced, even though it scared the living hell out of me and made it so I couldn’t sleep in my own bed at night, seeing aliens behind the darks of my eyelids.

And Susu wouldn’t just listen to paranormal radio on car trips, she would also listen to it while sewing in her garage, at full blast, with the door open, meaning aliens and ghosts surfed the invisible waves within the airspace of her small home at all hours of the day. I could not escape the alien invasion, nor did I want to, because learning about aliens was like uncovering some deeply esoteric knowledge that only a privileged few could know. I remember one radio show in particular, called Coast to Coast AM, hosted by Art Bell and sometimes George Knapp, was Susu’s favorite. She would never miss a broadcast. Based out of Nevada, land of the aliens, these guys lived and breathed extraterrestrials. And they had an “Open Lines” portion of the show in which people would call in and tell their own alien stories, most of which involved abductions, lost time, UFO sightings, crop circles, all the standard alien shit. And, I remember, when George Knapp was hosting, he would introduce each broadcast with this poetic paranormal ramble, and this ramble stuck with me, intensified my youthful romanticization of the search for the unknown.

“Good evening, everyone. You're in the right place at the right time. This is Coast to Coast AM. Tonight, we're coming at you, blasting out of the Mojave Desert like a scirocco, blazing across the land into your town, into your home, slamming into your radio like a supercharged nanoparticle of dark energy. You've arrived at a nexus point, a crossroads of shadow and light, a phantasmagorical marketplace of ideas and blasphemies, where together we prowl through the wilderness of smoke and mirrors in the collective psyche. We are Coast to Coast AM, a grand melting pot of cultures and subcultures, from the benign to the bizarre, all on the same path, searching for breadcrumbs of cosmic understanding, hoping we'll be able to follow the trail back to where we started.”

Of course, back then, I didn't understand what half of those words meant, but it sounded cool as hell, so I was hardcore into it. Susu and I would dim the lights, gather around the radio, her operating the sewing machine, me operating the Game Boy Color, and we would listen to those crazy callers tell crazy stories about shadow people in the sewers of Las Vegas, technicolor lights in the Phoenix night sky, time travelers traveling back in time to collect old IBM parts to save their future timeline from some robot takeover, secret government mind-control projects using LSD and remote viewing, people claiming they’re the reincarnation of some old war hero or something, and, of course, alien abductions which often involved probes inserted into places they should never be inserted into. And, after those late-night broadcasts, I would fall asleep curled up in Susu’s bed, equal parts frightened and fascinated.

Recently, feeling like I had become too close-minded and rigid in my worldview, I thought it would do me well to revisit some of those old Coast to Coast AM broadcasts, relive some of that frightening adolescent fascination, get in touch with my inner child, a version of me that was less cynical, less arrogant, more open to otherworldly wonder. I was in serious need of phantasmagorical ideas and blasphemies being blasted right into my brain like supercharged nanoparticles of dark energy. And so I went searching for the Coast to Coast AM archives, and, lo and behold, I found it online, a huge repository of the old broadcasts, and I’ve been listening to them for the past few months, entrenching myself in paranormal mythos and hardcore extraterrestrial lore, dissolving myself into the grand melting pot of bizarre cultures and subcultures, inhaling the smoke that swirls before the mirrors of the mind, all in search for breadcrumbs of cosmic understanding.

But I haven’t found any breadcrumbs yet. I’ve only found rumor-fueled speculation, already debunked pseudoscience, supposedly top-secret information relayed by quote-unquote “Ex-Area-51 employees” who won’t use their real names or produce their credentials due to “personal safety reasons,” fervently told accounts of UFO sightings that are most likely just misidentified swamp gas or ball lightning or literally the planet Venus, stories that amount to nothing more than fiction because there were literally no witnesses other than this one guy who’s basically saying “just trust me bro,” and a number of other tales that, while entertaining as hell, are totally unverifiable and quite possibly made up by unhinged people starving for attention, their fifteen minutes of fame, made possible by Coast to Coast AM.

I imagine the average Coast to Coast AM caller’s everyday life is so mundane that they involuntarily come up with fantastical stories, see things that aren’t there, slot their sensory experiences into some paranormal narrative that they already buy into, all to alleviate their own boredom.

But here I am, being cynical again. Maybe I'm just too old, or maybe I've been indoctrinated by the mainstream science narratives, or maybe I'm just too close-minded to believe in all this shit. I listen to all these far-fetched stories told with approximately zero backing evidence, and I find myself becoming slightly annoyed, like these Coast to Coast AM callers are searching for cosmic breadcrumbs in all the wrong places. They see something they don’t understand and immediately attribute it to the paranormal, like shadow people or aliens or fucking Bigfoot or whatever, and this line of thinking offends me on some level, like the natural world is already full of mysteries without having to make shit up. For example, many UFO sightings are explainable by ball lightning, a mysterious and barely understood phenomenon, yet these so-called “ufologists” are not interested in studying ball lightning, which is super cool and interesting. Instead, they come up with fantastical stories about discs in the sky and big-headed Gray aliens, thereby ignoring the wonders of the natural world.

Ufology is basically like a religion, a belief system with no tangible evidence behind it, yet ufologists like to pretend they’re legitimate scientists practicing the scientific method, though they don’t actually follow the scientific process. They see ball lightning, don’t understand it, and instead of developing a testable hypothesis, they immediately conclude it’s aliens and therefore don’t have to investigate any further. They work backward from a conclusion formed by science fiction media and preexisting biases. I think my point here is that the universe is already full of mysteries waiting to be solved, but by focusing on imaginary Gray aliens and fucking Bigfoot, they are doing themselves a disservice almost, depriving themselves of a deeper understanding of the world around them.

But I am sympathetic because I do actually believe that aliens exist. I really do. Like I said in the sixth paragraph up there, “big-headed gray aliens … might just be the only claim here that’s even remotely plausible.” That's because aliens make sense to me, and this is not a hot take by any means, it’s actually quite basic. Depending on the scientific spacetime model you subscribe to, the universe is either infinite or really really fucking big and expanding. Personally, I don’t think the universe is infinite, otherwise every inch of the night sky would be covered in starlight due to the infinite number of stars, meaning there would be no night at all, but I do believe that the universe is really really fucking big and expanding, and I think physicists have done some math or whatever to sort of verify that. Either way, infinite or not, both scenarios imply that there are lots of galaxies swirling around lots of supermassive black holes within which lots of planets are swirling around lots of stars, “lots” being a gross understatement here, to the point that it would be absurd if aliens did not exist on one of those planets out there. And, based on measuring cosmic background radiation, the universe is something like 13.8 billion years old, and the Earth itself is only 4.5 billion years old, meaning a lot of time has passed for life on other planets to pop up. In fact, I would argue that, based on our current understanding of the universe, aliens are pretty much a given, like 100%, they are out there, they have to be. There is another Earth-like planet out there in another galaxy that has life on it. I am wholly convinced of this. Now, whether or not aliens can get to our planet is another matter entirely, one that I'm skeptical of due to our current understanding of the seemingly hard-coded rules of light-speed travel, but nevertheless, I believe they are out there somewhere. Otherwise, young-Earth creationists are right, and our entire scientific model of the universe is just flat-out wrong, and that's not something I'm willing to accept right now based on the available evidence, because, frankly, I trust modern science over ancient desert scribbles. And aliens don’t even need to exist on Earth-like planets. They don’t even need to be carbon-based like us. There’s nothing stopping life from being silicon-based or nitrogen-based or phosphorus-based or whatever-based. It would be arrogant and naive to think that all life in the universe has to be like us. Life could even exist outside of the human-visible electromagnetic spectrum, like within weird space waves and shit, and we’d never even know it. The thing about science is that we’re literally always learning new things, so it would be insane to think that, right here, right now, we have cracked the code of the universe, as if there’s nothing left to discover.

So, again, I am sympathetic toward believers in the paranormal, because they have the right idea. The universe is vast, and there are many unknowns. They’re searching for cosmic breadcrumbs just like everyone else, they’re just doing it the wrong way. They’re kind of starting with a whole loaf of bread instead of breadcrumbs, beginning with a conclusion and working backward, as if they already have everything figured out and just need to prove it to other people for some reason, which is not how proper science or even logical deduction should work.

And this line of thinking also does a disservice to yourself, as it’s a close-minded worldview, because if you immediately jump to “it’s aliens”, then you’re not really open to any other possible explanation, and those other explanations could be really fucking cool, yet you’d never know it, because you’re not really following the cosmic breadcrumbs, you’re following a story that you’ve already convinced yourself is true.

But maybe that’s just me being cynical again.
f0rrest: (Default)
What's stopping mechanics from fucking with your car after leaving it in the shop? Aren't they sort of incentivized to do this, for $$$?

“Looks like the fuel injector’s got a buildup, gonna have to get that fixed.”

How are you supposed to know that the mechanic didn't put some sort of mineral compound in the line last time you took the car in? Or that they didn't make microscopic slashes in the tires so that you’d have to get them replaced in a month? Aren't they sort of incentivized to mess with your car in subtle ways so that you’d have to bring it back to the shop for more work to be done? Isn't the entire automotive repair industry kind of contingent on cars breaking down? Aren't they sort of incentivized to do this? Don't mechanics have sales goals or quotas or whatever? Aren't they pretty much just on the honor system? Why are they blindly afforded these high levels of trust? Is it because of the $$$ involved? Is it because we just assume they won't fuck with our cars because, if they get caught, they'll lose business? Is it the capitalistic exchange that protects these mechanics from scrutiny? Is it competition, is competition why we assume they'll do good work, so that we don't go someplace else? What if all the local repair shops are in cahoots? And what's really stopping them from fucking with our cars if they do it in such a way that’s almost impossible to trace back to them? There's pretty much nothing stopping them. We have no idea what they're doing to our cars in those shops. We just assume that the mechanic is having a good day and has already met his monthly quota or whatever and so we trust that he won't fuck with our cars, yet we still take all the valuables out of our cars before dropping them off because, per the sign in the main lobby, WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOST OR STOLEN ITEMS LEFT IN THE VEHICLE.

We’ll trust them to fix our cars but we won't trust them with anything else. Go figure.

And what about doctors, are they not sort of incentivized to fuck with our bodies in the same way a mechanic might be incentivized to fuck with our cars, you know for $$$? Like if you have cancer and you're getting chemotherapy or whatever, what's stopping the doctor from sabotaging the treatment? Isn't it true that the longer you're sick, the more the hospital gets paid? And how do insurance companies fit into all of this? Don't they make money from people being sick? And the pharmaceutical industry, isn't that whole industry reliant on people being sick? And don't we already acknowledge that pharmaceutical companies artificially jack up prices with no fucks given toward those sick people? Daraprim? Humira? Insulin? Isn't this like a confirmed thing? Aren't these systems ripe for abuse, because of $$$? And don't these medical industries all kind of work together? Like I remember when I was a kid, I would go to the dentist and they would clean my teeth, and afterwards they would say my teeth were fucked up, so they'd refer my mom to an orthodontist, and that orthodontist would then give their whole spiel about how my teeth were coming in crooked and how I needed braces and all that, and then they'd convince my mom to put all that metal in my mouth, which was very painful, and then they'd charge an arm and a leg for the whole procedure plus regular monthly check-ins, and how if we couldn't pay it upfront they would put us on a generous payment plan of $50 per month, and then after like a year of braces, they'd be like, “oh you actually need more braces,” and this happened like three times, until eventually I just stopped brushing my teeth, which forced the orthodontist to take off the braces, only to find out later that this whole braces thing was for cosmetic reasons, like there was no serious risk of medical complications from my teeth being kind of crooked to begin with, thus revealing that the whole procedure was kind of vain and pointless, and you have to figure that the dentist got some sort of $$$ kickback from the whole referral process. And furthermore, you have to figure that whenever some child psychologist or whatever prescribes some hyperactive kid Adderall, that they, the doctors, get some sort of kickback from that as well, be it through free samples or lucrative speaking engagements at pharmaceutical conferences or special funding to the doctor’s practice, thus incentivizing doctors to prescribe as many drugs to people as possible, with no fucks given toward the long-term, life-changing side effects of prolonged use of psychoactives, which the doctor may then use as an excuse to just prescribe more drugs, thus prescribing drugs to treat the side effects of other drugs, and then maybe they'd prescribe even more drugs for the side effects of the drug they prescribed for the side effects of the first drug they themselves prescribed, and so on, all for $$$.

Am I being paranoid here? Is this like totally crazy? I mean, I don’t want to be cynical about everything, but this $$$ stuff seems like it could maybe possibly drive some seriously bad behaviors. Like, if the goal is to be profitable, you can’t just sell one thing and be done with it, you have to ensure the future selling of things, be it medical procedures, drugs, fuel injectors, tires, and of course consumer goods.

Like, electronics companies, aren’t they sort of already doing this type of thing? Isn’t it pretty much confirmed that smartphone manufacturers design their products to be obsolete within a few years? Doesn’t Apple push software updates to soft-brick their old phones, requiring you to buy newer models? Aren’t slimy dudes in suits on Zoom calls right now discussing their planned obsolescence strategy for fiscal year 2026? Isn’t the whole electronics industry contingent on shit breaking? Hell, isn’t almost every consumer-goods industry reliant on shit breaking? Surely they can’t build products that last forever, where’s the $$$ in that?

The other day, I learned that there’s a lightbulb in Livermore, California that has been shining since 1901. That’s literally over 100 years. And after learning about this, I thought to myself, why do I have to change the lightbulbs in my house like at least once a year? Where are all these centennial lightbulbs? And, looking into this, I found out that, in the 1940s, there was this secret cartel of lightbulb manufacturers, General Electric being part of it, that conspired to ensure that any lightbulb sold would last no longer than 1,000 hours. They literally built a 1,000-hour cap into all their lightbulbs, despite the fact that those same lightbulbs could literally last for decades. And, back then, when this was found out, it was kind of a huge scandal, and a lot of reputations and egos were hurt, but now this practice is commonplace, not only among light bulb manufacturers, but with almost all electronics manufacturers, like Epson printers for example, they have a built-in “page counter” to ensure that, once like 10,000 pages are printed, the printer errors out and will not print anymore until you get the error professionally resolved or just buy a new printer. This is a confirmed thing. Look it up. And no one bats an eye. We have all sort of just accepted this planned obsolescence as the price of living in a world driven by $$$.

And if we’ve accepted this about the electronics industry, why haven’t we accepted this about other industries, like automotive repair, medical, pharmaceutical, insurance, and so on? Are we just hoping that the same $$$ incentive doesn’t apply to these other industries? Are we just deluding ourselves, pretending that the whole automotive repair industry isn’t reliant on cars breaking down, that the entire medical industry isn’t contingent on people getting sick?

And if these things are true, doesn’t this mean that one person’s suffering is another person’s $$$?
f0rrest: (kid pix w/ text)
“Our usual understanding of life is dualistic: you and I, this and that, good and bad. But actually these discriminations are themselves the awareness of the universal existence. ‘You’ means to be aware of the universe in the form of you, and ‘I’ means to be aware of it in the form of I. You and I are just swinging doors.”
—Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind


Driving north on Interstate 675, around the Dekalb County area, past the JESUS SAVES and BEEN HURT IN AN ACCIDENT? and WENDY’S SPICY CHICKEN NEXT EXIT, you'll pass a break in the thick wall of billboards and trees, and there you’ll notice a temple on a hill. This temple is fashioned in the old Laotian style, bright reds, sea greens, a brick staircase flanked by wavy three-headed dragons, big ornate double doors, a line of great golden Buddhas out front. This is the Wat Lao Buddha Phothisaram. And just a few yards before this, towering right in front of the temple itself, there's this massive billboard that reads ARE YOU COVERED? 1-800-GET-LIFE.

This is the kind of dualism we are so accustomed to seeing here in the United States of America. On one side, we have a calm place of quiet meditation, on the other, YOU ARE GOING TO DIE SOON BE AFRAID BUY NOW. It’s a striking, ironic juxtaposition, almost uniquely American, because only corporatism run amok could produce such a thing by accident. It takes a certain lack of awareness and fucks given to erect a massive life insurance billboard right in front of a Buddhist monastery. I mean, think about it, they’re trying to sell something that Buddhism is just giving away for free. And they’re trying to sell it in a flash, in a small break in the wall of trees, while we’re driving like 90 mph down busy Interstate 675, when the atoms are all blurry and smeared together. This ironic image is there, then it’s not there, but it’s still there, because it was always there. It’s there and not there at the same time, because, as the Buddhists would say, these things are the same, or something like that.

Within the last year, after reading some of Salinger’s lesser-talked-about short stories, I have developed a sort of tourist interest in Buddhism, specifically the Zen school of Buddhism, specifically the one that says “Kill the Buddha,” which sounds cool as shit and is essentially a comment on hero worship, and talks about doing things “with no gaining idea,” which means to practice something without a goal, without the intent to achieve something, as this desire to achieve something is itself a taint, as Buddhism seeks to eliminate desire as a path to Enlightenment. This “no-gain” idea is itself paradoxical because, first, it’s sort of an idea itself, and second, because why would anyone practice anything if not to achieve some sort of outcome? Doesn’t one need to desire a thing to even seek it out in the first place? Doesn’t motivation sort of hinge on the very idea of wanting the thing you are motivated for? Wouldn’t you be, like, not motivated to pursue the thing if you didn’t want the thing? Why would anyone do something if they didn't want to do it on some level? This is what drew me to Zen, the no-gain idea. I wanted to understand no-gain because it was so opposed to my first-world understanding of human psychology and ego. It made no sense to me, but in some ways, it also made perfect sense because my own desire to achieve something, be someone, has always felt a little gross to me, like a thin film of slime over my psyche. On the one hand, no-gain is a paradox, it doesn't make any logical sense, but on the other hand, it’s obvious to me that the desire to achieve something is, at its core, a selfish, egotistical desire, and selfish desires lead to angst and discontent, be it through comparison, envy, self-pity, doubt, or whatever. So it makes sense to me that stripping away desire, even stripping away the desire to strip away the desire, would lead to something like contentment, like washing away the slime, so to speak. Because when we desire something, we look at things through the lens of “have” and “have not,” and this is a destructive, dualistic path. Take, for example, in my case, “I have written a novel” and “I have not written a novel.” This is a dualistic perspective. “Have written a novel” and “Have not written a novel.” This perspective is harmful because, naturally, I start to look at writers as “those who have written a novel” and “those who have not written a novel,” and by doing this, I am bucketing people into a hierarchy of value, where writers who have written a novel are seen as more accomplished than those who have not written a novel, myself included somewhere in this value hierarchy, when really everyone is of equal value because we’re all just humans living together on this here planet in this here galaxy in this here universe, and who cares if a writer has actually written a novel or not, right? You could say, “Well, why does it have to be a value hierarchy, can't it just be a descriptive observation about the writer?” And that's fair, but if there is no value, that also means there is no value in calling it out. It is meaningless. Why even mention it? When we engage in dualistic thinking, even if our intentions are good, we are inadvertently assigning some sort of value, some sort of “have” and “have not,” some sort of “this” and “that,” some sort of “good” and “bad,” some sort of thing to achieve, and this leads down a destructive path. I don’t think I’m explaining this well, so let me just drop a rhetorical nuke bomb to make my point, that being, when we engage in dualistic thinking, we get “us” and “them,” we get “boy” and “girl,” we get “black” and “white,” we get “Aryan” and “Jew,” we get the fucking Holocaust.

So, when I first saw the Buddhist Temple Life Insurance Landmark, it sort of put me in a weird, dualistic funk. I was driving to my dad’s up Interstate 675, and I passed the break in the trees, and in that brief flash, I saw the temple and the billboard, and so I turned to my wife, who was sitting in the passenger seat reading a book, and I said, in a kind of flabbergasted tone, “Did you just see that?” And, looking up from her book, she said, “No, sorry, I missed it, what was it?” So I said, “Never mind, don’t worry about it,” and kept driving. At first, I didn’t think much of the temple and billboard, just that it was sort of darkly humorous, but over time, it started to taunt me, mock me almost, that grayscale close-up face of the solemn-looking old woman with the ARE YOU COVERED? juxtaposed against that magnificent Buddhist temple, it kept popping into my head like an intrusive thought, and I kept thinking to myself, how could a Buddhist temple exist in a place so antithetical to Buddhism? How could someone even practice Buddhism in a culture that places so much value on materialism, greed, and self-advancement? In this corporate world, isn’t Buddhism just kind of doomed to fail? Isn’t it pointless to even try? Is Buddhism even compatible with our society?

We are indoctrinated with dualism from birth. Some doctor looks at our junk and checks some sort of box. We are male or female. We are Caucasian or Hispanic or something else. Right when we pop out of the womb, some health insurance company sees us as rich or poor, and our coverage options warp around this nexus of poverty. As we grow older, our parents buy us all sorts of cool or cute toys, depending on which box was checked. Our rooms fill up with colorful plastic. We hold Daddy’s hand down the aisle at Walmart, and we pitch fits when he tells us that we can only pick one thing. He makes lists of all the other things so that he can buy them, wrap them, and place them under a big glowing tree once a year, and in this way, the whole family celebrates avarice and greed. Then we go to school the next week and brag to all our friends about all the cool or cute shit we got for Christmas, depending on which box was checked. We stare into the glow of our television sets and fantasize about being those people. Our parents tell us that we need to do well in school so that we can make a lot of money one day. We see money as a source of comfort from a young age. We look at big houses and think, “Wow, that’s a nice house,” so we grow up thinking that success is a big house. We start seeing people as big-house people and small-house people. Our teachers and parents tell us we are unique and special, so we grow up thinking we are different from everyone else. We believe our choice of clothing says something deep about who we are on the inside. Nike or Adidas. Old Navy or American Eagle. Mario or Sonic. Pepsi or Coke. Sony or Nintendo. Apple or Android. Pokemon or Digimon. Visa or Mastercard. Google or Bing. Star Wars or Star Trek. Buddhism or Corporate America. We feel strongly about these preferences. We collect things related to these preferences. Our identities become an accumulation of stuff and things. And eventually, we have kids of our own and impart these values onto them, and thus the cycle of materialism continues.

Surely, Buddhism has no place in this society. How could it? If Buddhism were like a flower, it wouldn’t even grow in this dark place.

But this wasn't all that bothered me about the temple and the billboard. What really bothered me was the fact that I myself had a problem with the juxtaposition of these things at all, because it revealed something about myself that, while I was aware of it to some extent, I hadn't really dived too deeply into. It revealed that I myself am deeply entrenched in dualism. The very fact that I notice irony stems from the fact that I am dualistic. I see things in terms of “good” and “bad,” and when a good thing is coupled with a bad thing, I see this as ironic in some way, whereas if I had no dualistic thoughts, I probably wouldn’t see the irony at all, because there wouldn’t be any. The temple and the billboard revealed that there is a darkness inside me that is conjuring all sorts of deeply ironic, sardonic observations, and I started questioning the usefulness of this. Like, would I be happier or something if I didn’t think this way? What is scoffing at the temple and the billboard actually accomplishing? Is it all some sort of weird flex, like “look how smart I am, I can point out the dark irony in situations,” and this somehow makes me feel superior or morally righteous in some way, while I myself don’t actually do anything to correct the perceived “good” and “bad” things that make up this irony I am observing? The temple and the billboard made me realize that I’m just as caught up in the same dualistic thinking as everyone else, the same dualistic thinking that drives people to put corporate billboards in front of Buddhist temples to begin with, and this realization did not sit well with me. It disturbed me, frankly. So I decided to read up on Zen Buddhism, thinking that maybe that would alleviate some of the dualistic angst I was feeling.

A couple of months ago, I ordered this book from eBay, Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind, and it never arrived. It was marked delivered, but it never got here. I contacted the seller, and they said that that was their only copy, so they gave me a refund, even though I didn't ask for one, and I didn't actually check if it got refunded. It was like ten bucks. It wasn't that important to me. I figured it was just not the right time. The universe said no, this book is not for you, please wait a little while longer. I started reading something else and forgot. That is, until a few weeks ago, on Interstate 675, when I passed the break in the trees, saw the temple and the billboard, and the questions kept piling up. Is Buddhism doomed to fail? Is Enlightenment even possible in this corporate hellscape? If I practiced Buddhist teachings, like conditioning myself not to care about materialistic things, living frugally, ditching the rat race, so to speak, wouldn’t I be harming my family, who depend on me for food and shelter and all these other things, and wouldn’t that be selfish in some way? Wouldn’t that ultimately produce bad outcomes not only for me but also for the people around me? Is Buddhism even realistic in this society, or is it just some pretentious philosophy that dudes with man-buns pretend to practice after they drink their Starbucks Mocha Choca Frapes or whatever? Should I just move on, look into some other philosophy that might be more compatible with the modern world? I wanted answers. I desired them, needed them. So I downloaded the book, put it on my Amazon-branded corporate eReader, and started reading it electronically and with great vigor.

The book was written by ShunryÅ« Suzuki, a Buddhist monk who helped spread Zen Buddhism to the United States in the 60s, and it was published in 1970, right before Suzuki’s death in 1971. The text, as you might imagine, is full of confusing, paradoxical stuff. Stuff like, “Zen is not important. Thinking things are important is dualistic thinking. But actually, Zen is very important.” And, “Kill the Buddha. Thinking someone or something is the Buddha is not the Zen way. But actually, you are the Buddha.” And, “Thinking things are ‘good’ or ‘bad’ is not so good. These are dualistic misconceptions. You will have a bad time if you think of things as ‘good’ and ‘bad.’” Of course, I’m sort of paraphrasing these quotes from large walls of text which expand on these ideas in way more depth, but that’s sort of the gist of the entire book. It’s a paradoxical adventure of the mind in which nearly every other sentence contradicts itself in some uniquely Buddhist way. But, out of all this paradoxical, confusing stuff, one quote stood out to me in particular and helped me grapple with the dualistic angst I had been feeling ever since bearing witness to the temple and the billboard on Interstate 675.

“Tozan, a famous Zen master, said, ‘The blue mountain is the father of the white cloud. The white cloud is the son of the blue mountain. All day long they depend on each other, without being dependent on each. The white cloud is always the white cloud. The blue mountain is always the blue mountain.’ This is a pure, clear interpretation of life. There may be many things like the white cloud and blue mountain: man and woman, teacher and disciple. They depend on each other. But the white cloud should not be bothered by the blue mountain. The blue mountain should not be bothered by the white cloud. They are quite independent, but yet dependent. This is how we live, and how we practice zazen.”
—Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind


And now I think that maybe corporate America needs Buddhism just as much as Buddhism needs corporate America. These things are different but the same. They depend on each other but are also entirely independent. If there were no desire and materialism, there would be no Buddhism, and if there were no Buddhism, there would be no desire and materialism. This is just the way things are. These things are in perfect harmony with each other because all things are in perfect harmony with each other.

This is what I have come to learn, with my beginner’s mind, and it all started on Interstate 675, which, fun fact, is actually connected to every other road in mainland America, so it’s not really Interstate 675, it’s actually just one long, winding road that connects everyone to everyone else. Literally every road in mainland America is connected, isn’t that interesting?

This is what I have come to learn, with my beginner’s mind.

f0rrest: (kid pix w/ pkmn cntr)
Back when I was a kid, when I would ask my dad to buy me some new game that was beyond my monthly allowance, he would always say something like, “Son, you'll appreciate this game more if you work for it, if you save up and buy it with your own hard-earned money.” And back then, when I was like 12, I resented him for being cheap or cruel or whatever, and then, when I was a bit older, I figured he was just trying to force his oppressive conservative worldview down my throat, which made me resent him even more, but now, after playing Final Fantasy XI for over two decades, I now know he was simply trying to teach his stubborn young son a very valuable lesson.

A few weeks ago, I started playing Final Fantasy XI again. I've been playing this game on and off since the early 2000s. On my current character, which I’ve had since 2013 or something, I’ve played the game for something like 103 days, 30 hours, and 15 minutes, according to the in-game playtime tracker, but in actuality, I’ve played the game far longer than that, considering I’ve had many characters. It's one of those formative core games for me. It's a massively multiplayer online role-playing game, meaning people run around in real time battling monsters, crafting furniture, gardening, fishing, and all sorts of other stuff. And while remaining the same core game over these two decades, it has changed a lot over the years, and I wanted to write about these changes because they align well with something I've been thinking about lately, that something being Instant Gratification and how it relates to feelings of accomplishment.

From the game’s debut in 2003 to the release of its fifth expansion, Seekers of Adoulin, in 2013, Final Fantasy XI was an absolutely brutal game, probably the most brutal online game on the market outside of Everquest, the game that actually inspired many of Final Fantasy XI’s mechanics. After creating your character from a list of classes and races, all with their own unexplained strengths and weaknesses, and then selecting your hometown, which provided special unexplained benefits depending on your race selection, the game would just drop you into the world of Vana’diel with no guidance whatsoever. Games were like this back then, they treated players like intelligent adults, able to figure things out on their own, rather than ADHD-diagnosed toddlers who require constant hand holding, but Final Fantasy XI took this design philosophy to an extreme. It didn’t tell you where to go. It didn’t tell you what to do. It didn’t even bother to explain core mechanics like how to navigate menus and control your character, which involved weird hotkeys, a complicated macro system with its own coding language built in pretty much, and an obtuse movement system requiring one hand on the numpad at all times. You only got a few Gil and some starter equipment at the very beginning of the game, and what you did after that was totally up to you. Many players quit within the first few hours, frustrated by all the electronic mystification going on, some demanded refunds, I imagine, and those who stuck with it were rewarded with one of the most time-consuming grinds in video game history.

The grind went something like this, if you started in Bastok, you’d wander out into the Gustaberg region and whack bees with your sword or spells or baghnakhs or whatever, depending on your job class, gaining paltry amounts of experience per kill. I think it required 500 experience points to get from level 1 to level 2, and each bee rewarded about 50 to 100 experience points, and then it required 750 to get to the next level, but with each level the number of experience points rewarded from bees went down, so you’d have to start killing worms until the next level, which required 1,000 experience points, at which point you’d graduate to lizards until the next level, which required 1,250 experience points, at which point you'd graduate to Quadavs, and so on, each level taking progressively longer, until eventually you reached level 13 or so, at which point you could no longer level up by yourself because monsters now did far more damage to you than you did to them. And at that point, many players would switch to a different job class, level that job to 13 or so, then select a new job class and do it all over again. Some would branch off into crafting and fishing, others would just unsubscribe and give up, because what were they supposed to do, just let worms and bees and lizards and Quadavs kill them over and over again? Where’s the fun in that? But the few adventurous masochists who stuck with it would eventually notice someone in town soliciting other players to form a party. They would see something like {Looking for Party} {Red Mage} 13 {Valkurm Dunes}, the brackets being the game’s built-in auto-translate feature. That masochistic player might even join said party, at which point they’d discover that the party required four more players to be efficient, preferably a healer and a debuffer and a couple damage dealers, which required more in-town shouting and private messaging. Eventually, after about an hour of soliciting, a party of six would be formed, at which point this party of six had to trek to where the good experience-yielding monsters were, Valkurm Dunes, which was very far away, and that would take another hour or so, maybe even longer, especially if one of the party members died along the way, which was very easy to do, because there were aggressive monsters all along the path from Bastok to the Dunes, and dying meant you were teleported back to town, meaning you had to start the trek all over again. You could also Level Down upon death, which was a nice added kick in the crotch. But eventually, the party would make it to Valkurm Dunes, at which point a camp had to be established, a little corner of the map where you could pull high-level monsters and defeat them comfortably, but the problem was that multiple parties were already there, at the Dunes, already using all the good camping spots, so you had to compete with other people just to find a good camp, which caused all sorts of drama and would take another hour or so, which is all to say that Final Fantasy XI did not respect your time, like, at all. Then you’d spend the next four to five hours fighting lizards over and over again, gaining paltry amounts of experience with each kill, leveling up slowly over several days, until eventually you unlocked your subjob, itself needing to be leveled sufficiently to match your main job, so you would repeat the whole Bastok-to-Gustaberg-to-Dunes grind once more, maybe several times more, until you reached level 20 with multiple jobs, but by this point you probably had a main job already in mind for your character, so you stuck with that job, say it was Red Mage, and you kept playing Red Mage, partying with other players, gaining experience, to the point where you had invested so much time and energy into Red Mage that you yourself felt like a real-life Red Mage almost, like this job class was now part of your identity, and the players you had partied with would also start thinking of you as a Red Mage, sometimes private messaging you with party invites days later, “Forrest, don’t you play Red Mage, we need a healer, do you want to party in the Dunes?” Meaning you partied in the Dunes as Red Mage a whole bunch, until eventually you reached level 20 or whatever, at which point you could no longer party in the Dunes because the monsters didn’t give good experience to level 20 players and joining a party of lower-level players actually penalized experience point gain for all of those players, so you were forced to move on, leave the Dunes, so you asked around and learned that you now needed to party at Qufim Island, which was also far away and required you to carefully trek across the vast landscape of Vana’diel, avoiding all the dangerous monsters that you yourself could not defeat. And at that point, after the long trek, you joined a party in Qufim, and you partied there for a week or so, until eventually you graduated from Qufim, at which point you needed to go to Yuhtunga Jungle, but this required an airship pass, which required the completion of a quest that involved collecting items with very low drop rates from incredibly dangerous parts of Vana’diel, incredibly dangerous parts of Vana’diel that could not be traveled alone, so you needed a party for this too, so you would solicit and solicit and solicit until eventually you found other players to help, sometimes crossing paths with the very same people you had spent hours partying with in the Dunes before. But you couldn't just level up and expect to get into any old party. At a certain point, you needed good gear, armor, weapons, rings, earrings, capes, et cetera. Gear was very important. Around level 30, if you didn't have the right gear, your battle performance would suffer, so people would scoff and jeer and refuse to let you join their parties. So you had to get the good gear, one, because you had to produce the big damage numbers, and two, because some of the gear was just cool as fuck aesthetically, like Final Fantasy XI has some of the best-looking armor sets in role-playing game history, stuff that looks super dope without being over-designed and tacky like a lot of later Final Fantasy armor designs are, and if you don’t believe me just Google the Magus Attire set and see for yourself. So you had to get the good gear, it was not optional. But the good gear was incredibly grueling to obtain. Some gear required the completion of quests that took you to locations in Vana’diel that were just not hospitable at all, places that no level 50 Red Mage could possibly survive alone, meaning you often had to party up to complete these quests. And some gear required you to defeat rare monsters that only spawned once per day and only dropped the gear like literally 1% of the time, the drop rates in Final Fantasy XI back then being insane and almost hostile to the player, and these rare monsters would be camped by other players who needed the same gear, meaning often you’d have to wait at the rare monster’s spawn location for hours while ten other people also waited at this same spawn location, everyone eagerly watching their screens, just waiting to tag the rare monster when it spawned so that they could get the good gear before anyone else, which caused all sorts of drama, but of course this was all made easier with the help of friends, which, by now, after literal days of playtime, you had made several friends, so you’d hit these friends up, ask them for help obtaining that cool rare sword you needed, Nadrs, which dropped at a 14% rate from Cargo Crab Colin who only spawned once every six real-life hours and was heavily camped by other players. And if that seems like a very specific example, that's because I did that, I farmed that crab, back when I was like sixteen. I remember my mom came into my room one morning, “What’cha doing?” and I told her I was waiting for this damn crab to spawn so I could get my cool sword, and then, like 12 hours later, before she was going to bed, she came up to check on me, and she said, “Are you still waiting for that crab to come out of its hole?” And I said, “Yes mom, I’m still waiting for that crab to come out of its hole.” And eventually I did get Nadrs, but it was only after some other players had stolen the monster from me and after I had messaged my in-game friend to come help me camp the damn thing, which was the point in my Final Fantasy XI career that I figured it out, the whole point of the game, the draw, if you will.

That was the point when I understood what made Final Fantasy XI so special, the true magic of the game, the whole draw of the Final Fantasy XI experience. I figured it out. After camping Cargo Crab Colin, and after literal weeks of partying in the Dunes, and after dying many times on my trek to Qufim, after becoming discouraged, getting frustrated, getting pissed, after all that stuff, I figured it out. I realized that although this game neither held my hand nor respected my time, it was the journey itself, the hardships, the frustrations, and quite literally the friends I made along the way that made Final Fantasy XI a truly magical experience. I realized that by being so difficult and obtuse, Final Fantasy XI basically forced me to work with those around me, forced me to build partnerships, forced me to make connections. The hardships that came along with life in Vana’diel brought us all closer together, fostered a sense of community, made Vana’diel feel like a real, living, breathing place, a second life almost. But this was not all that made Final Fantasy XI so special, there was one other thing. Accomplishment. There was this overwhelming feeling of accomplishment that came with even the simplest of tasks in Final Fantasy XI. Learning how to control your character. Killing your first bee in Gustaberg. Joining your first party. Making it to the Dunes the first time. Obtaining your first cool piece of gear. All of these things, while simple in theory, felt like real accomplishments, and they felt like real accomplishments because there was no instant gratification here. The fact that Final Fantasy XI was an utter timesink, combined with the fact that it was incredibly hostile to the player, made every little thing feel like a grand achievement, because at the end of the day, when I had just finished my long trek to Qufim, or after I had just spent twelve hours getting that cool sword from the rare crab, I could sit back and say, I did it, despite all the bullshit, I did it, and look what I have to show for it.

Now, side note, there is something to be said here about digital achievements that, when viewed from a certain perspective, can make the previous paragraph seem somewhat sad and pathetic, like surely there is some commentary that could be made here about the vacuousness of collecting what essentially amounts to pixels on a screen and how collecting such things might be a poor replacement for real-life accomplishments, and I’m sympathetic to argument, I get it, but that is not the point I’m trying to make here.

The point I’m trying to make here, the thesis if you will, is that feelings of accomplishment seem to be directly related to hardship and suffering, or what my old man would call “hard work.” It seems that the more effort you put into achieving something, the more important that achievement feels. And conversely, when something is just handed to you, that feeling of accomplishment is either diminished or just doesn’t exist at all.

You see, I’ve been playing Final Fantasy XI for a long time, and the game has changed a lot over these past two decades. Around 2013, Square Enix essentially made the game far easier than it once was. At first, they added a level sync feature, which allowed high-level players to party with low-level players, which made partying much easier. And then, around the same time, they added new ways to gain experience points, which made leveling faster overall. And then later, they added a mechanic called “Trusts”, which are summonable NPC party members, meaning you no longer have to party with other players at all, you can just use Trusts instead, and this sort of destroyed the community feeling of the game in a way, making the leveling experience essentially a solo affair. And these Trusts are pretty much broken, being incredibly over-powered, so partying in the Dunes went from being a strategic thing with real people to a mindless thing with fake computer people, and leveling at this point was far faster than before, as experience yield is now super high per monster, meaning you can pretty much level a job from level 1 to 99 in a few days if you put your mind to it. But not only that, in an effort to make the game more accessible to a new generation, Square Enix made it far easier to obtain good gear, making most of it purchasable from merchant NPCs using easy-to-obtain currencies, meaning there is no longer a need to farm Cargo Crab Colin at all, unless you really want to, because you can just get a cool sword from the merchant instead. And, having played in all eras of the game, I can confidently say that that feeling of accomplishment the game once produced is just no longer there. Everything is easy now. There is no hardship. No suffering. No hard work required. Nothing. The game feels like some sort of Instant Gratification Machine or something now.

The other day, I was leveling the Corsair job class, and I wanted to wear this special race-specific set of armor. And from my experience having played the game, I knew that this armor could only be obtained by opening chests in Gusgen Mines, and these chests spawn every few hours, and they only contain the armor on specific days of the in-game week, and I had to open at least four of these chests, and to open these chests, I needed a special key that only drops from specific monsters in the Mines, but I had forgotten which monsters dropped these keys, so I went to Google. I pulled up the wiki page of the armor and saw that, as of like 2020, you can now simply purchase this entire armor set from a merchant in Bastok. This made me both annoyed and curious. So I calculated the time it would take me to farm the chests, which would be several days, and I compared that to the time it would take me to simply buy the armor set, which would take me several minutes, and then I considered the fact that I am a grown adult with children and a job, and I said, you know what fuck it, and I just bought the armor set from the merchant.

And now, I’m almost level 99 on Corsair, which took me like three days, and I’m wearing this cool-looking armor set, but I feel nothing, nothing at all.
f0rrest: (kid pix w/ text)
“All plots tend to move Deathward. This is the nature of plots. Political plots, terrorist plots, lovers’ plots, narrative plots, plots that are part of children’s games. We edge nearer Death every time we plot. It is like a contract that all must sign, the plotters as well as those who are the targets of the plot.” 
―Don DeLillo, White Noise 


Death, perhaps life’s greatest mystery. What is Death? Where does it come from? Why is it a thing? Neither the what, nor the where, nor the when, nor even the why is known to mortals. Why, why do we die? What's the purpose? Where does consciousness go? Are our souls recycled, inserted into new life upon Death? Do we end up in some sort of Mysterious Otherside? Heaven? Hell? Valhalla? The great recycling plant in the sky? Perhaps we are consumed by Earth herself, fated to be nothing more than nutrients for the soil? Worm food, is that it? No one knows the answer. There are all sorts of theories, some scientific, some mystical, but no one really knows, and those who claim otherwise are almost certainly deluding themselves.

The most I know about Death is from the beginning of Castlevania: Symphony of the Night, when Alucard, in all his bishonen glory, equipped with his most powerful artifacts, comes sprinting into Dracula’s castle, super cool afterimages trailing in his wake, only to be met by the floating specter of Death himself in all his cloaked skeletal grimness. “I’ve come to put an end to this,” Alucard says, to which Death responds, “You shall regret those words,” before stripping Alucard of all his artifacts, laughing a chilling laugh, and vanishing with an ominous warning, “We shall meet again.” This leaves Alucard effectively newborn and defenseless at the very start of the game until he powers himself up by collecting his stolen artifacts strewn all over the castle, around which point he crosses paths with Death again and stomps him good. But Death is never truly defeated. He returns again and again with each subsequent game, all while some valiant new hero goes dashing Deathward, which I'm sure symbolizes some profound thing that I haven't quite figured out just yet, but maybe I will stumble across it by writing this journal entry? Don't count on it.

This journal entry is not actually about Castlevania, however, it’s mostly about Death, and also White Noise by Don DeLillo, which is a novel that has been marinating in my mind ever since I finished reading it about two weeks ago. The book was first published in 1985 and is considered one of DeLillo’s best works, although this is the first novel I've read by him, so I don't really have much to compare it to. I got interested in DeLillo after seeing his name come up time and time again in reference to authors similar to David Foster Wallace, and I figured the best place to start was with DeLillo’s most popular novel, White Noise. I quickly found that the only similarity between DeLillo and Wallace is the fact that they write about similar subject matter, that being the subtle perils of modern life, ruminations on mindless entertainment and vacuous celebrity worship and the numerous distractions we all willingly engage in, both authors trying to tease out why it all feels so empty and gross. DeLillo, however, is a much more mature writer than Wallace. Reading DeLillo, one gets the impression that he has nothing to prove to anyone, even himself. He uses short, simple sentences. He doesn’t mess around with complex runaway paragraphs. He doesn’t overuse semicolons or em dashes or footnotes or whatever to make some kind of literary point. He has things to say and thoughts to express, and he does these things in a very to-the-point manner. There’s no fluff, no pointless wordplay. Every sentence, every word, every punctuation mark feels like it has a purpose. You never get the impression that DeLillo is doing the whole literary “Look Dad, no hands” thing, and because of this, his writing is very easy to digest, and not in a vacuous, unmemorable way either, because despite all his stylistic simplicity, the writing is still somehow multi-layered, full of double meanings and triple meanings that, considering how simple some of the stuff he writes is, kind of makes your head spin in a sort of “How the fuck is he doing this?” sort of way. Basically, if you can’t tell, I really like Don DeLillo’s style. I think he’s a brilliant writer.

And White Noise is a brilliant book that I would recommend to anyone. It’s a fast read, like 300 pages, and I read it in a few days on account of how engrossing it is. The dialogue in particular is fascinating in this darkly humorous way, and it’s written in the first-person perspective, which is my favorite perspective, so make of that what you will. The story is told from the point of view of a university professor specializing in “Hitler Studies” who is so afraid of Death that he comes up with all sorts of absurd plots and intellectualizations to hand-wave it away, all while being constantly thrown into situations that exacerbate his fear of Death, which results in a constant stream of humorous situations, like in the second act when this toxic-chemical tanker crashes, resulting in a billowing cloud of poisonous gas ominously hanging over the main character’s town, which, if I were to analyze, is a potent metaphor for Death’s looming influence over our lives. The novel also covers themes like rampant consumerism, family dynamics, and academic pretentiousness, all filtered through a sort of dark-comedy lens, which has resulted in many critics hailing the book as a quote-unquote “postmodern masterpiece of our age,” and I use the tag “postmodern” here kind of flippantly because I don't actually know what the fuck that means, and I don’t think Don DeLillo knows what it means either because he basically said something like “Postmodern? I don’t know what the fuck that means” in an old interview from 2010, which he later clarified by saying, “I think of postmodernism in terms of literature as part of a self-referring kind of art, people attach a label to writers or filmmakers or painters to be able some years in the future to declare that the movement is dead,” which illustrates that maybe Don DeLillo himself also has a preoccupation with Death, so perhaps there’s something autobiographical going on here too.

So, basically, White Noise is about Death, among other things. I had originally planned to write about the novel immediately after finishing it, but I kept putting it off because, well, surprise surprise, I guess I don't really like thinking about Death too much. In fact, I rarely ever think about Death, but the same cannot be said for the two main characters of White Noise, Jack and Babette, who are deathly afraid of Death and literally think about it all the time, and they have pretty logically convincing fears, too, considering Death is literally all around us just waiting to swoop in and take us away to the Mysterious Otherside, like you could step on a pebble the wrong way causing you to fall and bonk your head and that’s it you’re dead, or you could be watching your favorite television program while eating grapes and then all of a sudden a grape goes down the wrong tube and cough cough you’re dead, or you could be sleeping and your heater starts malfunctioning thus putting out some sort of invisible odorless gas and you never wake up because you're fucking dead, or you could be on a walk on a nature trail or something and you somehow touch some innocuous-looking plant and you have some ultra-rare allergic reaction to it and suddenly you’re throwing up and then bye bye dead, or you could be walking downtown and some random thing just falls on your head and bam dead, or a plane could just crash into your home for example, or you could be crossing the road and some drunk dude just doesn’t stop at the light and all of a sudden your guts are all over the windshield and just like that you’re dead, or your body could just say NO and trigger a brain aneurysm and that's it see ya you’re dead, and so on. Neither the what, nor where, nor when, nor even the why is known to mortals. No one knows. It's almost so absurd that it's not even worth worrying about, at least that's how I view it, like if I could die at any time, in ways often outside of my own conscious control, why expend time and effort worrying about it? Why get worked up? Why ruin my day? And that’s why I don’t fear Death, because like what’s the point?

But after reading White Noise and upon reflection, it turns out I was wrong, I do fear Death. Maybe I don't consciously fear Death, but I certainly subconsciously fear Death, at least on some sort of deep biological level. After reading White Noise, I started analyzing my habits, my daily routines, things like that, and came to the realization that maybe everything I do is actually motivated by some latent fear of Death, like Death is this terrifying primordial silence just lingering there in the background of things, always influencing literally everything I do, and I hadn’t even realized it until just recently. I started thinking that maybe even the stuff I do that seems so far removed from fear-of-Death, like reading and writing and playing video games, is actually just a subconscious distraction from the ever-present biological fear of Death. Maybe all the bullshit I do to keep myself occupied actually functions as a sort of white noise to drown out the silence of Death. This idea was new to me, and it spooked me a little bit. I didn’t understand it, but I wanted to. So I went on a quest to understand it, which involved the writing of this journal entry, and this quest led me to the soft conclusion that it’s likely very possible that everything we do is actually some sort of Death Avoidance Behavior.

There's obvious Death Avoidance Behaviors, like eating so that we don't starve, drinking so that we don't dehydrate, finding shelter so that we don't die of exposure, avoiding vicious animals so that we don't get mauled, forming communities so that we can help each other survive, establishing rules so that we don't take advantage of or kill each other, and so on, which, in the modern world, manifests as things like working shitty jobs so that we can buy food and afford a place to live, buying cars so that we can travel to all the places that supply various life-sustaining things, wearing clothes or whatever, obeying laws so that we don't end up getting murdered in jail or whatever, brushing our teeth and taking showers and whatnot, getting married and having children so that we can form our own close-knit communities so that we can have life-sustaining support systems, and so on, which is all very obvious stuff. But then there’s the less obvious stuff, like watching television or reading a book or playing a video game or writing a journal entry or painting a sunset or performing in a play or dancing on Saturdays or playing tennis or whatever, all so that we don’t quite literally bore ourselves to Death because, I suspect, if we just sit on our asses all day doing literally nothing, we’ll start thinking a little too much about our own mortality and thus the fear of Death will start creeping in. Maybe boredom is actually a latent fear of Death, our bodies telling us that we better getting moving because one day we will just up and die. Death is always there, in the background. So we distract ourselves. We turn on the white noise. Otherwise, we become depressed, despondent, miserable, all those dark adjectives that only serve to bring us Deathward, be it through suicide or self-neglect or whatever. What I’m trying to say is, it seems like everything we do is some sort of Death Avoidance Behavior, even the stupid behavior that seems counterintuitive to staying alive, like overeating food packed with high-fructose corn syrup or binge drinking alcohol or vegging out in front of a screen for hours or injecting heroin into our veins, these things serve as sort of Misguided Death Avoidance Behaviors, because even though this behavior is harmful, potentially bringing us closer to Death, they make us feel good in the short term by doing a really good job of drowning out the silence of Death, even if only temporarily, which becomes extra complicated when addiction comes into play, creating a sort of paradoxical Death trap wherein by trying to avoid the fear of Death you are actually hastening your own Death, or something like that, which only serves to show how cruel biology can be sometimes, tricking us Deathward. And we do these good and bad things, obviously, because Death just keeps showing up in each subsequent Castlevania game, he just doesn't go away, he is an ever-present force. Death is a hard-coded fact of life, and coming face to face with this is just downright unpleasant.

At first, this all struck me as very grim and depressing, but after finishing White Noise and ruminating on it a little bit, my perspective changed.

In White Noise, there’s this drug that basically eliminates the fear of Death. The main character becomes obsessed with this drug and comes up with all sorts of plots and schemes to get their hands on it, eventually leading them to the creator of the no-fear-of-Death drug. The creator of the drug turns out to be a man living in a cheap motel room. And from the very first scene with this man, we can tell that he’s obviously addicted to the no-fear-of-Death drug. He has eliminated the fear, drowned out the silence, conquered Death. He’s sitting in an uncomfortable metal chair in the middle of the room, no lights on, surrounded by broken bottles and candy bar wrappers and flies and stuff, just staring up into this little television set mounted in the corner of the room, mumbling to himself. He has clearly not bathed or groomed himself in months. He’s just wasting away, dying pretty much. He is no longer living life. He is just there, existing, doing pretty much nothing. The text makes it clear that this man is a sad, pathetic excuse for a man, a hollow shell, a ghost almost, someone who is both alive and dead simultaneously.

But he doesn’t care, why would he? He has no fear of Death.
f0rrest: (kid pix w/ pkmn cntr)
“Conditioned place preference (CPP) is a form of Pavlovian conditioning used to measure the motivational effects of objects or experiences. This motivation comes from the pleasurable aspect of the experience, so that the brain can be reminded of the context that surrounded the encounter.”

Nostalgia has dominated my life since as far back as I can remember. I imagine this might be true for everyone to some extent, but my extent feels extreme to the extreme. I have a deep, almost unhealthy fondness for times long past, always have. Carefree childhood summers playing PS1 role-playing games at my grandma’s house. Super Smash Bros. competitions in the basements of suburbia. Staying up all night with a good friend in the same room playing our own separate games on our own separate television sets, having our own separate but shared experiences, just talking and laughing and having a good time. Cozying up in front of my old Dell XPS with a Diet Cherry Cola and some pretzels, playing online games from sunrise to sunset, curtains drawn, enveloped in the glow of warm orange lamplight, losing myself completely in those games, the ego falling away, as if I didn’t really exist in the physical realm but in the digital one. That sort of thing. I long to return to these situations, situations I could never possibly return to, so I chase the feeling, try to recreate it. I foster atmospheres redolent of times and places long gone. I do this through carefully controlled lighting, surrounding myself with certain material things, listening to music I used to listen to during those little epochs, and, most of all, playing the video games I enjoyed as a child and young adult. Video games elicit the strongest sense of nostalgia for me. If I had to analyze it scientifically, I’m guessing the medium’s mixture of aural, visual, and physical stimuli releases the most dopamine or something. I spent so much of my youth in front of a screen that my eyes are like permanently tattooed with a glowing box. I associate epochs of my life with certain video games, and I chase these video games relentlessly, meaning I replay them over and over, pretending I’m back there, pretending I’m feeling the feelings I once felt, as if no time has passed at all. For me, nostalgia is like a cheap time machine, one that has no forward option, only back, and when it takes me back, everything is faded, like I’m sort of phased out, relegated to a background plane, unable to truly interface with what I’m experiencing, but it feels good, so I keep doing it, as if nostalgia is like a CAT-1 controlled substance injected straight into the eyeballs that produces a withdrawal so wicked that I have to keep doing more and more just to feel a slight semblance of whatever it was I felt the first time. I cultivate situations reminiscent of old situations thereby creating new situations based on old situations that are never as good as the original situations but they're better than nothing so I keep doing it. Nostalgia, for me, is like a killer of new joys. I am averse to new things because they do not elicit the same nostalgic dopamine response as old things. There is something biologically harsh about all of this, something having to do with the brain and chemicals and questions of free will that I don’t like to analyze too deeply. I say things like, “I know this is a boomer thing to say, but games are actually much worse than they used to be,” pretending that my self-deprecation backs up the claim, when in reality I lack the knowledge to back up the claim because I have not actually played a new game in like five years. The last five games I’ve played are The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, Final Fantasy VIII, Chrono Cross, Pokémon Crystal, and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, all of which I associate with the elysian fields of my youth, blissful meadows wherein I popped Adderall recreationally to get euphorically lost in the games. I was prescribed Adderall from age 10 to 20. Adderall made me feel like I was part of the game’s world, like I was actually the hero holding the sword and casting the magicks and saving the world. Nothing else was important when I took Adderall. For most of my childhood, I was a character in a video game. I developed a fondness for digital places and things. My nostalgia is not linked to fields and meadows in the real world, but fields and meadows in the virtual plane. I feel as if this is a big problem but can’t quite place my finger on why. I cannot help but think this is a uniquely twenty-first-century problem, what with so many digital worlds available to get lost in. There’s also something incredibly sad and consumeristic about the whole thing, because it means that so much of my nostalgia is branded with corporate logos. Nintendo, Sony, The Walt Disney Company, Microsoft, Apple, Electronic Arts, SEGA, and most of all, Square Enix.

“Amphetamine has been shown to produce a conditioned place preference in humans taking therapeutic doses, meaning that individuals acquire a preference for spending time in places where they have previously used amphetamine.”


Out of all the games I have ever played, Final Fantasy XI, developed and published by Square Enix, produces the strongest nostalgic response for me. Final Fantasy XI is a massively multiplayer online role-playing game released back in 2003, and I’ve been playing it on and off since then. I must have been 12 years old when I first installed the game on the Dell-whatever PC that my mom bought and so naively placed in my childhood bedroom. My first character’s name was “Butterfly,” a lanky male Elvaan with jagged, chin-length black hair. I remember this vividly. Back then, I was taking Adderall in therapeutic doses as prescribed by the pediatric psychiatrist. It was thought that Adderall would improve my ability to focus in school, but all it did was improve my ability to focus on video games. I remember the game launcher, the PlayOnline Viewer, would boot up to some of the most sublime free jazz I had ever heard. Music so powerful that, even thirty years later, hearing it instantly makes me want to play Final Fantasy XI again, like some sort of Pavlovian response. The massive, bustling world of Vana’diel blew my little adolescent brain with its dense forests and rolling meadows and arid cliffs and windy grasslands full of windmills and monsters and beastmen who lingered just outside the sprawling cities wherein actual people behind their virtual fantasy avatars congregated at the fountains and auction houses, wearing their subligars and lizard jerkins and scorpion harnesses and haubergeons, their scimitars and staves and zaghnals and baghnakhs and halberds all tightened to their backs or clipped to their belts or whatever. Massive airships would fly over the cities, taking players wherever they needed to go, which was an absolutely breathtaking spectacle, and a technical marvel when you consider that people were actually up there on those airships. I remember I would stand in the markets of Bastok and just watch in awe as high-level players walked by, hoping that one day, with enough effort, I would be powerful and cool just like them. The pastoral, grounded soundtrack working its way into my undeveloped brain the whole time, tattooing itself there, ensuring that, in the future, whenever I heard the music, no matter where I was in life, I would be instantly transported back there, mentally. But back then, when I was 12, I had no idea how to actually play the game, spending most of my time fishing in the waterways of Bastok and getting myself killed by the giant turtle-men living in the Gustaberg region, all while, unbeknownst to my young self, the game was altering the fundamental chemistry of my brain, forming bonds with my neurons, landscaping the groundwork for all my future gaming aesthetic preferences.

“... dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens have been found to be elevated when rats are placed in the drug-paired environment, compared to the non-drug-paired environment.”

It wasn't until I was like 15 or so that I understood the basics of Final Fantasy XI. My stepdad had moved my mom and me to a fancy island resort primarily inhabited by old rich guys, meaning there were barely any kids around, meaning I had no friends, meaning I spent a lot of time playing games. It was around this time that I started abusing Adderall, hiding pills that were supposed to be taken before school and taking them after I got home, because I was now old enough to realize that this amphetamine stuff was like psychic gold, so I was using it to induce a sort of euphoric trance when playing Final Fantasy XI. I had created a new character named “Einhander,” who was also an Elvaan but had the spiky orange bowl cut. That epoch of my life must have lasted about a whole year, although the exact timeline is hazy. I remember I was listening to a lot of The Police, The Smiths, and Sting back then, and now those songs are like Pavlovian triggers, tempting reminders of Final Fantasy XI. But despite taking Adderall, which improves focus, I was rather unfocused in my approach to the game, leveling jobs up to 30 or 40 or so but then getting bored and switching to another job, only to repeat the process. And back then, leveling a job to 40 was a big deal, a big time-consuming deal, because not only were experience points divided out in very small amounts and traveling the world took literal hours from point A to point B, but also the early era of the game was all about community, meaning you couldn’t solo your way to level 30, you had to find a party of six other real people who had at least three hours to burn, and this party-finding process was often long in and of itself, involving at least an hour of shouting in town or whatever for a party, and sometimes you would go whole days without finding a party. For me, this process looked like the following, get home from school around 4, make myself some Easy Mac, eat the Easy Mac, stock up on Diet Cherry Cola, boot up my PC, stand around Jeuno looking for a party until around 6, get in a party, kill monsters for like 7 hours, get to bed around 3 in the morning or later, go to school the next day pretty much braindead, fall asleep in most of my classes, get home from school around 4, Easy Mac, Diet Cherry Cola, boot up the PC, and so on. The game’s community-minded ethos lent itself to making the world of Vana’Diel feel like a living, breathing world in which you got to know the residents because you were basically forced to, and this was one of the core draws of the game. Back then, Final Fantasy XI felt like a second life because you had to make it your second life, otherwise you wouldn't make any progress. In hindsight, this game-design philosophy is insidious, because it was clearly built around milking as much money from the player as possible, because the game has a monthly subscription fee, so the longer Square Enix can make you play, whether through entertaining means or grueling means, the more money they stand to make from you. And Final Fantasy XI is not unique in this way, this applies to pretty much all MMORPGs, as they’re all built around artificial roadblocks and harsh time constraints designed specifically to maximize profit. But of course, back then, being 15 years old and addicted to amphetamines, I didn’t analyze it in this way, I only wanted to be the coolest Red Mage on the server, which was something I didn’t achieve until years later after taking a long, long break, mostly because my Dad cracked down on me pretty hard and even sent me to military camp one summer, to correct my unfocused, juvenile behavior.

“Most drugs of abuse elicit a Conditioned Place Preference in rats and mice, and the neural substrates of these effects can often be traced to the mesolimbic DA system.”

At some point shortly after high school, when I was working at the animal shelter, a good friend of mine expressed some interest in getting into MMORPGs and asked me for my recommendation. He initially brought up World of Warcraft, which I had played for a bit back in high school but never really got sucked in, so I told him no, fuck that game, you should play Final Fantasy XI instead, it’s quite possibly the best video game ever made. And just like that, we were playing Final Fantasy XI together. I must have been like 18 or 19 or something, and for all intents and purposes I was pretty much a meth head, speed freak, tweaker, whatever you want to call it, because I was hardcore into Adderall. I also had a semi-serious girlfriend, and my mom was paying for me to go to college. But the moment my friend and I started playing Final Fantasy XI, all that stuff took a backseat, because suddenly my life was all about Vana’Diel. I had forgotten the account details to my old Einhander account, so I made a new account with a new character named “Ashleh,” and I would pretend I was an in-real-life girl in the game for some reason, which was kind of an eye-opening experience because guys truly do treat you completely different when they believe you’re a girl, even online. Anyway, my friend would come over with his laptop, pop one of my Adderalls, and we’d both be up until the wee hours of the morning playing Final Fantasy XI and drinking Diet Cherry Cola. Sometimes we’d take short breaks from the game to smoke cigarettes out on my porch, and during these breaks we’d have some of the best conversations in the world. Philosophical conversations. Gaming conversations. Absurd conversations. Philosophically absurd gaming conversations. So many inside jokes were cultivated during this period, many of which still persist between us to this day. WERMZ. WHERE U GET SWARD? Zerva was always trying to get virtually laid by female players in-game. And when my friend left, I’d play all day and night in my room. I skipped college classes, eventually dropping out. I showed up late for work every day because I could never get up on time, and eventually I just stopped showing up. I hesitate to say this, but I was in love with Final Fantasy XI, as much as a human being could love a video game, at least. My identity was intrinsically tied to the game. If something took time away from me playing the game, I would become irrationally upset in an almost drug-withdrawal-like way, like I would become dejected and fuming and just monstrous to be around. I had thrown everything away for love of the game, and it wasn’t until my girlfriend dumped my ass that I realized I had a serious fucking problem, at which point my life was already in total shambles, with only a level 90 Samurai and a blue-colored chocobo to show for it.

“In the standard conditioned place preference procedure, when the unconditioned stimulus is rewarding, rodents will be more likely to approach the compartment that contains cues associated with it. Alternatively, when the unconditioned stimulus is aversive, rodents will be more likely to escape and avoid the compartment that contains cues associated with it.”

Since then, I’ve stopped taking Adderall. I’ve gotten married. I’ve had two kids. I’ve learned to balance my obsessions with my responsibilities in a semi-manageable way. I’ve grown up. And I’ve also played Final Fantasy XI on and off, here and there, every few years. I’ve played it so much, in fact, that Ashleh is now level 99 in most jobs and I’ve got a bunch of colorful chocobos and my Mog House is full of awesome furniture. I’ve played the game so much that the epochs of my life could probably be categorized into “Was Playing Final Fantasy XI” and “Was Not Playing Final Fantasy XI.” Last time I checked, according to the in-game playtime tracker, I’ve played the game for a total of 103 days, 30 hours, and 15 minutes. That is not like “in-universe time,” that is real-world time. What I’m trying to say is, I’ve played the game a lot. And I’ve learned how to gracefully interweave playing the game with tending to my adult responsibilities quite well. I have compensated, adapted, if you will. Yet whenever I play Final Fantasy XI now, despite having grown up, I am always cognizant of the fact that I am sacrificing something else. My focus shifts ever so slightly. Something is always neglected when playing Final Fantasy XI, be it spending time with my kids or work or writing or other games or reading or whatever. Final Fantasy XI becomes my second life every time. Time must always be made for the game. It is almost like, with Final Fantasy XI, I cannot have more than two things going on in my life at once, Final Fantasy XI being one of those two things. And this scares me. It really does. It scares me so much that I haven’t played the game since March 23, 2023. Yes, I know the exact date. That’s how much it scares me.

So, when my friend from high school texted me on Halloween 2025, expressing interest in getting back into Final Fantasy XI, I was both scared to death and excited as hell, because despite knowing the game’s design philosophy is predatory, despite knowing that it has branded my nostalgia with some gross corporate logo, despite knowing that the main reason I like the game so much is probably due to some conditioned-place-preference response, despite knowing that I’ve fucked up my life by playing the game in the past, I still love the game for some reason. The game has like mutated itself into my DNA somehow. And now, faced with the temptation to play Final Fantasy XI once more, there is this internal conflict playing out in my mind. A shoulder-devil, shoulder-angel situation. I worry that I won’t be able to make time for my writing. I worry that I might skimp on my work. I worry that every second not playing the game will once again feel like some excruciatingly long prelude to playing the game. I worry that I won’t spend as much time with my kids. I worry that I’ll become so focused on playing just this one game that I won’t play anything else. And then I start telling myself stuff like who cares about playing other games, it’s all stupid entertainment anyway, why do I need to collect new memories of new stupid entertainments, why not just make new memories of old stupid entertainments, what’s the difference? And of course, I’ll give myself a strict schedule, I’ll only play Final Fantasy XI every other night on the weekdays, focus on my writing on the nights I’m not playing, and I’ll spend every weekend afternoon writing instead of playing, and I’ll never play the game when my kids are awake to ensure I spend as much time with them as possible, and I will strictly enforce this schedule and stick to the path and not stray, because I am a grown man with adult responsibilities and free will.

And just like that, I am flushed with dopamine, listening to some of the most sublime free jazz you have ever heard in your life.

time

Oct. 25th, 2025 02:08 pm
f0rrest: (Default)
About a month ago, I started wearing an analog watch, a men’s Timex Camper Military Field watch. Its round, low-profile design appealed to me. They stopped manufacturing these watches back in the ‘80s, so I couldn’t just go to the Timex website and buy one, I had to purchase one used from eBay. The watch passes an electric current through a quartz crystal that vibrates at a frequency of thirty thousand times per second. It keeps very precise time. The outer chassis is dark brown and smooth. The watch face is black with the words TIMEX QUARTZ at the top and a symbol for water near the bottom, indicating a certain level of waterproofing. The hands are white but coated in some sort of green glow-in-the-dark material, presumably so soldiers could keep time in a foxhole. In very quiet rooms, I can hear it, the passing of time. Tick tick tick. “Cesium atoms absorb microwaves with a frequency of 9,192,631,770 cycles per second, which then defines the international scientific unit for time, the second.” The strap is navy green and deteriorating, indicating a very used, timeworn watch. I sometimes wonder if this watch was worn by a soldier, if that soldier ever erased someone while wearing it, and if so, which numbers the hands were pointing at when that all went down. Do different people experience time differently? “Gravitational time dilation is a form of time dilation, an actual difference of elapsed time between two events, as measured by observers situated at varying distances from a gravitating mass.” The mayfly dies in a day, does that day feel like forever? “The lower the gravitational potential, the slower time passes, speeding up as the gravitational potential increases.” If I flung myself into a black hole, would my time stretch to infinity? What does time feel like? Does it stop for the dead? How would we ever know? I often wonder what that soldier would think now, now that some civilian is wearing his watch, would he be offended, pleased, nostalgic, would he experience some post-traumatic stress response, would he even remember? I don’t know. Where does the time go? I’m not into military stuff. I’ve never even held a gun. The first time I saw this watch was on the wrist of one MacGyver from the ‘80s television show MacGyver. It was then I knew that I had to have this watch. It was not only an aesthetic thing, but also a sentimental thing. My grandma and I used to watch the show all the time when I was a young boy. She barely remembers that, her mind and body now ravaged by the passing of time. Tick tick tick.

“Time, he's waiting in the wings. He speaks of senseless things. His script is you and me, boy.”

You will never truly feel the passing of time until you have children. This is a bold claim, I know, but it is one I fully believe. You may think you feel the passing of time now, but you will never truly feel it until you have a child of your own. No one knows the passing of time better than a parent who has discarded an old toy. The first haircut. The second haircut. The third. Tick tick tick. Dismantling the crib, replacing it with a full-sized bed with protective railings. Putting old stacking blocks and miniature farm sets and wooden alphabet puzzles in cardboard boxes. Donating the remnants of youth to Goodwill. Selling the old changing table on Facebook Marketplace. Tick tick tick. Looking at pictures taken just months ago. “When did he get so big?” The first word. The second word. The sentence. “Where did the time go?” Where does the time go? What happens to it? Do we live only in the present? “Time is probably the most measured quantity on Earth. It tells us when to wake and when to sleep, when to eat, work and play, when buses, trains and planes will depart and arrive. It helps organize and coordinate our lives.” Did the past even happen, what if we forget? Is it all relative? Semantics? Graduating from a high chair to a small table to a full-sized table. Baby formula to cow’s milk to juice and so on. Mush to hard food to Happy Meals and so forth. The first smile. The first laugh. The first steps. Diapers to pull-ups to whitey tighties to boxer shorts. Tick tick tick. “Ball” to “daddy” to “I love you” to “I hate you” to “I'm sorry” to “I'm getting a job” to “I'm moving out of the house” to “I’m getting married” to “I’ll take care of you now, Dad.” The last smile. The last laugh. The last steps. When will we know? Will we ever know, when our time comes? My twelve-year-old daughter wants so badly to be eighteen. She applies makeup and talks on the phone and wears band t-shirts for bands she doesn’t know a single song by. She is excited about getting her first period. She has no appreciation of her youth, resents it almost. She has no idea. Late at night, when I lay in bed with my two-year-old son, helping him fall asleep, I can hear the Timex, tick tick tick. “What’s that?” he says. “That’s just the passing of time, son.” Then I play rain sounds from the Smart Speaker so that he doesn't have to hear it. Tick tick tick. He liked Sesame Street, then he liked Little Bear, now he likes Paw Patrol. He's getting into Power Rangers. I have to buy him new clothes because his shirts are getting too small and his pants are becoming too tight. Pencil marks on the wall, tagged with name and date, progressively getting taller. When he blows out the candles, we celebrate out loud, but we mourn inside. He used to say mama and dada, now he says I want, I want, I want, give me that, mine. He's becoming less cuddly, more cautious, more aware. My daughter wouldn't be caught dead giving me a hug in public. She winces when I say “I love you.” The tragedy of youth is that they never appreciate it, the mercy of youth is that they have neither the experience nor the foresight to do so. They live in the moment, never dwelling on the passing of time. Imagine how awful it would be, to be young and obsessed with the passing of time, tick tick tick, always aware of your own youth slipping away. Muscles aching, wrinkles forming, thoughts muddled and confused. The young are spared this psychic dread. This comes later. I see it in my son’s deep blue eyes. A nascent spark, an intelligence just flickering into existence, soon to become a bright flame. He doesn't know it yet, but he will. Tick tick tick. Soon, it will show him.

And I’m so sorry.
f0rrest: (Default)
For a moment there, on October 18th, 2025, I became an enemy of the state, a name on some government list somewhere, a statistic. I was one of the seven million people all across the United States who participated in the No Kings Rally. I was of statistical insignificance, sure, but I was still part of it, part of a vast sea of outraged but very civil people, in what is now being called the largest peaceful protest in American history. I didn't exactly want to be there, my wife pretty much guilt-tripped me into going, but now, upon reflection, I'm glad I went, because now I’m part of history. And I imagine, in like twenty years from now, when telling this story to my grandkids, I will feel similar to how all those baby boomers feel when they talk about Woodstock.

There were a lot of older people and veterans at the No Kings protest, which surprised me. There was also a large turnout of spiky-haired people, fishnet-wearing people, and rainbow-flag-waving people, which was not so surprising. I have a shaved head, so I was worried people might think I’m a skinhead or something, but I wear a silver hoop earring and was holding a sign, MY CATS COULD DO A BETTER JOB, which had pictures of my cats taped to it, and I'm not a skinhead, so it was actually easy for me to blend into the crowd. Many people stopped to take photographs of my sign. I wondered if these photographs would end up on some old liberal’s Facebook feed. My wife held one that read THINGS ARE SO BAD EVEN THE INTROVERTS ARE HERE, which was a slogan she had read somewhere online. It was a cool, breezy day. The sky was clear, and the air was electric with excitement. People were gathered in a huge mass at the waterfront stage pavilion overlooking the great marshes just beyond the East River. A DJ played loud music from an elaborate sound system. I watched as a man holding an RIP USA sign danced to Depeche Mode’s “Enjoy the Silence” as if he were lost in some sort of trance, which seemed a little foreboding to me, like he was reveling in the oncoming destruction of America or something. Maybe this was his last dance before the silence, who knows. A woman dressed in a full-body frog costume gave a speech. “Dressed as this badass frog, I will leap over structural oppression and ribbit my grievances louder than any frog has before.” People clapped and waved signs fervently. “The current administration already has three strikes against me. First, I'm a woman. Second, I come from a family of immigrants. And third, I’m dressed as a gigantic green frog.” Everyone laughed and cheered. She talked about how the current administration is deporting people without due process and how the military is being used to oppress American citizens and how abortion should be a human right. I thought her last point called for a more nuanced discussion around human rights, where they come from, and at which point in the human maturation cycle they should be applied, but this was neither the time nor place for philosophical discussion, so I just kept my mouth shut and listened closely. She ended her speech with WE DID NOT VOTE FOR THIS and urged everyone to chant along. The voices were cacophonous. I did not participate in the chanting because it made me feel weird, like I was being manipulated in some way. This was my first ever protest. I would normally never go to one of these things. My wife pretty much guilt-tripped me into it. My two-year-old son and twelve-year-old daughter were also there. My son was darting between people's legs like a crazy person, blissfully ignorant of politics and his part in the history being made. I was a little envious of him, to tell the truth. He eventually settled at the nearby playground with all the other children. Before the actual march started, I handed my sign to my daughter and told her to be careful, then she and her mother mingled into the crowd of chanting protesters. “When I say WE WANT, you say NO KINGS.” They all marched down to city hall chanting this and other anti-Trump slogans. Some people in pickup trucks yelled at them. I stayed back at the waterfront to keep an eye on my son because there was no way in hell he was ever going to stay focused long enough to march for an entire mile. The origin of the word “march” comes from the Latin word “Martius,” which comes from the word “Mars,” meaning the Roman god of war, which makes me feel a little uncomfortable. I enjoyed the cool breeze and watched sailors on the dock tend to their fishing boats. No one was pelted with rocks, stabbed, or shot. It was all very peaceful. When the march of protesters returned, they resembled more of a parade than a protest. Afterwards, we ate at the nearby pizza joint downtown. I hadn't eaten all day, so I ate way too many slices and spent the rest of the day feeling like a gluttonous pig. There was also a mini Comic Con going on. An entire city block was sectioned off for the event. There were about eight vendor stalls lined down the street, selling Pokémon cards, video game pins, comic books, anime plushies, and 3D-printed junk. Posters portraying Trump as a king with his face crossed out were plastered all over the old brick walls. Fake cobwebs and rubbery bats and animatronic skeletons dotted every street corner. People dressed as anime characters and superheroes carried protest signs and danced in the streets. It felt like some sort of super nerdy punk rock Halloween party. One guy dressed as Michael Myers walked around real slow, flashing his fake butcher’s knife at people, which frightened my son until he figured out it was just a costume, at which point he started circling the guy, tugging at the fabric of his outfit. All in all, it was a good time, but I was left wondering, do these protests actually accomplish anything?

I confess, even before I attended the No Kings rally, I had my doubts about the effectiveness of peaceful protests against tyrannical governments. It seems to me that if the current administration is not willing to play nice, perhaps we should not be playing nice ourselves. If you believe your human rights are being stripped, would you not want to fight like hell to reclaim them? How is marching peacefully going to reclaim what is being stolen from you? Imagine telling a slave in the 1700s that all they needed to do to gain their freedom was shout real loud and wave signs around, as if they had the education or wherewithal to withstand sustained lashings to even do that. If one is not willing to fight against what they deem as systematic violence, then how serious are they really? Structural oppression is designed to diminish the effectiveness of peaceful opposition. The current administration doesn’t even seem to care about the protests. They didn’t even give a weak sarcastic “no please stop” before the protests even happened, and they knew about these protests way in advance. In fact, the administration sort of just laughed it off. Trump even posted an AI-generated video of himself wearing a crown and dropping literal shit on protesters from a jet plane. The reason the current administration doesn’t seem to care, in my view, is because, despite high turnout, these protests don’t actually pose a threat to them. Nothing is at stake. They control both the House and the Senate. They regularly play fast and loose with the foundational documents on which this country was built. They do not play by the rules, yet we are playing by their rules. They allow us to protest, and that should tell us something right there. We are not blocking roads, cutting off supply chains, refusing to work, or being truly disobedient in any way. Hell, the organizers of the No Kings protest in my area went through days of paperwork and approvals with the local city hall to ensure that, one, they were legally within their rights to protest, and two, that the protesters would be protected when the protest actually happened. If there is not something deeply ironic about getting city hall’s approval to protest at city hall then we seriously need to consider changing our definition of irony.

I also have my doubts about these protests' effectiveness at changing people's minds. When I was at the No Kings rally, I looked around and saw only people who were already bought in. There were no MAGA hats on the sidelines going, “All these great signs are really making me want to vote Democrat.” There were no people taking fence posts out of their asses. There were no enlightened centrists in flame pants going, “Maybe they’re right, maybe Republicans and Democrats aren’t the same, maybe I should vote Democrat.” There were no terminally online Facebook moms breaking down in tears at the realization that their favorite president, who they had thought was just trolling to “own the libs,” is in fact a seriously deranged egomaniac. I mean, I can’t claim to know what was going on with every person in the crowd that day, this is all feels basically, but the people I saw already knew who they were voting for long before they came to the protest.

There is a much deeper problem at play here, I think, and it has to do with the internet and its ability to siphon people into little echo chambers. Those who fancy themselves on the right side of the political spectrum are on Twitter, Truth Social, Facebook, et cetera, sharing their anti-liberal memes, consuming their Joe Rogan misinformation about trans kids and death vaccines and Democrat-funded child sex rings, while those who fancy themselves on the left side of the political spectrum are on Bluesky, Reddit, Tumblr, et cetera, sharing their anti-conservative memes, consuming their Rachel Maddow opinion pieces about how the country is doomed and it’s all because of Trump and anyone who voted for Trump is a monster or whatever. And this has produced a society in which intelligent discourse just cannot happen. Everyone thinks everyone else is evil, and you cannot reason with evil. You hear about families being torn apart by this type of shit every single day. People are in their little camps, and each camp thinks the other camp is the problem, and now everyone thinks everyone else the problem. We have lost the ability to empathize with people. The whole topic really requires its own essay. But what it boils down to is this, when there’s a protest like No Kings, not a single right-leaning person will take it seriously because they have already been conditioned into believing that the liberals within the No Kings camp are dumbass morons who are also possibly full-blown evil. They have already made up their minds. No amount of sign waving and chanting is going to change that.

It seems to me that peaceful protests are not for persuading the other side but for gathering those already persuaded, and that’s fine if your goal is to let voices be heard and foster a sense of community, like a big help group, but the jury of my mind is still out on whether these peaceful protests actually produce meaningful change. They seem to just reinforce the fact that Trump is exceptionally good at making certain types of people hate him, but what good is all that anger if all we’re going to do is dance to Depeche Mode and wave signs around?

My wife says I am very fatalistic about the current state of US politics and that my mindset lends itself to a certain self-defeating path. I can’t say she’s wrong. I have sort of distanced myself from the whole political process at this point. I mean, I still vote, but that’s about it. She says I have diagnosed the problem but have not prescribed a solution. I counter and say that the solution is for people to stop participating in bullshit echo chambers, and then she asks me how they are going to do that, and I say by rejecting labels like Democrat and Republican and instead treating each other like human beings, and she says OK well how are they going to do that, and I say by turning the fucking phone off, and she says that’s unrealistic. She says I deal in idealism instead of realism. I say that if I can convince just a few people to turn the fucking phone off, even for just an hour a day, then the world would be a slightly better place, and she seems to agree with that sentiment, so then she told me to turn my own fucking phone off and go to the protest, so I did, and despite all my doubts, I’m glad to have gone.
f0rrest: (Default)
I am American. My credit score is 668. I go to gas stations. I get Lays potato chips and Mountain Dew Big Gulps and my gas is $2.58 a gallon. I have American Express, Visa, and Discover credit cards. I drive a 2023 Honda Accord. It is a mid-size sedan with a 1.5L turbocharged engine. My car payment is $342.67 a month. The insurance rates are fair and I am satisfied with the coverage options. I double-check to make sure my doors are locked at stoplights when black people walk by. I am not racist. I just do this for some reason. I do not know why. I get razor blades delivered directly to my home through the Dollar Shave Club. I use Degree Cool Rush antiperspirant. It is made from aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex GLY. I do not know what these things actually do but they seem to get the job done. I get the newest iPhones free with the Verizon Unlimited myPlan. It is affordable and fits all my needs. I have not had sexual intercourse in over 2 years. I subscribe to Netflix, Amazon Prime, Spotify, Disney Plus, Hulu, HBO Max, Apple TV, Peacock, Paramount Plus, ESPN Plus, YouTube Premium, AMC Plus, Starz, Showtime, YouTube TV, CuriosityStream, Discovery Plus, and BritBox. I pay roughly $200 a month for these services and am mostly pleased with the programming they deliver. I try to stay up to date on the latest technologies. I have a 98" Class QLED Q7F 4K Samsung Vision AI Smart TV mounted to my living room wall. I enjoy watching sitcoms while relaxing in my La-Z-Boy rocking recliner after a hard day’s work. I prefer Samsung televisions over the alternatives. They have a solid, reliable product lineup. I am a millennial. I have a problem with junk food. My favorite junk foods are Lays potato chips and Nerds Ropes. I have an Apple Watch so social media and urgent news notifications are beamed directly to my wrist. Sometimes I feel depressed but don't know why. My home mortgage has an 8.6% interest rate. It is a 30-year fixed loan. I pay the bank $1578 a month to continue living comfortably. I have light brown hair and dark eyes. Sometimes I wish that I looked like Tom Cruise circa 1996, only taller. I bring printed pictures of Tom Cruise to the Sports Clips and this embarrasses me somewhat but my desire for Tom Cruise hairstyles overshadows the embarrassment. I work for a software company from home and make roughly $80,000 a year. It is not my dream job but it pays the bills. I have a hard time separating my work life from my personal life. I spend a lot of time on the computer and can type 134 words per minute. I enjoy shopping at Target on the weekends. I have a Target Red Card so I can rack up the points. I enjoy browsing the toy section because it brings back fond memories. When people ask, I tell them I am shopping for my son, although I do not have any children. I am of average height. My favorite clothing brand is Ralph Lauren. Their classic polos are both comfortable and stylish. Men who wear women's clothing make me feel uncomfortable but I am trying to be more tolerant. I have a small group of friends and we go to Charlie's Sports Bar every Saturday night. I enjoy the occasional rum and Coke. I play softball with the boys when I have the time. I have a Sam’s Club membership and buy groceries in bulk. The savings are unbelievable. Prices are going up, however, and that concerns me somewhat. I consider myself socially liberal but fiscally conservative. I vote for whoever makes the most sense. I would label myself a moderate if pressed. My favorite sport is baseball. I love eating hot dogs at the games. My favorite team is the Atlanta Braves. I do not think their name is problematic. People are too politically correct these days. Sometimes I have long conversations with ChatGPT about my life. I am single and use the Tinder dating app. I am turned off by women with tattoos but am willing to make an exception if they have a good sense of humor and can cover up. My doctor prescribed me low-dose Lexapro. I think it is helping but I am not sure. Sometimes I stare at myself in the mirror and don’t like what I see. I eat a lot of fast food but am trying to do better. I take B12, D3, and C vitamin supplements to make up for any deficiencies, also fish oil for cognitive health. I get envious when my friends are successful but congratulate them anyway. I don't believe aliens have visited the Earth but I do believe they are out there. The universe is large and that scares me somewhat. I brush my teeth with Colgate Optic White Pro Series Stain Prevention Whitening Toothpaste. Sometimes I stay up too late watching late-night television and drinking Mountain Dew. I am trying to get better about this. I take melatonin to fall asleep but have vivid night terrors and have trouble waking up in the mornings. Sometimes I see movies in the theater by myself. I buy buckets of popcorn with extra butter sauce and feel bad after eating it. I enjoy Marvel films because they are good fun and take my mind off the stresses of everyday life. I think Avengers: Age of Ultron is very underrated. I tell myself I am going to eat less but end up eating more for some reason and this disturbs me somewhat. I have considered weight loss medication but am afraid of the side effects. I prefer not to make waves. I am constantly comparing my lawn with other lawns in the neighborhood. I prefer to sit rather than stand when urinating so that I can look at my iPhone. I like to scroll the Reddit home feed and Google News reel to stay informed. I see the same content multiple times a day but still click on it for some reason. I own an egg-shaped air fryer. It works very well for Hot Pockets brand sandwiches. I watch pornography on my MacBook Pro sometimes and feel bad about it. I appreciate the new legislation requiring a valid driver's license to access pornographic websites because it makes it harder for me to access content that I feel is morally reprehensible. I enjoy Saratoga Springs Water over tap water and believe tap water to be unhealthy. My favorite book is Atomic Habits: An Easy & Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Break Bad Ones. I was raised Catholic but sometimes wonder if God actually exists. I think Christianity provides a solid moral framework for society. I did not care for the ending of Game of Thrones. When people talk to me I usually zone out and start thinking about myself and this makes me feel bad somewhat. I enjoy the music of Imagine Dragons and don't care if others think they're lame. I keep my lawn immaculate and this gives me some satisfaction. My favorite cereal is Kellogg's Frosted Flakes. They have a nice crunch and go well with my Fairlife brand protein shakes. Rap music does not sound good to me and espouses values which I do not agree with. I do not mind immigrants being over here but believe they should be properly documented. There is a persistent sense of dread that creeps up when I do not keep myself occupied. I wash myself with Axe Apollo Body Wash. My favorite television show is The Office. I own a gun. It is a Glock 19. It is a 9 mm Luger. I keep it in my bedside drawer. It helps me feel comfortable at night.
f0rrest: (Default)
For a few autumn months there during the COVID-19 pandemic, I drove a 1998 Volvo V70 GLT.

It reminded me of a boxy silver caterpillar. It was all segmented and rode real close to the ground. It had elongated rear lights composed of several smaller square lights, like a pair of compound eyes. It also had cat-like features. Its front-facing car face was a cat face. It had big feline headlights squinted on either side of an oversized grille reminiscent of the mesh of a wet cat nose. Below the grille was a slightly curved line of black open space, like a neutral but satisfied feline expression, as if it had just filled itself on treats and nip or something. The back hatch opened to a significant amount of storage space. It had that distinct nineties car smell, the kind of smell that, due to the breakdown of dead animal matter, only gets stronger as time passes. You could practically see the warm musty leather smell billowing out in thick golden-brown clouds whenever you opened the doors. The front dash was all analog, with little plastic lines arcing back and forth for fuel usage and miles per hour. The clock had numbers made of those small green rectangles you see on ancient digital alarm clocks. There was no CD player, only radio and cassette, so I bought one of those cassette-to-AUX adapters to play music with my phone, and I'm still mystified as to how that actually works. Pushing down the gas pedal produced acceleration akin to a small fart that got louder the longer you held your foot down. It had no cup holders, so I had to order some cheap plastic inserts that fit between the seats. The brakes were flat-out dangerous. It ate batteries like they were Tic Tacs or something, which ended up costing me a small fortune. And I'm sure it failed all modern-day carbon emission tests. But the car was undeniably cool and retro.

I didn't drive the Volvo for long though, mostly because it seriously broke down only a few months after I got it, but also because it depressed the living hell out of me, because the car wasn't just undeniably cool and retro, it was also haunted.

Every now and then, as far back as I can remember, during the Thanksgiving-Christmas months, my father would take me to my grandma’s house up in Watkinsville, Georgia, to check in on old Rosevelyn. She lived alone in this three-story burgundy brick house on a hill off a side road miles outside of town. The house was photographic. Virginia Creeper crept along the walls, and fuzzy green moss grew between every brick. I imagined the house itself was averse to change, like an inert brick giant standing steadfast and tall against the tides of time, showing faint signs of age but still holding strong. The driveway ran beside a retaining wall that held back a raised lawn, leading to a basement garage that felt almost underground. You had to walk up loose brick steps to even get to her front yard, which looked down on the driveway from the brick wall, the top of which was covered in thick grass. As a child, I would T-pose myself perilously on the top of the wall, descend its elevation all the way to the end and back, and as a teenager, I would sit on the wall, legs dangling, Nokia phone in one hand, texting my girlfriend about how bored I was, and as an adult, I would stand atop the wall, pining nostalgically about how I used to do all those things. But from that high perch, regardless of era, one thing remained constant, Rosevelyn’s 1998 Volvo V70 GLT, parked in the shade of the towering oaks.

Rosevelyn had a driver’s license but hated driving, so from visit to visit, until I was like thirty years old, the Volvo never moved. It was always in that same spot, right up until her death.

The inside of the house was static. It was large but felt somehow small. The front door had a knob right in the middle, and the knob itself was surrounded by ornate gold trim, making it awkward to twist. The door opened to a large room with antique couches and a grand piano. It was more of a parlor, really. The room was sunken somewhat, with steps on either end, and it was long, so as a child I would run back and forth, sometimes stopping to play simple melodies on the piano. The parlor connected to both the living room and the kitchen, themselves connected without walls or doors between them. The living room was cramped, with an antique couch and some musty love seats and a television set all behind a standing screen, and there was a large sliding glass door on the far end that opened to a steep backyard that was unkempt and dotted with oaks. There was only one lamp in the living room, and despite the glass door being uncovered, it was somehow always dark orange and gloomy in there. A number of tables and shelves lined the walls, atop which were family photos and dusty tomes and knickknacks, particularly Hummels, of which she had hundreds, everywhere, some set up in little scenes behind an ornate glass cabinet. Angelic porcelain children laughing, tossing balls, and playing little flutes. There was a desk in the corner, near the entrance to the kitchen, where an old typewriter sat, surrounded by letters, stamps, and fountain pens. She seemed to be an avid writer but produced no notable works and never talked about it. As a young woman, she was a real estate agent, and, when she got much older, started working for my dad’s real estate company, but as far as I could tell, she didn’t do any actual work, although by her desk, there was an old wooden sign with CALL ROSEVELYN HARRISON 760-6231 in bright red font. That number connects to a dead line now. I imagine the sign was probably staked in a plot of land somewhere long ago, but by the time I was like ten, it had become just another relic of her past. There were little historical relics like this all over her house. The kitchen was full of them. The cabinets were filled with ancient tableware. Dishes and plates and bowls with all sorts of ornate trim and images imprinted on them, images in that distinct 50s-style Americana artwork with rosy-cheeked children with big dimples that looked both photorealistic and incredibly uncanny. These things held special sentimental value to her for some reason. The kitchen window stool was decorated with Santas and elves from bygone Christmases. There was no dishwasher, everything was done by hand. The kitchen sink was sunk into the counter and made from vitreous china. The silverware might have been actual silver. Some sort of elaborately patterned red cloth draped every surface. The pantry was full of years-old Little Debbie Oatmeal Cream Pies that she would offer me whenever I visited, regardless of my age, and they tasted great. I grew to love Oatmeal Cream Pies. Beyond the living room was a long hallway that connected to all three bedrooms in the home. There were no televisions in these bedrooms, only antique lamps with ornate shades and big mirrors and nightstands on which King James sat. My father’s old childhood bedroom had been turned into a guest room, but remnants of his youth remained. Baseball cards, sports memorabilia, an ancient radio boombox, loose cassettes from the 70s and 80s, and even some of his old clothing deep in the walk-in closet. I got the impression she kept these things as a reminder. That’s probably why the interior of the home hadn’t changed in decades. Maybe the permanence helped her in some way, made her less lonely. Maybe she thought if she just left things the way they were, she would never forget the past, never forget who she was, never forget what she did. Right outside my dad’s old bedroom was a big wooden door to the basement. As a child, looking down from the top of the long stairwell, it was like staring down into a monster’s den, so I never went down there. As a teenager, it was mysterious and alluring, so I would work up the nerve to creep down the creaky wooden steps, but when I got to the very bottom, I would get spooked due to the lack of light and quickly climb back upstairs, feeling as if a ghost was on my back the whole time. As an adult, I would stare down that dark stairwell and see nothing but an existential void. At least that’s how it felt the last time I was there, at the estate sale.

Sometime in October 2020, I was in my office playing video games, and I received a call from my dad. He usually started every call with some comment about how I hadn’t called him in months, but this time, in a solemn tone, all he said was my name. Forrest.

I thought maybe he was joking around, so I said, “Dad.”

“Your grandma’s in the hospital.”

“Is she OK? What happened?”

“She fell down the basement stairs.”

“Is she OK?”

There was a weird silence. I couldn’t even hear the normal background static, like he had covered the phone’s microphone with his hand or something.

“Is she OK?”

“I hadn’t heard from her in almost a week.”

“What do you mean?”

“She fell down the stairs, Forrest.”

“I know, you said that.”

“She was down there for days.”

Something happened with my stomach, like a phantom had reached through my flesh and twisted at my insides or something. Some horrible revelation reached my body before it had reached my mind, and when my mind caught up, I stared off into the wall, wide-eyed and speechless.

“She was down there for days, Forrest.”

“I… I heard you.”

“I drove down there. To her house. To check on her. The Volvo was still there. All the doors were locked.”

“How did you get in?”

“I went to the basement door, the one by the garage.”

There was another long pause. This time I heard something like a forced cough. When my dad returned, his voice was shaking.

“I looked through the window, the one on the door,” he said, pausing again.

“OK, what did you see? What happened?”

“It was dark, Forrest. I didn’t see anything. But it felt weird. Something was off. I got this feeling in my stomach, you know the one. And I don’t know what I was thinking, but I punched through the glass, cut my hand all up.”

“Are you OK?”

“That doesn’t matter.”

“...”

“I punched through, unlocked the door from the inside, let myself in. Then, first thing I did was, I went to the stairwell to go upstairs. It was dark. I had trouble finding the light switch, but I knew it was at the bottom of the stairwell.”

“Dad.”

“When I turned the light on,” he said, pausing.

“It’s OK, Dad. I don’t need to know.”

A long silence followed this leg of the conversation. I didn’t know what to say. I thought about Rosevelyn tumbling down the dark stairwell, alone, landing on the hard concrete floor, not being able to move, just lying there, maybe a broken leg or a broken hip. I didn’t want to know. Why was she going down there to begin with? What was she thinking? I thought about her just lying there, her body twisted and mangled, screaming out for help, no food or water, writhing in pain, for days. The thought of it made me sick. I started feeling terrible for having not spent much time with her. I never called her. I never sent cards. I never wished her a happy birthday. Nothing. When I was a kid, I thought she was boring. When I was a teen, I thought she was boring. When I was an adult, I told myself I was just too busy, too busy to care. And then I started feeling bad for feeling bad, like how selfish am I just thinking about myself here when she was the one down there writhing in pain at the bottom of a dark stairwell for days. And I couldn’t even imagine how my father was feeling. I had never lost a parent before. I didn’t know what it was like. There was no way for me to empathize. I didn’t know what the hell to say to him. There were no words. I started wondering what was going through Rosevelyn’s head when she was down there on the concrete. I wondered if her life had flashed before her eyes, like they say. I wondered if she had thought about me, how I never called, how I never seemed to care. I wondered if she had cursed me in her mind. And then I started feeling bad about making this all about me again, and then I started feeling really bad because I had started thinking about her Volvo. My car was a wreck. I needed a new car. I wondered if I could maybe have her Volvo. I don’t know why I thought this, but I did, and it made me feel really bad. It made me feel so bad that I closed my eyes shut for what felt like ten minutes. I breathed in, breathed out. I tried to stop myself from thinking about myself. Then I started thinking if she had been angry down there, angry that after 84 years it had to end this way, alone at the bottom of a stairwell. She was a Christian woman. I knew that. But I wondered if, maybe, down there on the hard concrete, I wondered if maybe she had been angry with God for doing this to her. Or maybe not. Maybe she was faithful until the very end. Maybe this was all part of God’s plan, maybe that’s what she had thought down there while she was splayed out, unable to move, on the hard concrete, in total darkness. I don’t know. Maybe on the way down, maybe she just hit her head, passed out. Maybe she just dreamed a pleasant dream the whole time. Maybe her mind went into self-preservation mode, flipped off her consciousness, flooded her body with endorphins, put her to sleep, made her dream a pleasant dream. Maybe she dreamed of my father as a young boy. Maybe her death came so swiftly that she didn’t even know it was happening to begin with. I stopped thinking about the Volvo. I started thinking that maybe she hadn’t felt any pain, and this thought made me feel a little better, until I remembered what my dad had said about Rosevelyn being in the hospital.

I’m not sure how much time had passed since we last said a word to each other, but when I broke the silence, I said, “How’s she doing, you know, in the hospital?”

“She’s in a coma.”

“How quickly did it, you know, happen?”

“What do you mean?”

“I mean, was she conscious the whole time, or did she, you know, did she pass out?”

“I don’t know.”

“What about the doctors? What are they saying?”

“They don’t know either.”

There was another silence, shorter this time.

“I want you to come down in three weeks,” my dad said, his voice lower than before.

“To see her, in the hospital?”

“No, for the funeral.”

“But she’s alive, I thought.”

“She is.”

“...”

“I don’t know, Forrest.”

“What do you mean, you don’t know?”

“I just don’t know, son.”

“Tell me, Dad.”

“I have to go now.”

“Wait.”

“I’ll send you the date.”

And then the line went dead.

My father gave a speech at the funeral. I recited a poem. I don’t remember the details all that well. It was an open casket. Rosevelyn was on display for everyone to see. But she wasn’t herself. Her face was weird, waxy, made up. Her prominent jowls had been removed somehow. She did not look like the Rosevelyn that I knew. I had to look away. It was perverse, in some way. Disrespectful, almost. But no one else seemed to mind, so I didn’t say anything.

Later that day, my dad drove me to the old house on the hill to pick up the Volvo. The driveway was packed with cars. We walked up the loose brick stairs to the front door, which was wide open. Two large men with tattoos were carrying an antique couch through the door. We slid past them. There was a crude cardboard sign in the parlor. ROSEVELYN HARRISON ESTATE SALE. All sorts of people were going from room to room, picking things up, examining them very closely. My father and I walked through the house. There were price tags on literally everything. Little handmade yellow price tags. Some of the Hummels were going for $50 a pop. The antique Santas in the kitchen were $25. The 50s-era dishware ranged from $2 to $10 apiece. The loveseats were $75. Everything had a price. It was perverse. I remember being personally offended, walking through that house. I felt like they were selling pieces of Rosevelyn’s soul or something, like the estate sale company or whoever had organized this had no regard for human life, like they didn't care who Rosevelyn was as a person. As if the moment she died, they swooped in like vultures, tagged every part of her with some arbitrary number, and then opened her soul up to the public and said, “Feast, my pretties, to your heart’s content,” all to make a profit. It was sickening to me. It was gross, disrespectful, and consumeristic. I couldn’t fucking stand it. And when my father and I made it to his old bedroom, where I saw those yellow price tags tacked onto all my dad’s old stuff, I couldn’t hold it in any longer.

I turned to my dad and said, “Who would fucking do this?”

And he said, “What do you mean, son?”

“What sort of asshole would just sell all of Rosevelyn’s stuff like this? She collected this stuff. It was important to her. It had sentimental value. They’re even selling some of your old stuff, Dad. Don’t you care about that? It’s fucking greedy, and gross, that's what it is.”

“I did this.”

I paused for a moment. I think I even did a double take. I wasn’t sure what I was hearing. “What?”

“I hired the estate sale company.”

I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. “What? Why? Why would you do that?”

A small family entered the room. A woman started rummaging through the closet. A man was examining the boombox. A young boy was cycling through baseball cards. My father and I were just standing there, watching this unfold. I was shaking. Something like self-righteous fury had consumed my soul. My fists were clenched. I felt like I was about to scream.

Trying to contain myself, I turned to leave the room.

But just as I was about to leave, my dad stepped into the doorway, blocking me, then he placed a hand on my shoulder and said, “None of this is important, son. Rosevelyn’s not here anymore.”

I looked him straight in the face, thinking like duh, obviously she’s not here anymore. What do you think I am, stupid? I’m a grown thirty-year-old man. Don’t patronize me, asshole. Get the fuck out of my way.

Then he placed a hand on his chest and said, “She’s in here.”

Later that night, I drove home in Rosevelyn’s 1998 Volvo V70 GLT.
f0rrest: (kid pix w/ text)
Intelligence. People value intelligence, especially high intelligence. Intelligence enables us to solve complex problems, invent great things, write incredible novels and essays, and even go to the moon. But what if intelligence, instead of being this like great amazing thing, is actually a kind of curse? A curse that causes us to overanalyze things, get stuck in our own heads, become detached and despondent and cold?

That's the thesis statement.

About a week ago I finished reading Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace. It's a big book. It took me like two months to finish, although to my credit I only read like a dozen pages per day, but I always looked forward to reading those dozen pages, which must mean I enjoyed the book a good bit, especially since sections of the novel intrusively invade my thoughts multiple times a day. The novel did leave me feeling somewhat confused and frustrated and sad though, but I've found that the best things in life often do that, leave you somewhat confused and frustrated and sad, maybe because those things are often the most rewarding.

Some people say that Infinite Jest has no comprehensible plot, that it's just a thousand-page ramble tied loosely together by a core set of themes, that it’s impenetrable and overwrought on purpose, that it's just a pretentious exercise in literary masturbation, and those people probably haven't read the actual book, but they're also not entirely wrong, because Infinite Jest is all of those things, but it’s also so much more.

Infinite Jest is a post-postmodern encyclopedic work of fiction set in a near-future version of North America where the United States, now called the Organization of North American Nations, led by former B-list movie actor slash Las Vegas crooner President Johnny Gently, who ran on a populist platform centered around “cleaning up America’s garbage” and bears a shockingly prescient resemblance to Donald J. Trump, has subsumed both Canada and Mexico and has “subsidized” time, meaning calendar years have been sold to the highest-paying corporation, for like advertising or whatever, so instead of numbered years you get stuff like “Year of the Tucks Medicated Pad” and “Year of the Whisper-Quiet Maytag Dishmaster” and so on, and O.N.A.N. uses giant catapults to launch the nation’s chemical waste and radioactive garbage into a region near New England now dubbed “the Great Concavity,” which has turned the whole area effectively into a no-man’s land where unspeakable mutant horrors like giant babies and feral man-eating hamsters roam in packs, which is a detail almost inconsequential to the overall plot, because the story is mostly a rumination on addiction, sincerity, the dangers of irony, human connection, the importance of family, existential dread, and the fallacious belief that attaining all your goals will somehow make you feel happy and fulfilled, centering around the teenage students at a prestigious Boston tennis academy and the recovering drug addicts living in a nearby halfway house, and these characters’ stories are told through a collage of scenes presented in no sensible chronological order whatsoever, like if Infinite Jest were a photograph then David Foster Wallace took that photograph and cut it up into a million pieces and then asked you to put it back together with nothing but a magnifying glass and some Scotch tape, which is exactly what it feels like trying to piece together what the hell is actually going on in this book.

And I’m not going to try to explain what the hell is actually going on in the book, but I will give you just enough context to support my thesis statement up there. Needless to say but the rest of this entry contains significant spoilers.

The plot ultimately centers around the drama of this one particular family, surname Incandenza. The father of this family, James O. Incandenza, was this super-intelligent guy who invented some super high-tech fusion technology but got bored with that so founded a tennis academy but got bored with that too so decided to make indie films, pretty much. James was addicted to his interests and would play them out until he got bored, and although mastering each interest, they still left him feeling bored and unfulfilled. At some point before the events of the novel, James creates this film called Infinite Jest, and this film is so entertaining that, if you watch it, you cannot stop watching it, so you just waste away and die watching it. This film has been copied and sent to people all over North America, resulting in many deaths. Questions abound around the contents of the film, a detail that can't be confirmed because there’s no one alive who’s watched it, and why the film was even created in the first place, which the novel does address, although in a sort of lynchian fashion. The whole plot of the book sort of swirls around this titular film, as all the central characters have some connection to it, even if it's like six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon levels of connection. The symbolic significance of Infinite Jest, the film, and how it relates to our modern entertainment landscape, particularly streaming culture, phones, and having all this media at our fingertips at all times, is especially prescient and interesting, although none of that ultimately matters for my thesis, so I won't be covering that here. Anyway, shortly after creating Infinite Jest, the film, James Incandenza kills himself by cooking his own head in a microwave oven, which sounds like an impossible feat but is actually fully explained in both technical and gory detail. He leaves behind a wife and three kids. Hal, Orin, and Mario, who I will refer to as the brothers Incandenza hence forth. 

Hal is sort of like the main character of the novel. He’s the youngest of the brothers Incandenza. He's seventeen years old and enrolled at his late father’s prestigious tennis academy, Enfield Tennis Academy. He’s a super genius just like his father, able to recite dictionary definitions of pretty much any word on command. He’s also cold, detached, downright condescending sometimes, super ironic, unable to express his thoughts and feelings properly, and also super addicted to marijuana. It turns out that Hal is very much like his father in this respect, although his father’s substance of choice was alcohol. Hal was never very close with his father, they couldn’t connect emotionally, mostly because of their vast almost self-defeating intellects, and this haunts Hal both mentally and physically, like the wraith of his late father actually haunts him, like James’s ghost, literally, haunts Hal, in the book, in some weird lynchian attempt to bring Hal out of his detached intellectual shell. So when Hal’s not rigorously training for tennis or playing tournaments, he’s spiraling mentally into a depression by overanalyzing everything in his life, particularly his relationship with his late father, and when he’s not spiraling in some sort of over-analytical depression, he’s smoking weed in secret in the Enfield basement and blowing the smoke into a ceiling vent to hide the smell, to drown it all out, bury his emotional baggage, pretty much.

Orin, who is also incredibly intelligent, is the oldest of the brothers Incandenza. He's a professional football player and a sex addict. Orin spends a lot of time mentally torturing himself and getting anxious and harping on the old times and getting into all sorts of sexual trouble due to his sex addiction which all stems from some sort of unresolved childhood thing with his mom and dad or whatever that he's constantly thinking about and overanalyzing to death. He's also superficial, selfish, and incredibly manipulative, especially with women.

And then there’s Mario, the middle child of the brothers Incandenza. Mario loves his dad. He wants to be just like his dad. Mario makes films like his dad. Mario even wears a helmet with a tripod camera thing attached to it on his head, so he can film everything that's going on in his life, so he can use the footage for future films. He almost never leaves his room at the Academy without the helmet on, which makes for some very comical scenes. But Mario was born premature, and he has pretty much every physical deformity ever medically documented, so he’s hunched over like the Hunchback of Notre Dame, and he has claws instead of hands, and his head is humongous, and he has these big bulging eyes, and he’s just like, for all intents and purposes, monstrous, for lack of a better term, and he’s also not very bright, like stuck-forever-at-a-third-grade-reading-level levels of brightness. It would be unfair to say that Mario is “stupid,” because he can comprehend things just fine, but he has a lot of trouble communicating and sometimes can’t follow along in complex conversations. He’s more like incredibly simple. But the thing about Mario is that, although he gets sad sometimes about the death of his father, as anyone would, he never gets stuck in his head like his brothers do, he never questions if his father really loved him or whatever like his brothers do, he never waxes himself existentially into a spiraling depression like his brothers do, he never develops some sort of crippling addiction because of unresolved childhood stuff like his brothers do, he’s never sarcastic or ironic, and he never once says anything bad about anyone, like ever, because Mario is the nicest, most sincere, most loving brother Incandenza. Mario is like the beating cardiac muscle of the book.

And that’s why Mario Incandenza is my favorite character in Infinite Jest.

Mario is a stark contrast to almost every other character in Infinite Jest, especially Hal and Orin and James, who are all too smart for their own good. Due to Mario’s stunted intellectual growth, he seems to lack the faculties to overanalyze people and situations, taking everything at face value, and because of this deficiency he approaches everything with the naive innocence of a young child, harboring no preconceived notions or negative stereotypes about anyone, which leads to him treating everyone he meets with a level of respect that Hal, Orin, and James just are not capable of. I mean, Hal and Orin and James are often cordial and respectful to people, but behind the mask they are brooding, distrusting, and critical, whereas Mario just does not have the capacity to be like that. Mario is guileless, innocent, pure of heart almost. And Mario, despite being frankly hideously-deformed and a little slow in the head, is treated with respect by others because Mario himself treats everyone with respect, because he’s simply incapable of doing otherwise, because he doesn’t have the intellectual capacity and all the psychic baggage that comes along with that. And because Mario is like this, he’s viewed by many as a pleasant, guru-like person to talk to, so people often go to him for advice, especially his own brother Hal, who often calls Mario “Boo,” and who, in one scene, goes to Mario for advice on what to do about some extreme anxiety he, Hal, is feeling about not having smoked weed in a long time yet still perhaps failing an academy drug test and other stressful existential tennis-life things, this scene is also the only time Hal opens up to anyone about anything in the entirety of the novel, which is important, and Mario, in this scene, delivers the best advice delivered by anyone in the entire book, and this advice is not just the best advice in the book, it’s also like the thesis statement, the point, of the entire book, which sort of makes Mario like the most important character in the book, in my opinion. The scene hit me so hard that I had to put the book down and text one of my friends about it, so I’m going to just copy-paste the tail end of the scene here, for reference.

Hal & Mario excerpt, Infinite Jest, pg.785 )

Mario is beyond intellectual obfuscation of any sort. He’s simple. He does not have the capacity to lie, either to himself or to others. He does not hide things. He is guileless, innocent, pure of heart. And because of this, he naturally just sees through the bullshit. He sees through intellectual rationalizations and mental decision-tree-like anxieties that stem from intellectualism. And because of this, when Hal opens up to Mario for the first time pretty much ever, expressing his emotions, fears, and doubts, and then asking Mario for advice on what he, Hal, should do, Mario correctly and simply points out the obvious, that Hal is already doing what he should be doing, opening up, expressing his emotions, admitting that he has a problem, coming out of his intellectually detached shell, which are things Hal literally never thought to do before because he’s just too damn intellectual about everything. Hal’s vast intellect, while enabling him to accomplish great mental feats, has also led him into a black hole of irony and insincerity that ultimately undermines his own happiness.

By the end of the novel, Hal has become so wrapped in his head that he can no longer communicate with other people, James has microwaved his own skull, Orin gets abducted by Wheelchair Assassins and tortured by being placed in a tumbler full of cockroaches, and Mario, well, Mario is fine. He’s just wearing his ridiculous tripod headgear, filming stuff, being nice to people, doing what he likes to do, not overanalyzing any of it, because what’s the point in that?

Some people might say Mario is stupid, since he does have a number of learning disabilities, but “stupid” is ultimately a subjective societal construct. I would say instead of “stupid,” Mario is simple. But regardless of whichever semantics you subscribe to, the point is, we should all try to be a bit more like Mario, be that more simple or more “stupid” or more whatever you want to call it.

Because if ignorance is bliss, perhaps “stupidity” is transcendence.
f0rrest: (Default)
“I’m just sick of ego, ego, ego. My own and everybody else’s. I’m sick of everybody that wants to get somewhere, do something distinguished and all, be somebody interesting. It’s disgusting.”
—J.D. Salinger, Franny and Zooey


A little over a year ago, I created a community blogging platform called howdoyouspell.cool, powered by Write Freely, an online space wherein anyone could sign up, create a blog, and write about whatever they wanted. Back then, I told myself that I was inspired by this concept of the “open internet,” a sort of return to the wild-west era of the Internet in which I grew up, beyond the reaches of devious corporate overlords and money-making algorithms, where people could express themselves however they wanted, no matter how weird or vile that expression might be. But as of yesterday, October 4, 2025, I have retired the domain name and am now in the process of shutting the platform down for good. And now, on this eve of the platform’s obliteration, I find myself analyzing my true motivations for having created it to begin with. Was it really to provide a place for people to express themselves unfettered, or was it something else?

Well, I've come to the conclusion that it was indeed something else, something performative and superficial. I've come to the conclusion that it was all ego, ego, ego. I just wanted to be cool, pretty much. In hindsight, it’s pretty obvious. I mean, the word “cool” is right there in the damn domain name.

To be honest, before I had even created the blogging platform, I kind of knew it was a bad idea. For one, I had tried creating online communities in the past but had always ended up abandoning them a few months after creation because being an administrator just doesn’t suit me, because people annoy me very easily. And for two, I don’t usually get along with my fellow writers to begin with. 

This is a sweeping generalization, I know, but I think most writers are pretentious, narcissistic know-it-alls who are desperate for validation. They want people to read their stuff and be like, “holy shit, this is the most deep and thoughtful thing I’ve ever read, this author is a genius.” Writers seem to get off on impressing others and cultivating airs more so than the actual act of writing itself. I mean, why even publish anything for public consumption if, one, you didn’t want it to be read by other people, which indicates some level of validation-seeking, and two, you didn’t think your writing had some sort of academic or artistic merit worth someone else’s time, which suggests a certain level of pretentious arrogance that contributes to the whole know-it-all thing. I mean, what do you think this whole journal you’re reading here is, exactly? Some sort of selfless practice of the art of writing? Some sort of altruism? No, it's an effort to put myself out there in some sort of vain attempt at validation and like-minded community building. As they say, it takes one to know one. Do note, however, that my wife says my biggest character flaw is that I project myself onto others and have a hard time relating to the thoughts and feelings of other people because of this, so maybe this should all be taken with a nice, heaping pile of salt.

By the time I had created the howdoyouspell.cool platform, I had written something like twenty essays and two short stories, all of which tried to marry my love of video games with philosophical and societal concepts that I admittedly understood very poorly, and I had electronically published two full-blown magazines also, both of which I had done all the editing and graphical design for. I thought, at the time, that all of my stuff was very well-written and intelligent. I was trying very hard to make a point with my writing, and I wanted very much for someone to read my work and say something like, “holy shit, this is the most deep and thoughtful thing I’ve ever read, this author is a genius.” But of course this praise and validation never materialized, because barely anyone read my stuff, and those who did were more interested in the video game aspects than the philosophical, societal aspects, so I began to resent the audience that I had cultivated, seeing them as shallow and vapid, only seeming to care about playing video games instead of thinking about video games. So I decided, hey, you know what, what if I make a writing platform, position myself as some sort of writing authority figure, and then, by using this facade of “I’m just a passionate writer who wants to provide you the chance of hosting your own blog wherein you can say whatever you want without fear of being banned,” I would maybe attract the sort of high-minded audience that would appreciate my stuff. I’m not sure if I was consciously thinking about it like this at the time, but using the forty-twenty power of hindsight, this was certainly what was going on. Ego, ego, ego. I wanted to be perceived as a cool writer. I thought my writing was incredible, and I believed that if people just read it, I would become this sort of online writing folk hero of sorts. In short, I was desperate for attention.

Probably needless to say, but this whole scheme did not provide the attention I craved, mostly because my writing wasn’t actually very good, but also because, by advertising my new blogging platform as a sort of haven for free-speech absolutists, I had once again attracted an audience that I immediately grew to resent. Because upon advertising my platform on Mastodon, a defederated social media network of which I no longer have a profile, the first person who reached out to me was this one guy who wrote erotic anime-inspired fiction that almost exclusively featured unrealistically well-endowed chubby women who battled and performed sexual acts on each other, because his characters were all like mixed-martial artists or something, and in all of this guy’s stories, the women vocally expressed hatred for one another but always had this sort of repressed sexual attraction bubbling underneath the surface, so they’d be in a fighting arena for whatever reason and they’d start off all like, “Do you think you’re better than me? I hate your fucking guts, you nasty tramp. I’m the best fighter in the world.” But by the end of the story, they’d be rolling around completely nude in the middle of the arena, making out and fondling each other or whatever. This is how all the guy’s stories went. 

This author’s work was inherently offensive to me because he very obviously treated women as mere sexual objects, so I didn’t want this guy to create a blog on my platform, but I had advertised the platform as a sort of free-speech haven where anyone could post anything, so from the very start of this whole attention-seeking endeavor, I was faced with a sort of ethical dilemma. Am I really in support of absolute freedom of expression if I’m unwilling to allow this misogynist objectifier of women to post his nasty smut trash on my blogging platform? I felt sort of ethically committed to the bit, so to speak, in that I had advertised the platform as a free-speech platform, and but what would it look like if I suddenly told this guy that actually no, you can’t post on my platform because your writing is disgusting and offensive to me?

In hindsight, this was an egotistical concern on my part, because I was more worried about how people would perceive my shifting stances on the free-speech thing than I was about actually following my own moral, ethical gut code, which told me that by no means should I allow this guy’s awful smut garbage on my platform. But I ended up caving to my ego and letting this guy create his smut blog, because I didn't want to make an ethical 180 on the free-speech thing I had originally committed to, out of fear of being perceived as some sort of hypocritical phony.

As of today, there are like ten users, not counting myself, on howdoyouspell.cool, nine of whom only posted a few entries before vanishing without a trace, but this guy, this misogynist objectifier of women, has stuck around. In fact, I believe he just posted something last week, another chapter in his Beat, Prey, Love series, the title of which follows the annoying format of all his other titles, that being taking an existing movie title and altering it somewhat to vaguely suggest something erotic going on, which is a play-on-words trend that makes my eyes roll into the back of my head even when not used in a sexualized context, as it's never as clever as the author likes to think it is, and it's frankly low-effort and offensively unoriginal. 

The smut author has been consistently posting his drivel on howdoyouspell.cool for like a year now, and considering I had stopped posting to the platform several months ago, that makes this one nasty guy the sole contributor to the site. So ultimately, at this point, I don’t feel too bad about pulling the plug on the whole platform. In fact, I might even do a villainous little laugh when this guy sends me a very sternly worded email after he attempts to log in only to find his disgusting porn writing completely wiped from the internet because his blog no longer exists.

So yeah, I’m feeling pretty good about the death of howdoyouspell.cool, considering the platform was born primarily out of a desire to satisfy my own ego, and it really only attracted one very nasty guy. For one, I don’t want to provide a platform for smut, and for two, I’m kind of through trying so hard to be cool. I want to be the death of cool. I'm done pursuing projects driven solely by my own ego, because my desire to be perceived as distinguished and interesting and cool has only produced within me feelings of anxiety and phonyism.

But is this truly all that my ego has produced? 

A couple of months ago, I read this novel by J.D. Salinger titled Franny and Zooey, which is sort of like a Socratic dialogue between two siblings. Franny is a young actress attending college who is fed up with the ego-fueled intellectual phoniness of her peers and has become obsessed with shedding her own ego through the practice of a repetitive mental prayer she learned by reading an old religious text. Franny is also the source of the quote at the beginning of this journal entry. Zooey, Franny’s brother, disagrees with Franny that ego is the root of all her problems. At one point, about a hundred and sixty pages in, Zooey says something that kind of opened my eyes to the possibility that maybe ego isn’t such a bad thing. He said,

“What about your beloved Epictetus? Or your beloved Emily Dickinson? You want your Emily, every time she has an urge to write a poem, to just sit down and say a prayer till her nasty, egotistical urge goes away?”

Much like the creation of howdoyouspell.cool, my entire body of writing has been largely the product of my own ego, which on the surface is a fact that seems to taint the writing, but does it really? Looking back at everything I’ve written, even though much of it is hot garbage, I’m proud of some of it and grateful to have written it all. Even the writing I now think is hot garbage, I don’t regret having written it, because it helped me become a better writer and led to work that I feel has real, meaningful value, however hard that is to actually quantify.

So the whole thing has me thinking about ego in a deeper way, like, is ego really all that bad? It seems to me that most human behavior could probably be tied back to ego in some way. I mean, even a super generous person who donates to charities probably gets some sort of personal satisfaction from others perceiving them as a charitable person, which is a sort of ego-stroke, in a way. But is that a bad thing? I mean, even if that’s the case, that the charitable person is driven by ego, does the motive even matter at that point? The charity is still happening, regardless of whether the ego was involved or not. Isn’t the charitable person’s ego producing good outcomes in this hypothetical situation? And if we concede that this egotism does indeed produce good outcomes sometimes, then is ego really all that bad?

Like Franny, maybe I've been looking at ego the wrong way. Perhaps ego is more like this neutral power within us all, this driving force that is neither good nor bad, and what really matters is how we choose to use our egos and the outcomes of those ego-driven choices.

A sort of like Ego-Driven Consequentialism or something.

Most Popular Tags